Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Same-sex measure easily clears House (Texas stops the homo agenda cold)
Houston Chronicle ^ | May 1, 2003, 6:57AM | JANET ELLIOTT

Posted on 05/01/2003 6:59:24 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob

AUSTIN -- A Senate bill prohibiting the recognition of same-sex unions won approval by the House on Wednesday.

Senate Bill 7, the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, now heads to Gov. Rick Perry, who is expected to sign it into law.

The final vote in the House was 118-9.

Texas law currently states that marriage can be only between a man and a woman.

"This bill does discriminate against any other kind of marriage," said Rep. Warren Chisum, R-Pampa, sponsor of the bill in the House.

"This is a great day for Texas families," said Norm Mason, chairman of the Texas Christian Coalition. "Texas will not have to recognize another state's false interpretation of the sacred institution of marriage."

Social conservatives have tried for several years to enact this type of ban, but the Democratic leadership in the House had prevented it from coming to the floor for a vote. This year the Republican House majority gave the measure priority status.

"From the onset, DOMA has been on a fast track, thanks to the maneuvering of ultraconservative legislators," said Randall Ellis, executive director of the Lesbian Gay Rights Lobby of Texas.

Ellis noted that the bill was tentatively passed about midnight Tuesday, the same day the House tentatively approved a bill adding a 24-hour waiting period for women seeking abortions.

"It is typical of this session that the House would spend a day attacking the rights of women, then end with a slap in the face to the (gay and lesbian) community," Ellis said. "The priorities of our state's leadership are painfully obvious."

Vermont is the only state to recognize civil unions of same-sex couples. Texas would be the 37th state to refuse to recognize such unions since Congress in 1996 gave states authority to refuse to "give full faith and credit" to homosexual unions.

Rep. Toby Goodman, R-Arlington, initially added an amendment that would have allowed Texas to recognize child support and custody orders from other states involving same-sex couples. But he withdrew the amendment at Chisum's request before final passage.

Goodman said states are required to recognize court orders from other states and that the amendment would have protected the Defense of Marriage Act from a constitutional challenge. But he said the issue was "too political."

The bill would allow gays and lesbians to arrange rights relating to hospital visitation, property and life insurance by designating guardians, appointing agents and using private contracts.

Nearly 800 people registered support of the bill, compared to about 220 who signed witness affirmations opposing it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: gay; gayelite; gaytyranny; homosexualagenda; samesexmarriage; stoppinghomoagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
It's great to see the New Butt Order (NBO) get slowed down just a bit.
1 posted on 05/01/2003 6:59:24 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
This stands in stark contrast to what happened in California yesterday where they are trying to mandate letting the cross-dressers, etc work wherever they want regardless of employer wishes.
2 posted on 05/01/2003 7:02:20 AM PDT by ladtx ("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Great job, Texans!!!
3 posted on 05/01/2003 7:03:38 AM PDT by maeng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
"This is a great day for Texas families," said Norm Mason

Yes, I can't tell you how many divorces this will stop; how many kids will now have both Mom and Dad staying together. Wait a minute .... divorces will still happen. So, how does this impact Texas families at all? My relationship with my wife is still the same, without regard to this law, it is more influenced by where we go out to eat; than by anything the beaurocrats do.

4 posted on 05/01/2003 7:04:24 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
The libertarians and Log Cabin Republicans are sure to weigh in on this one. Why don't they join the Greens or the RATs and give up trying to convert us to their deviant way of thinking?
5 posted on 05/01/2003 7:04:44 AM PDT by O.C. - Old Cracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
proud to be Texan today....
6 posted on 05/01/2003 7:05:06 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore
I'm sure their were plenty of ham slammers crying in their latte last night.
7 posted on 05/01/2003 7:08:39 AM PDT by Lance Romance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Hey, is that some sort of insult to latte drinkers?
8 posted on 05/01/2003 7:22:56 AM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Nebraska's Defense of Marriage Law, one of the toughest in the nation, is under challenge from (who else) the local ACLU and the Lambda Legal Defense Fund. The act was approved overwhelmingly a couple of years ago by plebiscite.
9 posted on 05/01/2003 7:29:55 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Vermont is the only state to recognize civil unions of same-sex couples

I'm not so sure this is accurate...

California, so I have read, gives spousal benefits to "partners" in homosexual marraiges/relationships. Then again, I guess they could do this without actually officially recognizing the "union"....???

Also, didn't the issue of recognition of homsexual "marraige" come up in Hawaii - I thought it passed??? Am I wrong?

10 posted on 05/01/2003 7:36:05 AM PDT by TheBattman (Kid Control, not Gun Control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob; scripter
Bump & Ping
11 posted on 05/01/2003 7:48:48 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maeng
You're welcome...


12 posted on 05/01/2003 7:48:50 AM PDT by Texans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore
Me too!!!!
13 posted on 05/01/2003 7:56:29 AM PDT by maeng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
"The priorities of our state's leadership are painfully obvious."

And it's good to see for once. Maybe I should move to Texas. Guess that means the steers and queers will be in NM?

14 posted on 05/01/2003 8:15:45 AM PDT by Truelove (Congito Eggo Sum: I think, therefore I am a waffle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
"So, how does this impact Texas families at all? My relationship with my wife is still the same, without regard to this law..."

The "impact" depends on whether the "Texas family" resembles Larry Flynt's, or Rosie O'Donnels's, OR merely that of one of those typical backwards Southern Baptists (through a vote of 118-9) who voted to nix this "enlightened" measure.

BTW, I hear Amsterdam is lovely at this time of year -- I take it even you wouldn't give your kids the Red Light District tour.

15 posted on 05/01/2003 8:17:04 AM PDT by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Why don't they join the Greens or the RATs

The libertarians already are, they just don't know it. ;^)

16 posted on 05/01/2003 8:18:23 AM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
It never ceases to amaze that some people can turn any thread into an off topic screed against freedom lovers.

Freedom must be terribly frightening to many.

17 posted on 05/01/2003 8:35:25 AM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
the sacred institution of marriage

I don't know where this guy has been but institution of marriage has been routed, drawn and quartered. The divorce rate in this county is 50%. I don't know of any other occurrence that people get into with a more blasé attitude. This so called institution is a joke.
18 posted on 05/01/2003 8:47:18 AM PDT by grapeape (Hope is not a method. - Gen. Hugh Sheldon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras; O.C. - Old Cracker
Freedom to do what? That's a loaded question.

I love freedom, but recognize it has its limits. There are those who don't.

BTW, same-sex unions (eventually marriages) is the topic which many "lovers of freedom (without limits)" support. How does that make some statements "off topic screed"?
19 posted on 05/01/2003 8:49:15 AM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson