Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dixie Chicks launch full-frontal attack - "not...standing their ground...pushing it even farther"
The Dallas Morning News ^ | April 25, 2003 | By TOM MAURSTAD / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 04/26/2003 11:35:34 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

Dixie Chicks launch full-frontal attack


04/25/2003

By TOM MAURSTAD / The Dallas Morning News

You're a platinum-selling country star riding a record-setting wave of popularity. But a few weeks ago, you made a comment during a concert that has angered and alienated your core constituency.

What do you do?

If you're the Dixie Chicks, you pose naked on the cover of Entertainment Weekly.

This latest move is likely to turn up the flames on a controversy that has been burning for more than a month. That's a feeling echoed by program directors at the area's two leading country-music stations, neither of which has played a Dixie Chicks' song since early March when singer Natalie Maines told a London audience she was ashamed that President Bush is from Texas.

Under the headline "Dixie Chicks Come Clean," the May 2 issue shows the country-music trio posed in a pyramid of bare skin. Across their torsos are painted phrases – "Traitors," "Saddam's Angels," "Shut Up!" – drawn from the volumes of letters and e-mails the band has received.

Also Online
Video: Local radio station weighs in on whether to continue Chicks ban
In the tradition of mainstream magazines featuring nude celebrities on their covers (Janet Jackson on Rolling Stone, Demi Moore on Vanity Fair), the Dixie Chicks are positioned in such a way – a hand here, a leg there – that no private parts are exposed. Such attention to the technicalities of nudity does nothing to diminish the provocative nature of the image.

(And in answer to the first question this photograph will spark, an Entertainment Weekly spokeswoman asserts: "That's them, their bodies. There were no computer tricks, no airbrushing.")

With the women's unflinching stares into the camera and the blurb's promise of "Country's Controversial Superstars Take on Their Critics," the cover is striking, even defiant.

"We wanted to show the absurdity of the extreme names people have been calling us," fiddle player Martie Maguire says in the story.

The Dixie Chicks ... stirring up more controversy with their upcoming <I> Entertainment Weekly </I> cover photo.
AP
The Dixie Chicks ... stirring up more controversy with their upcoming Entertainment Weekly cover photo.

The attention-getting cover story comes on the heels of the group's interview this week with Diane Sawyer on ABC's Primetime Thursday . Publicity campaigns undertaken by celebrities who have fallen from their public's graces are nothing new. But traditionally the celebrity is practicing some form of damage control – a high-profile mea culpa or by going silent on the subject.

But not the Dixie Chicks. Far from throwing water on the fire, they seem to be throwing gasoline.

"What this reflects is that the old damage control just doesn't work anymore because everybody knows the playbook," says Robert Thompson, a professor of pop culture and television at Syracuse University. "Everybody is so media savvy now that if you apologize, people just dismiss it as what your consultant told you to say."

A band representative on Thursday said the singers had no comment on the cover photograph or the interview. But others in country music certainly have.

"I don't know that they'll ever be as big with the country audience as they used to or as important to the country audience as they used to be," says Paul Williams, program director of KPLX-FM (99.5) "The Wolf."

"At first I thought it was a joke," says Ted Stecker, program director for KSCS-FM (96.3), of the Entertainment Weekly cover. "I don't think it's a good move for them right now.

Unlike other outspoken celebrities, such as rocker Sheryl Crow or activist director Michael Moore, whose anti-war comments have generally been applauded by their fans, the Dixie Chicks' comments play against country music's bedrock fans.

"You could write off the comment that started all this as something said in the excitement of the moment," says Leo Braudy, author of The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and its History. "But what's going on now is the result of calculation.

"It's a pretty striking strategy. Rather than backing down and appearing on the cover waving a flag or dressed in military uniforms, they are not just standing their ground, they're pushing it even farther."

Staff critic Mario Tarradell contributed to this report.

E-mail tmaurstad@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/latestnews/stories/042503dnovechicks.18b99.html


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: MeeknMing
They're probably not finished; at least in the near term. No doubt they've converted others not usually prone to like Bluegrass or C&W, but those fans aren't likely to stick around once the dust has been substantially settled.

Their loss will be the large number of true Bluegrass and C&W fans who are now just repulsed by them. They won't need to talk themsleves into not buying the Chicks CDs, it will be a reflexive thing. What remains to be seen is what the financial ramifications will be, in terms of future sales and advertisers putting their names behind the Chicks.

I hope they get booed off stage just as SINEAID did. They really have that coming.

21 posted on 04/26/2003 11:51:30 AM PDT by AlbionGirl (A kite flies highest against the wind, not with it. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
In answer to the question, "Is that really you, Natalie?" here is Exhibit #1 --


22 posted on 04/26/2003 11:52:27 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The Dixie Chicks made the center square!!!!!



Originally posted by FReeper Martus!!!



23 posted on 04/26/2003 11:52:46 AM PDT by Eaker (64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday. Somehow, it didn't make the news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Is it just me? I can't see how those photos are not airbrushed. Especially Natalie Maines. She is so chubby. One of them just had a baby. Their heads look like they are at a weird angle. I'm not buying the no airbrush thing.
24 posted on 04/26/2003 11:53:24 AM PDT by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
You be quicker than me!!!
25 posted on 04/26/2003 11:53:47 AM PDT by Eaker (64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday. Somehow, it didn't make the news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Exhibit #2 --


26 posted on 04/26/2003 11:54:01 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I think it was a masterful PR move. Their PR agent knows that the Ditzi Chicks are history in the Country Music scene. They are using the negative publicity, generated by their previous Country Music fan-base, to create positive publicity for their new Pop Music fan-base.

PR people will give their first born male child for this kind of publicty. And they have used it to target a new fan-base.
27 posted on 04/26/2003 11:54:10 AM PDT by Search4Truth (When a man lies, he murders part of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Exhibit #3 --


28 posted on 04/26/2003 11:55:02 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gg188

When they shoot themselves in the foot, they empty the clip.

LOL

They are better cartoon characters than singers.

29 posted on 04/26/2003 11:56:28 AM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
RE: Exhibit #3...

There is no better fashion statement than a California King waterbed sheet.

30 posted on 04/26/2003 11:57:47 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I'm getting a light case of CRS as I get older, but I could swear I heard Tony Snow say it *was* airbrushed earlier today. Didn't present it as opinion, but didn't source it either. But it looks too good to be true to YT also.
31 posted on 04/26/2003 11:57:53 AM PDT by Felis_irritable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
They really should try crack cocaine. It's helped so many celebrities with their careers.
32 posted on 04/26/2003 11:58:28 AM PDT by Mark (Treason doeth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

"It's gonna be tough fight; gotta get ready for it and gain me some pounds!"

33 posted on 04/26/2003 12:00:41 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Natalie has lost about 40 pounds in ten days!

And managed to get through pregnancy without a single stretch mark!

34 posted on 04/26/2003 12:01:15 PM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mark
We can see through their artsy-fartsy explanation of that cover. They are trying to appeal to the neo-hippie Sheryl Crow crowd who think that such as that is so deep and so powerful a statement. They are publicity hogs.
35 posted on 04/26/2003 12:02:15 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
And, people say class is dead!
36 posted on 04/26/2003 12:03:07 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
a
37 posted on 04/26/2003 12:03:38 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Search4Truth
PR people will give their first born male child for this kind of publicty. And they have used it to target a new fan-base.

Exactly, and we've all bought into it. Dang.

38 posted on 04/26/2003 12:03:42 PM PDT by Scothia (If you pray for rain, prepare to deal with some mud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I've always believed one reason the Dixie Chick's comment inflamed so many people was their apparent hypocrisy. Sheryl Crow never pretended to be anything but liberal and anti-war from the beginning.

In contrast, the Dixie Chicks were riding a wave of popularity largely based on a military-themed song. When Natalie said what she did on foreign soil, on the eve of war, her attitude seemed a slap in the face to these military families and their commander-in-chief.

Her apologies have been a tangle of self-justifications and have revealed her deep dislike of President Bush and her lack of understanding of the war and the gravity of her actions. Her leftist (self-serving) thinking has once and for all been revealed, leaving many of her fans disillusioned. The three of them may yet emerge victorious by refashioning themselves as a leftist group, but they will probably not regain their previous, largly conservative audience.

39 posted on 04/26/2003 12:03:50 PM PDT by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
It seems to be some sort of feminine logic I guess. Say something stupid, and instead of defending it with logic, get nekkid!
40 posted on 04/26/2003 12:05:23 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson