Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar
SOUPERSTITION ... baloney science (( atheist // evolution )) ---

A smart God // science doesn't -- can't evolve ...

evolution (( Godless )) is inherently stupid --- impossible !
10 posted on 04/29/2003 12:00:28 PM PDT by f.Christian (( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: f.Christian
And dinosaur bones, fossils, petrified shells and all other evidence showing evolution are really just mass hysteria, huh? Amazing that so many museaums around the world would buy into the impossible. The frozen mammonth in Siberia is really just a hairy sardine. A little education on your part would do wonders. You can actually learn from a visit to any neighborhood museaum. And evolution is not necessarily an Atheistic pursuit, you would know this if you bothered to investigate for yourself.
11 posted on 04/29/2003 12:05:47 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: f.Christian
To f.Christian,

I have read many of your replies, and for the life of me I cannot understand why you post things with such an arcane pattern of wording and punctuation. The whole point of posting is to COMMUNICATE with the reader. Your arguments are not well represented with the bizzare syntax you choose to implement.

For example, you stated:

"...evolution (( Godless )) is inherently stupid --- impossible !..."

Do you mean that believing in NO God is on it's face stupid, and that believing in God is automatically a sign of intelligence? Then I would have to ask, would belief in TWO Gods be even smarter? How about THREE?

A reader is left by your posts with the impression that either:

(a) English is not your first language -or-
(b) English is your first language, you just never bothered to learn the rules -or-
(c) You know the rules, but are too lazy to adhere to them while writing -or-
(d) You are masking poor or weak arguments in hard to read sentences.

COMMUNICATION ... (((talking // speaking // writing))) requires (needs // depends upon) MUTUALLY ACCEPTED Language Usage.

There, is that better?

Rebel Ace

19 posted on 04/29/2003 12:17:04 PM PDT by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson