[Hodar]

Darwinism is the atheist religion

No, I have no idea where you came up with that thought. Go to any museaum and you can actually LEARN what you are talking about. Darwinism need not cause you to reject creationism any more than chemisty does. You can easily see that the fossil record shows that animals change over time. This is what Charles Darwin noted. Survival of the fittest, and animals changing characteristics that aided in survival are hardly a religon. The bible makes no references to dinosaurs, so are they a religous fanatics fantasy too?

[f.Christian]

SOUPERSTITION ... baloney science (( atheist // evolution )) ---

A smart God // science doesn't -- can't evolve ...

evolution (( Godless )) is inherently stupid --- impossible !

[Physicist]

No, I have no idea where you came up with that thought.

Sure you do. There's a whole cottage industry of people peddling that line of snake oil.

[Dataman]

Go to any museaum and you can actually LEARN what you are talking about.

OK. Where is my nearest museaum?

[MEGoody]

"You can easily see that the fossil record shows that animals change over time."

The only thing bones and fossils prove is that something lived, then died. The rest is assumptions about those bones and fossils.

[riggedtosail]

Actually, take a quick peek at Job 40 in the bible. The description of the animal described by Job could possibly be a dinosaur. Given the description of the tail, it definitely excludes an elephant. He refered to the beast as a Behemoth

[Segale2001]

Hodar: Good question. The Bible does not mention Dinosars by name. However we know they exsisted. The Bible does not mention the word Pope, yet Millions of people worship the ground this man walks on. Why do we look for validity or proof in the Bible for Dinosars, while Millions beleive in the Pope as the highest religious Catholic on Earth? The Pope is real and so are the T-Rex bones... yet neither are in the Bible?