Skip to comments.
California Gun Owners face $0.10 Tax on each round of ammo.
California Waterfowl Association ^
| 5/3/3
| Varmint Al
Posted on 05/03/2003 10:00:41 AM PDT by Varmint Al
CA Gun Owners.. Help Defeat this!!
Ten Cent Ammo Tax on Every Piece of Ammunition
AB 992 was voted on by the Assembly Public Safety Committee on April 8th and passed 5 to 2! The next committee hearing is scheduled for April 29th in the Assembly Health Committee. Your letters of opposition are needed NOW!, Click here for a sample letter, committee list, and more.
TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; california; gun; tax; thechildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
To: FreedomCalls
Can't. They have customs inspectors at the state border crossings, but since that would be unconstitutional, they call them "agricultural inspection stations" instead.They are not customs inspectors, they are exactly what they say they are, agricultural inspectors. I have been back and forth across the border numerous times, sometimes with firearms in my vehicle. Because I have California plates, I haven't even been stopped every time. When I do stop, they ask if I have any fruit, vegetables or plants, and where I'm coming from. If I have some fruit, I tell them. If it's citrus, they want to look at it. That's it. They've never asked to look at anything else, or asked me to pop the trunk, or anything else. I here this often on these thread, but it's simply not true that these guys will search your car and take your guns. Not that I'm trying to defend what California is doing in other arenas, I'm not, but this is one thing that just isn't true. And if the .10 fee (yeah, they're calling it a fee to get around the 2/3 vote for a tax) passes, I'll be going to Reno several times a year to um, gamble. And the car will be coming back with a load on. And I won't be worried about the agricultural inspectors.
61
posted on
05/03/2003 7:18:32 PM PDT
by
.38sw
To: CurlyDave
Does anyone know if it is $0.10 per loaded round, or $0.10 per bullet? The bill says .10 per munition, and defines it as bullet, primer, and case. But if you buy a manufactured round, it's .10 per. So forget handloading.
62
posted on
05/03/2003 7:20:39 PM PDT
by
.38sw
To: RightWhale
What about the $10 brick of 22 ammo? If my math is correct and this story correct and if the bill passes, then that $10 brick goes to $60.00 ($10 + tax)
63
posted on
05/03/2003 7:25:51 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: Travis McGee
I look at "per bullet" taxes kind of like recycling "redemption value" taxes. If you return your bullet to the government in a Constitutionally approved fashion, you should get your bullet tax refunded. Of course, if everyone tries to cash in their bullets at once, you probably won't get paid...
64
posted on
05/03/2003 7:26:43 PM PDT
by
tortoise
To: TheAngryClam
Or, you can just get the hell out of that lousy left wing commie state and let the socialists cannibalize themselves!!
To: hedgetrimmer
Pretty soon there will be no where else to go. Fleeing to the countryside to escape the plague doesn't help if you have fleas in the blankets you brought with you. I think we're pretty much there already. In my case, fleeing California was the result of (roughly in order) high taxes, high housing prices, high availability of drugs in the places I( could afford (though the firstborn was only 1 at the time), high temperatures, and a few other things. Washington was a good move at the time.
But I look around now, and I see how much more power the feds have acquired in the last couple of decades, thanks to their practice of doling out monies to states who obey their diktats, and withholding funds from states who don't toe the mark, and.. well, frankly, there's nowhere in the country to go.
(Last year I showed a state legislative committee how a certain bill proposed to meet a federal requirement that would have cost the state one million dollars per annum in federal funds if they didn't meet it, would cost them considerably more than $1M, albeit indirectly. The bill is now law. Reminds me a bit, though I do not quite agree, of the poet Robinson Jeffer's "Shine, Perishing Republic.)
66
posted on
05/03/2003 7:44:00 PM PDT
by
Eala
(irrelevant (î-rèl´e-vent) 1: The UN 2: France 3: CNN 4: Tim Robbins 5: Chretien)
To: Varmint Al
"Ammo dealers follow the law. They would have to collect the Fee before they could sell the ammo to California customers." How far a drive is it from where you are to Nevada or Oregon?
To: Constitutional Patriot
Soon.
I have two more years of law school.
68
posted on
05/03/2003 8:38:37 PM PDT
by
TheAngryClam
(This space for rent.)
To: Varmint Al
Please help with your letters. I have heard that they have changed the bill so that it is a "fee" instead of a tax so it will only take a majority vote to pass. Note also Article I section 9: No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any state.
69
posted on
05/03/2003 8:41:12 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: Jeff Gordon
I already buy my ammunition from out of state via the internetCould you post the site?
70
posted on
05/03/2003 8:42:14 PM PDT
by
paul51
To: paul51
This is the my most often used source:
http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/ctd/default.asp
Others are:
http://www.cascade-ammo.com/
http://www.outlandsales.com/
http://www.black-hills.com/
To: Riverman94610
Why keep altering your life just to comply with yet another un-Constitutional, socialist wet dream?
It's time to put some real fear into these politicians.(use your imagination.)
72
posted on
05/03/2003 9:22:05 PM PDT
by
wcbtinman
(Metus improbos compescit, non clementia. (Fear, not kindness, restrains the wicked.))
To: Jeff Gordon
Thank you
73
posted on
05/04/2003 8:05:51 AM PDT
by
paul51
To: All
I have noted that some of the posters have proposed solutions that are less than legal. I would not even consider using these options. As a gun owner, I will follow the law, even though it is stupid. The only way I would violate the law would be with a "test case" and with the intent to take it to court to challenge the law. Is not our justice system setup so that it requires a violation of a law for it to be tested in court? Please correct me if I am wrong.
As it is, legal gun owners are required to be meticulous in following the law, lest they lose their Gun Rights altogether. And I intend to remain a legal gun owner.
Good Hunting... from Varmint Al
To: dufekin
Many in authority in California consider it's citizens to only have the priviledges they wish to grant. The state is one of a halfway tyranny in my opinion. The Democrats are flushing the state down the toilet which is why I left in 2002.
May the Lord bless you if you live there.
75
posted on
05/05/2003 4:11:55 AM PDT
by
2nd_Amendment_Defender
("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
To: xusafflyer
Tax all you want California. We're leaving this state for good. Keep pushing all the people that have money out of the state. What state you moving to?
76
posted on
05/05/2003 4:13:57 AM PDT
by
2nd_Amendment_Defender
("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
To: Tailback
This tax will greatly hurt the Federal Firearms Licensed Dealers in California if it is passed. No one will buy ammunition from those who sell firearms. This will probably force many of the gun shops out of business then where will you buy a gun if you live in this state? Private party transfers of guns I hear are illegal in California.
77
posted on
05/05/2003 4:19:30 AM PDT
by
2nd_Amendment_Defender
("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
To: TheAngryClam
If this passes, it's time to go buy myself a couple thousand rounds.
The salutary thing is that this bill, if signed into law, will do wonders for the gun industry in Nevada.
California Democrats are nothing if not stupid. The smuggling industry that this will create will be remarkable.
Expect the local Triad and Yakuza soldiers to do a brisk business in smuggling.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
78
posted on
05/05/2003 4:43:36 AM PDT
by
section9
(Major Kusanagi: back from vacation! Tanned, rested, and ready.....)
To: Eala
I think we're pretty much there already. In my case, fleeing California was the result of (roughly in order) high taxes, high housing prices, high availability of drugs in the places I( could afford (though the firstborn was only 1 at the time), high temperatures, and a few other things. Washington was a good move at the time. But I look around now...You raise a very good point that all of us need to ponder- America is the last bastion of freedom.
If America falls too far under the left wing's thrall... there's nowhere else to run to.
79
posted on
05/05/2003 5:29:54 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: Varmint Al
"And I intend to remain a legal gun owner."So what will you do when the govt makes you an illegal gun owner, as govt in various states have done? Just because some govt body passes a "law" doesn't make it legal.
After 60 some years of increasing gun control, it should be fairly obvious that politicians have little fear of the consequences as they continuously chip away at our rights. To continue this fight in the courts is the true definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
I'm not proposing any kind of action, I'm just saying that the traditional methods haven't and will not work.
80
posted on
05/05/2003 6:54:07 AM PDT
by
wcbtinman
(Metus improbos compescit, non clementia. (Fear, not kindness, restrains the wicked.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson