I hope I didn't overstep any protocol. I'm sure most know this, but I received interest in this little trick.
If it looks too confusing, just look at "THE TRICK" part of my stuff!
1 posted on
04/30/2003 6:15:29 PM PDT by
bannie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: BJungNan
A playful "bump"
2 posted on
04/30/2003 6:17:30 PM PDT by
bannie
(Carrying the burdon of being a poor speller--mixed with the curse of verbosity)
To: bannie
cool
3 posted on
04/30/2003 6:23:12 PM PDT by
fnord
( Hyprocisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue)
To: bannie
I'll be more concerned about who and whom once we get rid of the much worse confusion of 'him and me' vs 'he and I.' Even the people doing public speaking screw that one up regularly.
4 posted on
04/30/2003 6:24:44 PM PDT by
gcruse
To: bannie
All of my English teachers, all those hours in class.....
and you straighten it all out for me in 20 seconds.
You ARE a great American!!!
5 posted on
04/30/2003 6:25:13 PM PDT by
WhiteGuy
(MY VOTE IS FOR SALE)
To: bannie
Much thanks.
Has long been a bugaboo for me.
I never pretended to know grammar labels etc. well.
6 posted on
04/30/2003 6:26:51 PM PDT by
Quix
To: bannie
Its great to see this information on it's own thread. :-)
7 posted on
04/30/2003 6:27:27 PM PDT by
willieroe
To: bannie
Ah yes, and don't forget:
I after E except before C, and E before N in 'chicken'.
Hens "lay" and people "lie".
8 posted on
04/30/2003 6:27:31 PM PDT by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
To: bannie
Your trick seems to work better for statements than questions.
He do you trust?
Him do you trust?
Which is correct?
To: bannie
I don't understand the question.
15 posted on
04/30/2003 6:39:58 PM PDT by
Focault's Pendulum
(I'm changing my tag line....somebody hand that wrench....no...the other one.)
To: bannie
Actually, will and shall have always tripped me up...:-)
16 posted on
04/30/2003 6:40:26 PM PDT by
Tulsa Brian
(What are you looking at?)
To: bannie
Now do you have any tricks for affect/effect???? I'll often change whole sentences to avoid those words since I'm never really sure.
To: bannie
While we're on this kind of thing, does anyone know the code to remember the planets?
To: bannie
Which was the oldest goat in the pool?
A goat is not a whom or a him, sorry.
To: bannie
thanks!
29 posted on
04/30/2003 6:50:55 PM PDT by
tje
(There is nothing more serious than pleasure.)
To: bannie
The rule is simple: it's the Who, not the Whom whom once wrote "Well, who are you? (Who are you? Who, who, who, who?)"
32 posted on
04/30/2003 6:54:48 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
To: bannie; dighton; general_re; aculeus
The Germanic word for the dative case, der Wemfall, reflects the der-to-dem change. The question word in the dative is, naturally enough, wem ([to] whom): Wem hast du das Buch gegeben?, Whom did you give book? (Who'd you give the book to?)
http://german.about.com/library/blcase_dat.htm
To: bannie
To whom do we give credit for this?
34 posted on
04/30/2003 6:55:56 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(my dogs ran from the room when they heard Hillary shrieking on the radio)
To: rintense
Who do they remind you of?That's a tricky one, but you nailed it! "Who" is doing the "reminding", not "you".
To: bannie
A whole generation has abandoned "who" and "whom" and simply refer to people as "that." My guess is they went through public schools, taught by semi-literate teachers who, er, that, er, whom, er, which did not have a clue about it him- or herselves.
I don't suppose there's much to be done about it except use words correctly ourselves.
37 posted on
04/30/2003 6:58:58 PM PDT by
T'wit
To: bannie
Maybe you can answer my question. Who is this "noone" guy I keep hearing about. example: I went to the door but noone was there. ;9}
38 posted on
04/30/2003 6:59:19 PM PDT by
Ditter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson