Skip to comments.
TV watchdog checks claims of bias on Murdoch channel [Fox News]
The Guardian ^
| May 8, 2003
| Matt Wells
Posted on 05/08/2003 3:33:18 AM PDT by ejdrapes
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: ejdrapes
Bump
To: ejdrapes
The worldwide Left have their knickers in a wad over Fox, probably because Fox has destroyed the steely grip the Leftists had on broadcast news. No surprise that they're resorting to censorship to try to silence Fox.
42
posted on
05/08/2003 2:54:24 PM PDT
by
Major Matt Mason
(np Richard Thompson, "The Old Kit Bag")
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.
43
posted on
05/08/2003 5:01:33 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
To: mhking
The Murdoch-owned Fox News Channel, whose determinedly pro-US stance during the Iraq conflict brought it critical notoriety but commercial success, is being investigated by television regulators in Britain for alleged bias. This is laughable. These people are so threatened by the fact the leftist anti-American creeps no longer have a monopoly in the media.
44
posted on
05/08/2003 5:47:32 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
To: weegee
Aaargh! Weapon of ass destruction!
46
posted on
05/08/2003 7:30:59 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Becki
The independent television commission is investigating nine complaints by viewers of the channel.. 1. CNN
2. BBC
3. ABC
4. CBS
5. NBC
6. Al Jazeera
7. La Monde
8. Peter Jennings
9. Dan Rather
Becki, You nailed it.
They are threatening to censor FOX over nine complaints?
They either have an anti-FOX agenda or way too much time on their hands.
47
posted on
05/08/2003 7:46:08 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: Becki
Perfect, Becki LOL
48
posted on
05/08/2003 9:16:14 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(I wondered why somebody didn't do something. Then I realized... I am somebody! - Anonymous)
To: Publius6961
Well, here's a bit of info... take note of the last line, he's planning a book about the "myth" of the "Loony Left". My goodness, think he could be a liberal????? ;-)
Looks like he is just another one of those intellectual hypocrits who passionately defends the Freedom of Speech... except when people state information that liberals don't want to get out to the public.
Julian Petley
E-mail:
Julian.Petley@brunel.ac.uk
Julian Petley lectures in Sociology and Communication in the Department of Human Sciences. His current research interests include media policy and regulation (with a particular emphasis on censorship in its various forms), the British cinema, the British press, and media influence.
Recent books include Ill Effects (co-edited with Martin Barker), Routledge 1997 (substantially revised new edition to be published in October 2000); and Forbidden British Cinema (Vol.3 of The Journal of Popular British Cinema, co-edited with Ian Conrich), Flicks Books, 2000.
Some recent published articles are: 'The cinema and the state, or why Horny Catbabe matters', in the Forbidden British Cinema volume; 'The regulation of media content', in The Media in Britain, Jane Stokes and Anna Reading (eds), Macmillan 1999; 'The pilgrim's regress: the politics of the Boultings' films', in The Films of the Boulting Brothers, Alan Burton and Tim O'Sullivan (eds), Flicks Books 2000; 'Art Cinema', in The Cinema Book (second edition), Pam Cook and Mieke Bernink (eds), British Film Institute 1999; 'Faces for Spaces', in The Journalism Reader, Michael Bromley and Tom O'Malley (eds), Routledge 1997.
Julian Petley is also chair of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom and a member of the editorial boards of the British Journalism Review and the independent media magazine Vertigo.
Future plans include a book on the myth of the 'Loony Left', a study of the film director Michael Reeves, and a history of the 'other' British cinema.
http://www.brunel.ac.uk/depts/hs/cmcr/Staff1JP.htm
49
posted on
05/08/2003 9:22:14 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(I wondered why somebody didn't do something. Then I realized... I am somebody! - Anonymous)
To: ejdrapes
I could scream! This is going to be one heck of a nasty campaign year from the lefties of the world.
To: ejdrapes
51
posted on
05/08/2003 9:39:16 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(I wondered why somebody didn't do something. Then I realized... I am somebody! - Anonymous)
To: ejdrapes
Fox ping!
52
posted on
05/08/2003 11:31:18 PM PDT
by
lainde
To: feinswinesuksass; HangFire; nunya bidness; dighton
"So if we allow into Britain the kind of journalism represented by Fox, that would bring about a form of censorship ."
It's not actually possible that someone said this, is it? My head hurts.
53
posted on
05/10/2003 9:21:12 AM PDT
by
AnnaZ
To: ejdrapes
I was in England right before they got satellite TV. The BBC was says that it was the end of the world. Cat living with dogs, hell on Earth was here.
54
posted on
05/10/2003 9:26:49 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Semper Gumby - Always flexible)
To: AnnaZ
"Dear
Dr. Petley, someone claiming to be you is spouting nonsense."
55
posted on
05/10/2003 9:46:21 AM PDT
by
dighton
(Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Clique, Vulgar Horde)
To: ejdrapes
I believe that's called Censorship. What a surprise.
To: HangFire
57
posted on
05/12/2003 2:25:00 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
To: nutmeg
bttt
58
posted on
05/13/2003 2:24:06 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson