Skip to comments.
U.S. Army Private Criticizes Commander-in-Chief
Oxford Town (Oxford Eagle)
| April 30, 2003
| Self
Posted on 04/30/2003 10:58:07 AM PDT by Spook86
A U.S. Army Private from Mississippi has publicly criticized President Bush for his handling of military action in Afghanistan and Iraq, a move that could land her in hot water with her superiors.
Private Sarah Freeland, 22, a native of Oxford, said she "loathes" the President's decision to go to war against Saddam Hussein. In an interview pushlished in her hometown newspaper, the Oxford Eagle, Freeland rebuked the President for failing to gain UN approval for the war.
"The United Nations should have handled this," Freeland told the paper. "It's not our business taking it into our how hands." According to free-lance reporter Camille Comer, who wrote the article for the Eagle's entertainment section, Freeland identifies herself as "a liberal Democrat who hates Bush and his politics."
Freeland is an Army communications specialist, currently assigned to Fort Drum, NY. Her duties include operating and maintaining mobile communications systems. Private Freeland was interviewed while on leave from her military post.
Freeland's critical comments are considered highly unusual, given her junior rank and the military's prohibition on criticizing superior officers, including the Commander-in-Chief. During the Clinton Administration, at least two high-ranking officers were fired for making less-than-flattering remarks about the President. In both cases, those comments were made in private gatherings, not a press interview.
It remains unclear whether Freeland will be punished for her criticism of President Bush. A spokesman for the Fort Drum public affairs office said she had not seen the article, which was published last Thursday.
A check of the newspaper's web site revealed that the weekly entertainment section, "Oxford Town," is not available on-line. However, the print version of the article filled an entire page, with a photograph of a soldier identifed as Freeland in the center.
Freeland told the interviewer that she joined the Army in 2001 because "I thought four years of maturity and discipline would be a good thing." She entered the military after dropping out of the University of Mississippi because "I was too into partying. I couldn't hold down a job or make myself go to class."
Private Freeland, who is engaged to another Fort Drum soldier, said she is worried about Mr. Bush angering so many countries and failing to deliver on promises of assistance.
"In Afghanistan, we promised to set up something better, but these people are starving with no medical care. We promised the same thing to Iraq, but we haven't delivered in Afghanistan yet."
Despite her disagreement with Bush Administration policies, Freeland admitted that her political beliefs are irrelevant to her role as a soldier.
"No matter what moronic things Bush does or how much I don't agree, he's my commander-in-chief, and I'll go," she said.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: army; commanderinchief; fool; getusout; iraqifreedom; military; presidentbush; private; sarahfreeland; ucmj; un; unitednations; usa; usarmy; warwithiraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
To: Squantos; Spook86
"her conduct was not against military regulations unless she did such in uniform.........."on duty"."
Since she was interviewed as a Private in the US Army, she is giving her opinion as such. I don't have my copy of the UCMJ handy, but this probably will come under the article for insubordination, and there is also a general article for "unsoldierly conduct."
Sadly, military justice and discipline has gone to hell over the past 20 years. She will probably receive only unit punishment from her CO ("Article 32" I think the Army calls it). If I were her CO, I would get real "creative" as there is a lot of "bad deals" that can befall a young trooper without calling it "punishment." Better yet, turn her over to the unit senior NCOs to see that she gets a "numba one good deal." You have to commit murder to get anything other than an honorable discharge, as higher ups are scared to hang the bad paper on anyone.
81
posted on
04/30/2003 2:36:00 PM PDT
by
NFOShekky
(Hang Em High!)
To: Paradox
In Afghanistan, we promised to set up something better, but these people are starving with no medical care. We promised the same thing to Iraq, but we haven't delivered in Afghanistan yet." I think a front line assignment to Afganistan is in order here. Let this soldier garner some first hand experience of which she spews.
To: Spook86
Okay, fine...now we have a 21-year old PFC and a female to boot criticizing the Commander in Chief.
This sounds like a little girlie looking for a way to get out of the mean ol' Army and back home to the Bayou...and maybe get some sympathy and bucks along the way.
83
posted on
04/30/2003 2:41:28 PM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: NFOShekky
That is true. Absent of a violent felony or major embezzelment, it is almost impossible to get a dishonorable discharge.
Yes, it's true that a lot of Clinton bashing went on in the service during his reign. That bashing was almost without exception behind closed doors, and mostly, it seemed, by officers and senior NCOs. This isn't to say that the lower enlisted may not have felt the same, but it wasn't appropriate for them to acknowledge it. Even the memos that went out was from senior leaders to senior leaders re: Do not trade Clinton-bashing emails while at work.
Never in the darkest days of the 90s would anyone have thought that they could have gone to their hometown newspaper, torched Clinton directly, and walked away without calling down the thunder.
84
posted on
04/30/2003 2:51:09 PM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Like water in a bucket.... calm but deadly...)
To: Spook86
Should be terminated for violating military rules. When liberals whine that free speech is being violated, we should once again lecture them (as if they were children) about the nature of free speech and how organizations can expect that certain standards are met as an obligation of your employment.
To: Spook86
She's enlisted. She can say what she wants as long as she follows orders.
To: borisbob69
... She entered the military after dropping out of the University of Mississippi because "I was too into partying. I couldn't hold down a job or make myself go to class."Well, she not have become much of a soldier-ette, but she sure has the makings of an excellent Democrat. She has neither her life, nor many facts, under control.
To: Blood of Tyrants
"Well, they can't bust her to a lower rank."
Well yes they can, I believe they are called... convicts.
What they need to do to this moron is
6, 6, and a Big Chicken Dinner
6 months brig, 6 months badtime & a Bad Conduct Discharge
IMO then have a nice time getting a job,for this SFB bimbo
88
posted on
04/30/2003 3:43:22 PM PDT
by
SERE_DOC
(Murphy's rules for combat #14 The equipment you are using was made by the lowest bidder!)
To: cookcounty; Spook86
"She's enlisted. She can say what she wants as long as she follows orders."
NEGATIVE! See my post #81 and besides, almost any contact a servicemember has with the press must be cleared with the local Public Affairs Office for just this reason. The military doesn't need PFCs speaking "for the military."
89
posted on
04/30/2003 3:43:41 PM PDT
by
NFOShekky
(Old Geezer Wannabee)
To: CheneyChick
"But I do thank x42 for two things: because of him, (1) I joined FR and (2) I joined the NRA."
LOL! Because of him, I found Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, the NRA, the addresses of all my congressmen, Free Republic, and the RNC. Gosh. I had no idea how far over the edge he had driven me...
90
posted on
04/30/2003 3:46:41 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(War's over... let's get Estrada confirmed!)
To: Spook86
"I thought four years of maturity and discipline would be a good thing." I wonder if fighting a war ever crossed her mind as a reason, or certainly a consequence, of joining my Army!
retired Army officer bump
To: Arius
You are wrong! If this is true she will get spanked and sent to packin'. Shes gonna get a trip home but it will be more costly than most folks think. The Gunny
92
posted on
04/30/2003 4:54:00 PM PDT
by
TheGunny
To: NFOShekky
Her comments are chargeable as sedition. This charge makes no difference if she was on duty or off of duty what ever that means.
93
posted on
04/30/2003 4:58:37 PM PDT
by
flyer182
To: Arius
"she will get a pass"
yeah, a bus pass on the next greydawg back to oxford!
To: Spook86
Hey dipsh*t! They called her "ARMY PRIVATE" I expect that you would have missed this, being that most folks in the AF refer to each other by thier first names and not rank. Or if thats not the case EVERY one is a Sergeant! The Gunny
95
posted on
04/30/2003 5:04:36 PM PDT
by
TheGunny
To: TheGunny
Hey dipsh*t! They called her "ARMY PRIVATE" I expect that you would have missed this...Hey dipsh*t! Spook86 is the author of the original post and the person who actually read the referenced article. I guess you missed that.
96
posted on
04/30/2003 5:37:47 PM PDT
by
Sandy
To: Spook86; All
You guys who want to hang her are completely out of line. Bush is not so fragile that he would find the words of a E-1 a threat to his manhood like Clinton would.
If she is prosecuted then three-quarters of the military would have had to have been prosecuted during the Clinton years.
As an enlisted, she is granted far more leeway in voicing "contemptuous words" than an officer. An officer is expected to know better. No enlisted has ever been punished for violating the "contemptuous words" directive -- whereas senior officers have.
Give her a few years and she will come around. If she stays in the military, in about 10 years she will be a neocon FReeper wondering how she could have thought such stuff when she was younger.
97
posted on
04/30/2003 6:07:46 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Spook86
"She might also be a specialist," NOPE. An Army Private is from E-1 thru E3, then you are either E-4 or Spec 4 depending on your MOS.
98
posted on
04/30/2003 6:13:01 PM PDT
by
Chong
(God Bless and Protect our Troops! God Bless our Commander-In-Chief!)
To: flyer182
Her comments are chargeable as sedition. Sedition?! She's a private for Pete's sake. Like she's going to lead a movement to overthrow the government or something? You need to switch to decaf.
99
posted on
04/30/2003 6:13:10 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
point out where it charges by rank. hey, some of the worlds best dictators were cpls. she wears the uniform, she answers like everyone.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson