Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary wants to wait until '08, but she may be called on sooner
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | May 4, 2003 | ROBERT NOVAK

Posted on 05/04/2003 3:11:35 AM PDT by sarcasm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2003 3:11:35 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I can see it now: Hillary lands on a moving aircraft carrier-on her broom!
2 posted on 05/04/2003 3:13:12 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (This tagline has been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
"Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel safer yet?"

Lest Americans ever forget why the clintons, and all their enablers need to be hectored, hounded, and harried into silence, until "clintonese is only spoken in Hell," look here:

Warning!

-The Clinton Files--

Liars-- and Sleaze, Incorporated... ( my files on the clintons and friends )


The Holiday *Best* of Bill Clinton & his Friends!

FOB and FOFOB... the clinton friend files


Hodgepodge O' Hillary


3 posted on 05/04/2003 3:17:08 AM PDT by backhoe (Slap the donkey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
There will be no draft -- of Hillary, or anyone else. The article says it outright: there hasn't been a multi-ballot nomination since 1952. The rules are stacked against it. The primaries are front loaded, but that just means that whoever has the most money as of 1/1/04 will be heavily favored, because those who don't have money won't have time to capitalize on any primary victories they might have.
4 posted on 05/04/2003 3:28:11 AM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
She has the FBI files on all of these people also! Look for scandals to come out and ruin every one of those...leaked by Hillary's minions....and then VOILA!! It will be Hillary to the Rescue!!! The stupid Democrats will "BEG" her to run....PLEADING....PLEADING.....PLEASE HILLARY be our SAVIOR!! Little will they know SHE planned it for 2004 in 1992.

Just picture ANY of these as Commander-in-Chief??

5 posted on 05/04/2003 3:33:57 AM PDT by Claire Voyant ((visualize whirled peas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Hillary will run in 2004....the pressure will be on her for running because the current field of losers are...well...losers.

I cant see America voting for this hateful lesbian. The reason she ran in NY because she knew it was the only state she had a chance. She would lose in most states....and by wide margins

If Hitlary were to ever become president....I would leave this country.....until she was gone. Unlike Alec Baldwin, I will do so.
6 posted on 05/04/2003 3:49:41 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (We Buy No French Wine Because Of French Whine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Not likely, Bob, but thanks for getting us all excited anyway...
7 posted on 05/04/2003 3:50:28 AM PDT by NYpeanut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
That settles it for me. Hillary isn't smart enough to know when the democrats are putting up a loser against a winner. She'll fall for it hook, line, and sink-er.
8 posted on 05/04/2003 3:56:44 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claire Voyant
Look for scandals to come out and ruin every one of those...leaked by Hillary's minions.

Kerry has already been exposed as a dolt in the Boston Globe... the bastion of MA liberal/socialism!

Why would they dis the “ketchup boy”... their favorite son?!

Hillary, like rust, never sleeps. Be skeer'ed... be real skeer'ed!

9 posted on 05/04/2003 4:04:45 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Even her fans don't trust her!

You just can't make this stuff up! It has to happen in real life to it be this funny!
10 posted on 05/04/2003 4:05:42 AM PDT by captnemo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Chris Lehane is Kerry's chief flack. What does that tell you (in addition to the fact that Kerry is both a sleaze and an idiot, but we already knew that...)?
11 posted on 05/04/2003 4:06:53 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
Senator MOAB (Mother Of All bitches) does NOTHING unless it is a sure thing.
12 posted on 05/04/2003 4:07:03 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (Even a woodpecker owes his success to the fact that he uses his head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
Don't forget Arkancide.
13 posted on 05/04/2003 4:13:24 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Hillary! (first elected federal official with no last name) might run in '04, but before she decided to do so, she'd undoubtedly want the "Fortinbras Effect" -- internecine slaughter among her chief competitors -- to reap its maximum benefits. There's a lot to be said for letting your rivals kill one another off to the greatest extent possible, and reserving your strength to finish off the exhausted survivors.

That having been said, as long as Dubya doesn't commit a major gaffe of the kind Bush the Elder committed in raising taxes, Hillary! has essentially no chance to defeat him. If I'm right, we should hope she runs, as it would devalue her candidacy for 2008, when the GOP has to come up with a new candidate.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason:
http://palaceofreason.com

14 posted on 05/04/2003 4:14:01 AM PDT by fporretto (Curmudgeon Emeritus, Palace of Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
If Hillary were to reveal anything near the truth in her book about her years in the white house, we would see her for what she really was, nothing more than a towel girl in Bubba's whorehouse. I agree with Rush. Bring her on now. The sooner she runs the sooner she will be defeated and the sooner we can be rid of her.
15 posted on 05/04/2003 4:15:52 AM PDT by Larsen E. Whipsnade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
Hillary will run in 2004...

I disagree. I don't think she wants to run against GWB.

The reason she ran in NY because she knew it was the only state she had a chance. She would lose in most states....and by wide margins.

I agree totally with this. Also, NY has virtually no residency requirement and she had the benefit of running against the "B-team".

16 posted on 05/04/2003 4:21:41 AM PDT by libertylover (Grateful to all who have served.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
What I mean is, HRC can't run for the nomination.

Too dangerous, too exposed, for too long. She won't be like Bill, the day she announces is the day Operation Save America goes into gear, 24/7/365.

Operation Infinite Freep will pale into insignificance beside Operation Ditch the B*tch.

So, she has to be the RAT candidate for the shortest time possible (like October 15-November 2, 2004).

How to accomplish this? and why are the Xlintons supporting John Edwards? (I take it as a given that HRC knows she has to run in 2004 or not at all-she is not aging gracefully).

If Candidate Edwards meets with Arkancide at the hands of a right-wing NRA loving pro life white male on or about October 10, 2004, and HRC is forced against her will to come forward to save a grief-stricken Party, remember you read it here first.

17 posted on 05/04/2003 4:21:44 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Bring it on!!!

Both GOP Tsuanami blowouts were repudiations to the Clintons. Tsunami 94 was in reponse to Hillary Care and Tsuanmi 02 was a complete repudiation of the Clinton Legacy which helped setup 911.

If Hitlery runs in 04, she'll get absolutely crushed! Talk about negative turnout!!!

18 posted on 05/04/2003 4:25:05 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
The reason she ran in NY because she knew it was the only state she had a chance. She would lose in most states....and by wide margins. I agree totally with this

I think this is wishful thinking on your part.

If the race were held today, HRC would get 40-43% of the vote nationwide.

Now consider-do you know any group of 100 people where 43 of them would vote for HRC?

No, you don't, and neither do I-so we both are substantially underdiscerning the HRC vote.

Add to this that she will have (media) air superiority and that her campaign will be very unconventional in design, relying on deception and "shock and awe" (see my post #17), and there is ample reason to worry.

19 posted on 05/04/2003 4:26:06 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Jim, nonsense. HRC will get crushed! Take it from someone who was on record here saying that there would be a huge GOP blowout in 02, when most said it would be too close to call. We did.
20 posted on 05/04/2003 4:30:47 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson