To: f.Christian
To f.Christian,
I have read many of your replies, and for the life of me I cannot understand why you post things with such an arcane pattern of wording and punctuation. The whole point of posting is to
COMMUNICATE with the reader. Your arguments are not well represented with the bizzare syntax you choose to implement.
For example, you stated:
"...evolution (( Godless )) is inherently stupid --- impossible !..."
Do you mean that believing in NO God is on it's face stupid, and that believing in God is automatically a sign of intelligence? Then I would have to ask, would belief in TWO Gods be even smarter? How about THREE?
A reader is left by your posts with the impression that either:
(a) English is not your first language -or-
(b) English is your first language, you just never bothered to learn the rules -or-
(c) You know the rules, but are too lazy to adhere to them while writing -or-
(d) You are masking poor or weak arguments in hard to read sentences.
COMMUNICATION ... (((talking // speaking // writing))) requires (needs // depends upon) MUTUALLY ACCEPTED Language Usage.
There, is that better?
Rebel Ace
19 posted on
04/29/2003 12:17:04 PM PDT by
Rebel_Ace
(Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
To: Rebel_Ace
ra ...
Do you mean that believing in NO God is on it's face stupid, and that believing in God is automatically a sign of intelligence? Then I would have to ask, would belief in TWO Gods be even smarter? How about THREE?
fC ...
good example of evo babble ---
evo logic epilepsy --- stutter // stupor // fits ! !
27 posted on
04/29/2003 12:26:22 PM PDT by
f.Christian
(( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
To: Rebel_Ace
The whole point of posting is to COMMUNICATE with the reader. You may have found a counter-example.
36 posted on
04/29/2003 12:37:04 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Rebel_Ace
fc ...
What do you call this ...
ra ...
a sign of intelligence? Then I would have to ask, would belief in TWO Gods be even smarter? How about THREE?
fc ... zoo science --- religion // kennel !
40 posted on
04/29/2003 12:44:17 PM PDT by
f.Christian
(( There (( evolution )) ... but for the grace (( love // Truth )) of God --- go (( WAS )) I . ))
To: Rebel_Ace
I just skip those posts.
Unreadable (!language/!syntax)=== no communication (!understand/!intelligence) ---> waste of time (better things to do)!
374 posted on
05/02/2003 2:12:57 AM PDT by
KCmark
(The bar for 'traitor' is a little low right now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson