Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PBS Offers Intelligent Design Documentary
CREATION - Evolution Headlines ^ | 04/28/2003 | Illustra Media/CREATION - Evolution Headlines

Posted on 05/02/2003 10:26:29 AM PDT by Remedy

According to Illustra Media, the Public Broadcasting System uploaded the film Unlocking the Mystery of Life to its satellite this past Sunday. For the next three years, it will be available for member stations to download and broadcast. In addition, PBS is offering the film on their Shop PBS website under Science/Biology videos (page 4).

The film, released a little over a year ago, has been called a definitive presentation of the Intelligent Design movement. With interviews and evidences from eight PhD scientists, it presents strictly scientific (not religious) arguments that challenge Darwinian evolution, and show instead that intelligent design is a superior explanation for the complexity of life, particularly of DNA and molecular machines. The film has been well received not only across America but in Russia and other countries. Many public school teachers are using the material in science classrooms without fear of controversies over creationism or religion in the science classroom, because the material is scientific, not religious, in all its arguments and evidences, and presents reputable scientists who are well qualified in their fields: Dean Kenyon, Michael Behe, Jonathan Wells, Steven Meyer, William Dembski, Scott Minnich, Jed Macosko, and Paul Nelson, with a couple of brief appearances by Phillip E. Johnson, the "founder" of the Intelligent Design movement.

Check with your local PBS Station to find out when they plan to air it. If it is not on their schedule, call or write and encourage them to show the film. Why should television partly supported by public tax funds present only a one-sided view on this subject, so foundational to all people believe and think? We applaud PBS's move, but it is only partial penance for the Evolution series and decades of biased reporting on evolution.


This is a wonderful film, beautifully edited and shot on many locations, including the Galápagos Islands, and scored to original music by Mark Lewis. People are not only buying it for themselves, but buying extra copies to show to friends and co-workers. Unlocking the Mystery of Life available here on our Products page in VHS and DVD formats. The film is about an hour long and includes vivid computer graphics of DNA in action. The DVD version includes an extra half-hour of bonus features, including answers to 14 frequently-asked questions about intelligent design, answered by the scientists who appear in the film.


This is a must-see video. Get it, and get it around.


Intelligent Design Gets a Powerful New Media Boost 03/09/2002
Exclusive Over 600 guests gave a standing ovation Saturday March 9 at the premiere of a new film by Illustra Media, Unlocking the Mystery of Life. This 67-minute documentary is in many ways a definitive portrayal of the Intelligent Design movement that is sweeping the country. Intelligent Design is a non-religious, non-sectarian, strictly scientific view of origins with both negative and positive arguments: negative, that Darwinism is insufficient to explain the complexity of life, and positive, that intelligent design, or information, is a fundamental entity that must be taken into consideration in explanations of the origin of complex, specified structures like DNA. The film features interviews with a Who's Who of the Intelligent Design movement: Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, Jonathan Wells, Paul Nelson, Stephen Meyer, Dean Kenyon, William Dembski, and others, who explain the issues and arguments for intelligent design as the key to unlocking the mystery of life. The film also features nearly 20 minutes of award-quality computer animation of molecular machines, manufacturing plants, and storage libraries of elaborate information - DNA and proteins at work in the cell, climaxing with a dazzling view of DNA transcription and translation.
In his keynote address, Dr. Paul Nelson (who appears in the film), gave reasons for optimism. He said that Time Magazine, usually solidly Darwinian, admitted just last week that these Intelligent Design scientists may be onto something. U.S. News and World Report is also coming out with a piece on I.D. And Stephen Meyer, who also appears in the film, could not be at the premiere because he was on his way to Ohio (see next headline), armed with copies of the film to give to the school board members. Nelson said that scientists should not arbitrarily rule design off the table. "Keeping science from discovering something that might be true is like having a pair of spectacles that distorts your vision," he said. "It does profound harm to science." He described how Ronald Numbers, evolutionist, once told him that design might be true, but science is a game, with the rule that scientists cannot even consider the possibility of design; "that's just the way it is," he said. (See this quote by Richard Lewontin for comparison.) Yet design is already commonly considered in archaeology, cryptography, forensics, and SETI, so why not in biology? Apparently this arbitrary rule has become a national controversy. Intelligent Design, says Nelson, is finally removing a "rule of the game" that is hindering science. If the reaction of the crowd at the premiere luncheon was any indication, Unlocking the Mystery of Life has launched a well-aimed smart weapon at the citadels of Darwinism.

We highly recommend this film. Copies are just now becoming available for $20. Visit IllustraMedia.com and order it. View it, and pass it around. Share it with your teachers, your co-workers, your church. You will have no embarrassment showing this high-quality, beautiful, amazing film to anyone, even the most ardent evolutionist.

 

 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; crevo; crevolist; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 881-887 next last
To: shawne
I'm out for the night too. Good night shawne.
361 posted on 05/03/2003 4:22:40 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: shawne
I am done. Good night all. Dimensio helps me rest my case. I asked for any samples. ANY. He turned that into "demanding a 100% complete chart of every 'transitional' species in existence, the last desperate refuge of a defeated creationist."

You were given links to evidence of transitionals. You turned your nose at them and demanded more. That's the typical creationist "rebuttal", but now that you've been exposed you're going to run away with your tail between your legs, afraid that if you're exposed to too much evidence you won't be able to keep believing the fairy tales that you've been swallowing and then you'll be lying when you try to argue against evolution with the same tired old oft-refuted canards. Naturally, of coure, you have to pretend that no one offered you any links (even though anyone could go through this discussion and point out at least three), so you lie about not receiving any evidence, meaning that you've already failed at your goal of not being truly dishonest. Have a nice day.
362 posted on 05/03/2003 4:24:03 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: shawne
VadeRetro: What mechanism prevents changes from ever being beneficial? What mechanism prevents changes from adding up? What evidence do you have for these assertions?

shawne: what evidence do you have to counter?

First of all, when you assert that "no changes are beneficial," you imply the existence of some mechanism to prevent some random change from being beneficial to the organism. Otherwise, why wouldn't a change be lucky once in a blue moon? Similarly, when you assert that "no random changes accumulate," you imply the existence of some mechanism that prevents same, since you have already admitted the occurrence of said random changes. If you can't come up with a plausible and defensible mechanism in each case, I'm not going to give you a free pass just because you'd like to slough the burden of proof on me. You remain tasked with identifying mechanisms and with providing evidence for their existence. Your request for a free pass is denied.

As it happens, however, there is a vast amount of evidence that microevolutionary changes accumulate to macro.

Tempo and Mode of Speciation (A slide show for newbies like yourself)
29 Evidences for Macroevolution (Good but long overview)
Some links on "Where are the transitionals?"
There's plenty more, but try to actually follow the links and read on that for a bit.
363 posted on 05/03/2003 4:27:47 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

Comment #364 Removed by Moderator

To: Dataman
On what scientific basis or evidence can you assume an ultimate being would be subject to the physical laws of the universe that He created?

Assuming, of course, that an ultimate being outside our universe actually created the universe. There is mud outside my window, but as far as I know it only required water and dirt. It may be man made mud or maybe it is just raining, but its existence alone is not proof one way or the other.

I would point out that, knowing so little about how our own universe actually works, we have no basis to assume that something is or isn't possible within our own universe (though this is the strongest claim we CAN make in a Bayesian sense). Or what laws do and don't apply both inside and out. Or whether it was intentionally created or a side-effect of some other activity by an ultimate being. Or whether a ultimate being exists just outside our universe; for all we know the closest thing to an ultimate being lives two universe abstractions up and isn't really even cognizant of our universe underneath the one He is aware of. Basically, all we have is a Star Trek episode with better writing.

365 posted on 05/03/2003 4:37:12 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
I would point out that, knowing so little about how our own universe actually works, we have no basis to assume that something is or isn't possible within our own universe

I've seen this used as an 'argument' by some (not all, or even many) creationists. We cannot know for certain that there are no gods because we do not know what is and is not possible within the universe. Therefore the Christian God exists.

Basically, all we have is a Star Trek episode with better writing.


Oh, like that's difficult.
366 posted on 05/03/2003 4:39:53 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: general_re
You know, it just occurred to me that there's really no evidence of transitional positions for the continents - all we have is extrapolation from their current movements.
---

I like it. I think I'll call my theory "Intelligent Drift", and demand equal time in earth science classrooms around the country.
Intelligent Drift. Very well done! Creationism is never having to connect the dots.
367 posted on 05/03/2003 4:40:05 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
I don't see how inland seashells are anything but evidence of a global flood.

Because the "inland seashells" are from *multiple different time periods* -- and the times even vary from place to place. If there were a global flood, there would be a large layer of seashells in all places, all in a single strata that measured to the same time period. Furthermore, even single locations will often have a layer of sea shells, with a layer of geologic formation on top of that which can only be formed under *dry* conditions, followed by another layer of sea shells. Kind of hard to explain *that* by invoking a one-time global flood.

To even suggest that their presence is evidence of continental drift is preposterous.

And yet, that's exactly what the enormous amounts of geological evidence indicates, to the exclusion of any "global flood" hypothesis. Deal with it.

Here's what North America, Africa, and Europe looked like 390 million years ago:

(Image courtesy of the excellent Paleomap Project website, which is a good starting point for education about how the Earth has changed over time, and how we know.)

The light blue areas are shallow seas, which as you'll notice cover most of what are today "inland" areas.

Even as recently as 80 million years ago there were extensive "inland seas":

How do we know this is what the Earth was like 390 (or 80) million years ago? From careful reconstruction from literally millions of pieces of data acquired from such independent sources as paleomagnetism, linear magnetic anomalies, paleobiogeography, paleoclimatology, geologic and tectonic history, and the nature of various geologic strata from location to location.

Reconstructions of the configuration of the Earth in the past are based on such research and measurements as:

Barron, E.J., Fawcett, P.J., Pollard, D., and Thompson, S., 1994. Model simulations of Cretaceous climates: the role of geography and carbon dioxide, in J.R.L. Allen, B.J. Hoskins, B.W. Sellwood, R.A. Spicer, and P.J. Valdes (eds), Palaeoclimates and their Modelling: with special reference to the Mesozoic era, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 99-107.

Bertrande, G., and Scotese, C.R., 1993. Plate Tectonic Reconstructions of Southeast Asia (0-40 ma). PALEOMAP Project Progress Report 55, pp.

Bocharova, N. Yu., 1993. Plate Tectonic Evolution of the CIS (former Soviet Union), PALEOMAP Project Report 57-1293, 28 pp.

Bocharova N. Yu., and Scotese, C.R., 1993. Revised Global Apparent Polar Wander Paths and Global Mean Poles, PALEOMAP Project Progress Report 56-1293, 20 pp.

Boucot. A.J., Xu, C., and Scotese, C.R., (in prep), Atlas of Lithological Indicators of Climate, Geol. Soc. Amer. Special Paper.

Cocks, L.R.M., McKerrow, W.S., and van Staal, C.R., 1997. The margins of Avalonia, Geol. Mag., 134 (5), 627-634.

Cook, P.J., 1990. Australia: Evolution of a Continent, BMR Palaeogeographic Group, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 97 pp.

Cook, T.D., and Bally, A.W., 1975. Stratigraphic Atlas of North and Central America, Princeton University Press, 272 pp.

Dalziel, I.W. D., 1991. Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctica-Australia as a conjugate rift pair: Evidence and implications for an Eocambrian supercontinent, Geology, 19: 598-601.

Dalziel, I.W.D., 1997. Neoproterozoic-Paleozoic geography and tectonics: review, hypothesis and environmental speculation, Geol. Soc. Amer. bull., 109:16-42.

Dercourt, J., Ricou, L.E., and Vrielynck, B., (eds), 1993. Atlas Tethys Palaeoenvironmental Maps. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 307 p., 14 maps, 1 pl.

Fawcett, P. J., Barron, E.J., Robinson, V.D., and Katz, B.J., 1994. The climatic evolurion of India and Australia from the Late Permian to mid-Jurassic: a comparision of climate model results with the geologic record, in G.D. Klein (ed.), Pangea: Paleoclimate, Tectonics, and Sedimentation during Accretion, Zenith, and Breakup of a Supercontinent, Geol. Soc. America Special Paper 288, 139-157.

Friedman, R. M., 1983. Accretionary History of Western North America during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Eras, Master Thesis, University of Chicago, 512 pp.

Gahagan, L.M., Scotese, C.R., Royer, J.-Y., Sandwell, D.T., Winn, J.K., Tomlins, R. L., Ross, M.I., Newman, J.S., Mueller, R.D., Mayes, C.L., Lawver, L.A., and Heubeck, C.E., 1988. Tectonic fabric of the ocean basins from satellite altimetry data, in C.R. Scotese and W. W. Sager (eds), Mesozoic and Cenozoic plate reconstructions, Tectonophysics, 155: 1-26.

Golonka, J., Ross, M.I., and Scotese, C.R., 1994. Phanerozoic paleogeographic and paleoclimatic modeling maps, in A.F. Embry, B. Beauchamp, and D.J. Glass (eds), PANGEA: Global Environments and Resources, Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol., Memoir 17, pp. 1-48.

Hall, R., and Blundell, D.J., 1996. Tectonic Evoluiton of Southeast Asia, Geological Soc. of London, Special Publ. No. 106, London, pp. 566.

Hoffman, P.F., 1991. Did the breakout of Laurentia turn Gondwanaland inside out?, Science, 252:1409-1412.

Hulver, M., 1985. Cretaceous Marine Paleogeography of Africa, Master's Thesis, University of Chicago.

Hutchison, C. S., 1989. Geological Evolution of South-east Asia, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 368 pp.

Jurdy, D.M., Stefanick, M., and Scotese, C.R., 1995. Paleozoic plate dynamics, J. Geophys. Res., 100: 17965-17975.

Kutzbach, J.E., and Ziegler, A.M., 1994. Simulation of Late Permian climate and biomes with an atmosphere-ocean model: comparisons and observations, in J.R.L. Allen, B.J. Hoskins, B.W. Sellwood, R.A. Spicer, and P.J. Valdes (eds), Palaeoclimates and their Modelling: with special reference to the Mesozoic era, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 119-132.

MacNiocall, C., van der Pluijm, and van der Voo, R., 1997. Ordovician paleogeography and the evolution of the Iapetus Ocean, Geology 25: 159-162.

McKerrow, W.S, and Scotese, C.R., 1990. Palaeozoic Biogeography and Paleogeography, Geological Society of London, Memoir 12, 435 pp.

McKerrow, W.S., Scotese, C.R., and Brasier, M.F., 1992. Early Cambrian continental reconstructions, J. Geol. Soc., London, 149: 599-606.

Meert, J.G., and Van der Voo, R., 1994. The Neoproterozoic (1000 - 540 Ma) glacial intervals: No more snowball earth?, Earth Planet. Sci. Letters, 123: 1-13.

Monger, J.W.H., and Nokleberg, W.J., 1996. Evolution of the northern North American Cordillera: generation, fragementation, displacement and accretion of successive North American plate-margin arcs, in Coyner, A.R., and Fahey, P.L., eds., Geology and Ore Deposits of the American Cordillera, Geol. Soc. Nevada Sympos. Proceedings, Reno/Sparks, Nevada, April 1995, p. 1133-1152.

Moores, E.M., 1991. Southwest U.S. - East Antarctica (SWEAT) connection: A hypothesis, Geology, 19: 425-428.

Mueller, R.D., Roest, W.R., Royer, J.-Y., Gahagan, L.M., and Sclater, J.G., 1996. Age of the Ocean Floor, Report MGG-12, Data Announcement 96-MGG-04, National Geophy. Data Center, Boulder, Co.

Mueller, R.D., Royer, J.-Y., Lawver, L.A., 1994. Revised plate motions relative to hot spots from combined Atlantic and Indian Ocean hotspot tracks, Geology. X

Nie, S., Rowley, D.B., and Ziegler, A.M., 1990. Constraints on the location of the Asian microcontinents in the Palaeo-Tethys during the Late Palaeozoic, In: W.S. McKerrow and C. R. Scotese, eds., Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography, Geological Society of London, Memoir 12, pp. 397-410.

Otto-Bliesner, B.L., Becker, E., Becker, N., 1994. Atlas of Phanerozoic Paleoclimate Simulated by a Global Climate Model, Center for Earth System History, Report #1, November 1994, University of Texas at Arlington, 148 pp.

Parrish, J.T., 1982. Upwelling and petroleum source beds, with reference to the Paleozoic. Amer. Assoc. Petro. Geol., 66: 750-774.

Parrish, J.T., Ziegler, A.M., and Scotese, C.R., 1982. Rainfall patterns and the distribution of coals and evaporites in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, Palaeogeog., Palaeoclim., Palaeoecol., 40: 67-101.

Powell, C.McA., Li, Z.X., McElhinny, M.W., Meert, J.G., and Park, J.K., 1993. Paleomagnetic constraints on the timing of the Neoproterozoic breakup of Rodinia and the Cambrian formation of Gondwana, Geology, 21: 889-892.

Rangin, C., Jolivet, L., Pubellier, M., and the Tethys Pacific working group, 1990. A simple model for the tectonic evolution of southeast Asia and Indonesia region for the past 43 m.y., Bull. Soc. geol. France, (8), t.VI, N.X, pp. 889-905.

Ronov, A., Khain, V., and Seslavinsky, K., 1984. Atlas of Lithological-Paleogeographical Maps of the World, Late Precambrian and Paleozoic of Continents, U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, 70 pp.

Ronov, A., Khain, V., and Balukhovsky, 1989. Atlas of Lithological-Paleogeographical Maps of the World, Mesozoic and Cenozoic of Continents and Oceans, U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, 79 pp.

Rowley, D.B., 1992. Reconstructions of the Circum-Pacific Region, in G.E.G. Westermann (editor), The Jurassic of the Circum-Pacific, Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-18.

Scotese, C.R. , 1975. Continental Drift, 1st edition, Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Chicago.

Scotese, C.R., 1976. A continental drift "flip book", Computers and Geology, 2:113-116.

Scotese, C.R., 1997. Continental Drift, 7th edition, PALEOMAP Project, Arlington, Texas, 79 pp.

Scotese, C.R., and Baker, D.W., 1975. Continental drift reconstructions and animations, J. Geol. Education, 23:167-171.

Scotese, C.R., and Barrett, S.F., 1990. Gondwana's movement over the South pole during the Palaeozoic: evidence from lithological indicators of climate, in W.S. McKerrow and C. R. Scotese, eds., Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography, Geological Society of London, Memoir 12, pp. 75-86.

Scotese, C.R., and Golonka, J. 1992. Paleogeographic Atlas, PALEOMAP Progress Report 20-0692, Department of Geology, University of Texas at Arlington, 34 pp.

Scotese, C.R., and Langford, R. P., 1995. Pangea and the Palegeography of the Permian, in P.A. Scholle, T.M. Peryt, and D.S. Ulmer-Scholle, eds., The Permian of Northern Pangea, volume 1, Paleogeography, Paleoclimates, nad Stratigraphy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 3-19.

Scotese, C.R., and Ross, M.I., (in prep.), An Atlas of Paleoclimate Simulations using the Parametric Climate Model (PCM).

Scotese, C.R., and Sager, W.W., 1988. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Plate Tectonic Reconstructions. Tectonophysics, 155: 27-48.

Scotese, C.R., and Summerhayes, 1986. A computer model of paleoclimate to predict upwelling in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Geobyte, 1:28-42.

Scotese, C.R., Gahagan, L.M., and Larson, R. L., 1988. Plate tectonic reconstructions of the Cretaceous and Cenozoic ocean basins, in C.R. Scotese and W. W. Sager (eds), Mesozoic and Cenozoic plate reconstructions, Tectonophysics, 155: 27-48.

Scotese, C.R., Snelson, S., Ross, W.C., and Dodge, L., 1981. A computer animation of continental drift, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 32: suppl. III, 61-70.

Scotese, C.R., Bambach, R.K., Barton, C., Van der Voo, R., and Ziegler, A.M., 1979. Paleozoic Base Maps, J. Geology, 87: 217-277.

Sengor, A. M. C., 1996. Paleotectonics of Asia: fragments of a synthesis, in An Yin and Mark Harrison (eds.), The Tectonic Evolution of Asia, pp. 486-641.

Smith, A.G., Smith, D.G., and Funnell, B.M., 1994. Atlas of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Coastlines, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 99 pp.

Storey, B.C., King, E.C., and Livermore, R.A., 1996. Weddell Sea Tectonics and Gondwana Break-up, Geol. Soc. London Special Publ. No. 108, London, 284 pp.

Valdes, P. J., and Sellwood, B.W., 1992. A paleoclimate model for the Kimmeridgian, Palaeo geog., Palaeoclim., Palaeoecol., 95: 47-72.

Van der Voo, R., 1993. Paleomagnetism of the Atlantic, Tethys, and Iapetus Oceans, Cambridghe University Press, Cambridge, 411 pp.

Wang, H., 1985. Atlas of the Paleogeography of China, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan College of Geology, Cartographic Publishing House, Beijing, 143 pp.

Yin, A., and Nie, Shangyouy, 1996. A Phanerozoic palinspastic reconstruction of China and its neighboring regions, in An Yin and Mark Harrison (eds.), The Tectonic Evolution of Asia, pp. 442-486.

Ziegler, A.M., Scotese, C.R., and Barrett, S.F., 1983. Mesozoic and Cenozoic paleogeographic maps, in Tidal Friction and the Earth's Rotation II, P. Broche / J. Sundermann, Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Ziegler, A.M., Hulver, M.L., and Rowley, D.B., 1996. Permian World Topography and Climate, in I.P. Martini (ed.), Late Glacial and Postglacial Environmental Changes - Quaternary, Carboniferous-Permian and Proterozoic, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

Ziegler, P.A., 1989. Evolution of Laurussia: a study in late Paleozoic plate tectonics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 102 pp.

Ziegler, P.A., 1990. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe, 2nd and completely revised edition, Shell International Petro. Maatschappi B.V., Geological Society Publishing House, Bath, 239 pp., 56 enclosures.

Zonenshain, L., Kuzmin, M.I., and Natapov, L.M., 1990. Geology of the U.S.S.R.: A Plate Tectonic Synthesis. American Geophysical Union, Geodynamics Series, 21: 1-242.

Excuse me if I tend to take their findings as carrying more weight than whatever you, or any other creationist, personally finds "preposterous", especially since you're clearly not familiar with even the most basic forms of the available evidence.
368 posted on 05/03/2003 4:42:35 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: shawne
I want to see intermediaries of fish to elephant...come on.

You can do that here, at the Vertebrate Transitionals FAQ.

Start with "Fishes to first amphibians." Then, if you're in a hurry, you bypass transitions among amphibians and skip ahead to transitions from amphibians to first reptiles. In the same mode, you skip transitions among reptiles, hopping to transition from reptiles to first mammals. Then you go to Condylarths (first hooved mammals), then elephants.

That's all it takes for an outline. If you want more info on any particular species, you slam it into Yahoo or Google.

Again, what is the evidence that anything else is happening?

369 posted on 05/03/2003 4:43:29 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

Comment #370 Removed by Moderator

To: general_re
On what logical or rhetorical basis do you get to shift the burden of proof away from the person making the original argument?

We both approach the subject from our own world views. Some aspects of our existence are problematic for one world view but not another.

For example, the concept "before time" is used althoug meaningless to the secular materialist, but not to the creationist.

Another example would be the existence of matter, energy and information. Again not a problem to the creationist, but a migraine for the secular materialist.

The problems are due to world view assumptions. Creationists are allowed to "assume" a Creator (even though we have good evidence we will call it an assumption for now). Since we assume a Creator, that Creator is not limited nor can be logically limited by the materialist world view.

This is rather basic and should be relatively simple to comprehend; that the universe was created means de facto that the Creator not only exists outside the universe but before the universe. It also follows that the creation of the universe and its laws must necessarily be a subset of essential existence and its laws.

So the original question, "Who designed the Designer?" makes certain assumptions that are tied to the materialist world view, such as everything is subject to the laws of the universe. That's baggage from your world view, as I said and the question only seems to make sense so long as the invalid assumptions from the baggage are in place.

371 posted on 05/03/2003 4:45:03 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

Comment #372 Removed by Moderator

To: Dimensio
I've seen this used as an 'argument' by some (not all, or even many) creationists. We cannot know for certain that there are no gods because we do not know what is and is not possible within the universe. Therefore the Christian God exists.

Also known as the "God of the gaps" philosophy, since it postulates that God may still be lurking somewhere in the areas where there are gaps in our knowledge about the universe.

373 posted on 05/03/2003 4:45:36 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

Comment #374 Removed by Moderator

To: Dimensio
We cannot know for certain that there are no gods because we do not know what is and is not possible within the universe. Therefore the Christian God exists.

That reasoning allows an equal probability that I am God, and that I just like to drop in to FR from time to time. However, I can neither confirm nor deny that such an assertion is true at this time.

375 posted on 05/03/2003 4:46:17 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
for all we know the closest thing to an ultimate being lives two universe abstractions up and isn't really even cognizant of our universe underneath the one He is aware of. Basically, all we have is a Star Trek episode with better writing.

The Impersonal gives rise to the personal? How do you explain that one?

376 posted on 05/03/2003 4:47:28 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Actually he is not a Creationist.
377 posted on 05/03/2003 4:48:02 PM PDT by BMCDA (Atheists do not so much reject God as bad arguments in His favor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: shawne
My grandfather's words: "Hmmm, I am hungry, I think I will grow a mouth. Hmmm, I need someplace to store the food, I will grow a stomach. Gotta get rid of the excess food, let's grow an a$$. Now how much sense does that make boy?"

None whatsoever--your grandfather was either ignorant, or intentionally setting up a strawman to get a desired reaction from you.

378 posted on 05/03/2003 4:54:38 PM PDT by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
So the original question, "Who designed the Designer?" makes certain assumptions that are tied to the materialist world view, such as everything is subject to the laws of the universe.

My question is "why insist upon assuming a designer"?
379 posted on 05/03/2003 4:54:58 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
I love what Dr. Colin Patterson, Senior Palaentologist for the British Museum of Natural History in London, said after it suddenly dawned on him that he knew no one sure thing in support of evolution: it is "a void that has the function of knowledge but conveys none." (Thompson, Bert, Ph.D., The Scientific Case for Creation, Montgomery: Apologetics Press, 1986, p.13)
380 posted on 05/03/2003 4:55:34 PM PDT by discipler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 881-887 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson