Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aziz admits Saddam may be dead
Scotland on Sunday ^ | April 27, 2003 | TOM CURTIS

Posted on 04/26/2003 6:10:13 PM PDT by MadIvan

FORMER Iraqi prime minister Tariq Aziz has told American intelligence officials that he has not seen Saddam Hussein since the first night of the war, it was claimed last night.

Aziz, who surrendered to US forces last week, has fuelled speculation that the Iraqi dictator was killed or seriously injured when the bunker in which he was hiding with his sons has hit by cruise missiles.

According to US intelligence sources, the 67-year-old has said he does not know whether Saddam is alive or dead.

However, he has told his captors he presumes the former Iraqi leader was incapacitated as he played no role in coordinating the defence of Baghdad.

The director of the CIA, George Tenet, has reportedly been saying he believes Saddam is dead after being briefed on Aziz’s testimony.

Meanwhile, it was also reported last night that secret Iraqi intelligence documents uncovered in Baghdad show a direct link between Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terrorist network and Saddam’s regime.

The documents, discovered by a Sunday Telegraph journalist in the headquarters of the Mukhabarat, the Iraqi intelligence service, are said to reveal that an al-Qaeda envoy was invited to a clandestine meeting in Baghdad in March 1998.

According to the newspaper, the documents show the purpose of the meeting was to establish a relationship between Baghdad and al-Qaeda based on their mutual hatred of the United States and Saudi Arabia.

The meeting, which is said to have lasted for more than a week, is supposed to have ended with arrangements being made for a visit to Iraq by bin Laden.

Yesterday, at least a dozen people were feared dead after an ammunition dump near Baghdad exploded, showering homes up to two miles away with warheads, rockets and mortars.

The blasts at the open air store are believed to have injured at least 10 other people. Last night the US army said the explosions had been triggered by "hostile forces", which it accused of firing flares into the depot.

Six of the dead were understood to be from a single family whose street, a mile from the dump, was hit by a missile, although it was unclear if they were the only fatalities. The missile ploughed into the lane between two rows of homes, demolishing four of them.

Inside one of the houses, the impact killed a 50-year-old worker, his four teenage children and his 23-year-old daughter-in-law, a new mother.

Mohammed Khazaal, 15, the brother of the dead young woman, had been sleeping when the missile hit his home.

"Our house collapsed. That’s all I remember," he said from a hospital bed. Nearby, medical workers treated deep cuts in the legs of Zeineb Thamer, the one-year-old daughter of the woman who died.

Hundreds of enraged, screaming Iraqis blamed US-led occupying forces for the incident, criticising them for storing ammunition near homes.

Bloodstained resident Munthir Safir said: "Is this the safety that Bush promised us?" Around him, wailing women collapsed over the coffins of the dead. One man, waving his fist, shouted: "No Saddam! No Bush! Yes to Islam!"

As well as protests in the Zaafaraniyah suburb, which bore the brunt of the explosions, there were also demonstrations in the city centre.

Hours later, smoke was still pouring from a blackened crater left at the missile cache, as explosives boomed, a rocket whistled and rounds popped.

In Doha, Qatar, US Central Command spokesman Lieutenant Mark Kitchens blamed "the despicable people" who fired the flares. "This is not just an attempt to disrupt the process of peace. It’s a crime against the Iraqi people," he said.

The dump was sabotaged just before 8am local time as people living nearby slept or prepared breakfast. Sergeant Ronald King, a witness, said someone who was out of sight of US troops at the depot fired four flares over a wall around an open field that the forces had been using to store the ordnance.

Americans said some tactical weapons had been stored there by Saddam’s regime, which has previously been found to have hidden such items in schools and homes.

But the US military had also put some of the ordnance there itself, collecting abandoned Iraqi caches from around the city for later disposal, King said. Colonel John Peabody, commanding officer of the US Army’s 11th Engineering Brigade, which had been helping to handle the site, said the cache included Russian-made Frog-7 missiles and Iraq’s own Al Samoud II - 80 missiles in all.

The flares hit an ammunition pit, setting fire to wooden ammunition crates, King said.

Initial reports indicated up to 40 people had died, and the main hospital in southern Baghdad said there were 12 fatalities. The US said six people appeared to have died and 10 or more Iraqis sustained injuries. Residents said two would undoubtedly die.

Peabody said US forces initially came under small-arms fire when they went to the scene, and returned fire.

He would not speculate on exactly who fired the flares. "Somebody who does not want us to be here," he said, adding: "We are very sorry that the practice of Saddam Hussein putting his missiles throughout Baghdad has resulted in this."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aziz; blair; bush; cache; casualties; decapitation; explosives; flares; iraq; iraqifreedom; missiles; sabotage; saddam; smallarmsfire; uk; us; victory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: Fred Mertz
.....I concluded that all bets were off......

Me too.American Military intelligence had a good reason for both hits and one day those reasons will be divulged. It would help us a lot if the names of those suspected of being there were released.

There is a deck of 55 cards, of which 13 are now in custody. There were reportedly 14 in the latter strike and an unknown number in the first. It is a pretty safe bet to say that half of the 55 are off the street.

61 posted on 04/27/2003 5:45:41 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan; Travis McGee
"Shock and Awe" was real and it worked.
It WAS NOT designed to shock and awe me or you.
It WAS NOT designed to shock and awe the media.
It WAS designed to shock and awe the Iraqi regime.
It did that, and it was very effective.
The opposition had vitually zero military leadership, communication,
or coordination after the first few seconds of the war.
Oh, and by the way, Saddam is dead.
62 posted on 04/27/2003 6:07:48 AM PDT by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: The Boston Stranger
If Aziz was a "mole", why would the coalition start the rumor that he had been captured, killed, etc., at the beginning of the war? Later reports said that those rumors were started to make him show himself so he could be tracked, perhaps to help locate Saddam.

I agree that Aziz seems the type to sell out his boss. I'm just not sure his involvement in the early days of the war make sense if he had.
63 posted on 04/27/2003 6:53:14 AM PDT by TN4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I have a question. Have I missed it or has there not been any reports of finding and entering the main bunker that the Swiss built for Saddam?

If I missed it, could someone point me to that thread?
64 posted on 04/27/2003 7:16:34 AM PDT by Texas Tea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm not sure Aziz is in any position to be caught in a lie, do you?

I think if Aziz knowing provides false information, he may be turned over to the Iraqis for their brand of justice. That plus the confisction of any money his family might have to live on. The only thing he has to sell is truth.

65 posted on 04/27/2003 7:23:57 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Allan
It was clear to me that Bush believes Saddam was hit the first night.

I watched Tom Brokaw's interview. It *is* clear that President Bush believes he got Saddam the first night. It is also clear that he trusts the intelligence on the ground in Iraq that provided the information on Saddam's whereabouts.

Bush does not parse his words like a lawyer.

He doesn't. He's uncomplicated and straightforward. It's a waste of time to try and analyze what he says.

66 posted on 04/27/2003 9:09:04 AM PDT by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I looked up your bio sheet and realize I should done that earlier. There was a "Mad Ivan" that was in denial about the 9 million or so Germans that were were either killed outright or by being ethnicaly cleansed from Pomerania (now western Poland), Prussia, Sudetenland, etc.

I think that he may have used a space or used lower case in his post name.

67 posted on 04/27/2003 9:46:49 AM PDT by rightofrush (Not only Rush, but Buchanan as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rightofrush
Well I don't know about any other Mad Ivans - I thought I was the only one. Disquieting that I'm not. ;)

Regards, Ivan

68 posted on 04/27/2003 10:03:59 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: The Boston Stranger
Did I see something today about aziz maybe having worked as a 'mole'? I could believe that of him.

Considering that president Bush has made a similar statement recently about Saddam getting killed the first night, I would think that strengthens the case that Aziz was the informant. And Aziz being alive, thus not likely at that bombed meeting, is another factor.

69 posted on 04/27/2003 10:12:48 AM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Publicus
he never said he never SPOKE or otherwise communicated with Saddam- directly or indirectly. He only said he had not SEEN him

Exactly what my dh said. Aziz's statement was carefully worded.

Personally, I'd rather be optimistic. It won't change the circumstances of Saddam's whereabouts, but it makes me feel a lot better to think he's dead.

70 posted on 04/27/2003 11:44:20 AM PDT by Otta B Sleepin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Allan
I'm not sure exactly what I heard. I suspect you heard a different interview.
71 posted on 04/27/2003 9:52:48 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit; BenLurkin; MadIvan
"Belarus official does not deny DEBKAfile’s revelation of Saddam Hussein’s flight to Minsk. In answer to question, Belarus President’s spokesperson Natalia Pietkiewicz said only: “We have no information of Saddam Hussein’s presence in Belarus.”"

-From today's DEBKAfile.

72 posted on 04/28/2003 8:58:24 PM PDT by rightofrush (Not only Rush, but Buchanan as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

73 posted on 04/28/2003 8:59:26 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightofrush
If "one has no information" about something then it is hard to deny it.

If he were in Belarus we would have him within days, if not hours. Did he come in with Chinese troops?
74 posted on 04/29/2003 6:45:40 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson