Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia Lawmakers Scrap Dixie Cross on Flag: NAACP May Still Boycott State
Louisville, KY, Courier-Journal ^ | 04-26-03 | Wyatt, Kristen

Posted on 04/26/2003 7:52:22 AM PDT by Theodore R.

Ga. Lawmakers Scrap Dixie Cross on Flag

By KRISTEN WYATT Associated Press Writer

ATLANTA (AP) -- Georgia lawmakers have voted to scrap the Dixie cross from the state's flag, potentially heading off an economic boycott by civil rights groups outraged by the Confederate emblem.

With some black lawmakers cheering and others weeping, the Legislature voted Friday to replace the current flag with a new design, inspired by a Confederate national flag but lacking the well-known cross of stars.

"This gives the people a flag based on history, but yet looking to the future," said Democratic Sen. George Hooks, a white Democrat who helped design the new flag.

Republican Gov. Sonny Perdue agreed moments later to sign the plan. The new flag will become permanent only if voters choose it over the current flag next March.

Perdue originally called for a referendum on a version of Georgia's flag that featured the Dixie cross but backed off after black lawmakers succeeded in defeating the idea.

Hours before the final votes on the flag in the House and Senate, civil rights groups promised an economic boycott if Georgia revived the Dixie cross, which many blacks lawmakers call a symbol of oppression.

The Senate voted 33-23 and the House approved the measure 91-86, with the speaker casting the deciding vote. Ninety-one votes were the simple majority needed for passage.

The temporary flag features the state's coat of arms and the words "In God We Trust" on a blue corner in the top left, with three red-and-white stripes to the right. It resembles a Confederate national flag and the pre-1956 Georgia state flag, but it doesn't have the familiar battle emblem.

Black lawmakers objected not to the Confederate roots of the temporary flag, but to the possibility of bringing back the Dixie battle cross, which was added to Georgia's flag in 1956 when an all-white Legislature was resisting integration.

"That 'X' has been in the face of people who have been at the end of a rope or in front of a burning cross," said Sen. Ed Harbison, chairman of the Legislative Black Caucus. "We know we have a history, but bringing that 'X' back was totally unacceptable to us."

Southern heritage advocates, who had pushed for the statewide referendum on the Confederate battle emblem flag, called the new flag a betrayal.

"We'll be making our displeasure known in short order," said Rusty Henderson of the Heritage Preservation Association.

Civil rights leaders promised an economic boycott if the bill was not changed to remove any chance that the Confederate emblem might be approved by referendum.

Georgia's flag was changed in 2001 to shrink the Confederate symbol, in part to avoid economic boycotts like the one targeting South Carolina, which flies the rebel banner on state Capitol grounds.

Business leaders in Atlanta have warned that boycotts could cripple tourism, Georgia's No. 2 industry, and which brings in an estimated $16 billion a year to the state.

The civil rights groups said they may still call for a boycott. The temporary flag also has Confederate roots, they said.

"This is a heinous proposal," said NAACP member Michael Bond, son of NAACP chairman Julian Bond. "It's still a Confederate flag. It's completely objectionable."

Any boycott would be announced Saturday at an NAACP meeting in Macon.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bond; confederate; controversy; dixie; flag; ga; georgiaflag; hooks; naacp; perdue
It seems like the Perdue administration and the legislature have "compromised," but the NAACP is still upset with "Confederate roots" on the proposed new flag.

In Mississippi in 2001, voters cast a 2/3 vote to keep the Confederate logo on that state's flag. Had GA held the election that candidate Perdue proposed in 2002, would the outcome have been similar? I guess we shall never know.

1 posted on 04/26/2003 7:52:22 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Seems to me that the NAACP should be complaining to the Democratic Party for holding their Presidential Debate next week in South Carolina, too!
2 posted on 04/26/2003 7:56:16 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The NAACP boycott of GA is just a method to boost black voter turnout in 2004. The NAACP tried the same gimmick in SC last year. THe RATS lost the races for Governor and Senator.
3 posted on 04/26/2003 7:56:17 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
It seems like the Perdue administration and the legislature have "compromised," but the NAACP is still upset with "Confederate roots" on the proposed new flag.

So why did they bother?

It seems like an exercise in futility to appease those who refuse to be appeased.

4 posted on 04/26/2003 7:57:02 AM PDT by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The new Georgia flag is about as harmless looking as you can get, and the racist NAACP is still being uppity about it. Fine, let 'em boycott. When folks see the new flag, and how benign it is, then see the race-baiters making a big deal of it, maybe it'll finally start to sink in that this issue has never been about slavery, oppression, Jim Crow, or hurt feelings, but merely a way for the NAACP to keep itself in the news, and therefore in power. Let's hope, anyway.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

5 posted on 04/26/2003 8:06:50 AM PDT by wku man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Budge
Why do these citizens allow people to blackmail them? Stand up for what you believe in for God's sakes and make a stand.
6 posted on 04/26/2003 8:13:57 AM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Perdue originally called for a referendum on a version of Georgia's flag that featured the Dixie cross but backed off after black lawmakers succeeded in defeating the idea.

It appears to me that Perdue LIED to get elected. That’s a novel approach by a politician. I hope they (those that voted him in) learned a valuable lesson in GA. He’s a scoundrel and should be ignored until they can vote him out.
7 posted on 04/26/2003 8:15:20 AM PDT by schaketo (NAALCP and their ilk $uck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
That 'X' ...bringing that 'X' back was totally unacceptable to us."
I am deeply saddened.
8 posted on 04/26/2003 8:16:51 AM PDT by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schaketo
Perdue will be guaranteed the Republican gubernatorial nomination in 2006 if he wishes to run again. The nomination may or may not be worth the paper it is written on. GA Republicans would be unlikely to topple a sitting governor no matter what -- just as the national GOP renominated weak candidates Taft, Hoover, Ford, and G.H.W. Bush in 1992.
9 posted on 04/26/2003 8:37:47 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wku man
Right on!

If those racist publicity-pimps in the NAACP utter even a peep about the new flag, the people of Georgia should rise up and insist that their original flag be restored. And, IMHO, they should throw out any no-cojone legislator or official who caved in to the NAACP's blackmail in the first place!

------------

Hmmm...Does anyone know what six flages now fly in front of "Six Flags Over Texas"? (One, of course, should be that of the Confederacy.)

Six flags (Spain, France, Mexico, the Republic of Texas, The Confederacy, and the United States) -- in historic fact -- once flew over Texas. Let's see the history-revising NAACP try to delete any one of them!

10 posted on 04/26/2003 9:26:27 AM PDT by TXnMA (On my honor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
That 'X' ...bringing that 'X' back was totally unacceptable to us."

I agree: It brings to mind a real racist-- Malcolm "X".

11 posted on 04/26/2003 9:30:05 AM PDT by TXnMA (On my honor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
It seems like the Perdue administration and the legislature have "compromised," but the NAACP is still upset with "Confederate roots" on the proposed new flag.

Aren't they changing their story here? The original reason they had a problem with the old Georgia flag as that it had the Confederate Battle Flag on it -- which they claimed had been taken over as a symbol of hate by the KKK, neo-Nazis, and others who use it as a racist symbol. Now they have changed their story to claim that if something has "Confederate roots" it is no longer acceptable.

With every move the NAACP edges ever closer to irrelevancy.

12 posted on 04/26/2003 9:38:28 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
With every move the NAACP edges ever closer to irrelevancy.

Irrelevancy, well to paraphrase St. MLK:

"I have a nightmare that some day it will be illegal in the United States to criticize the NAACP for any reason."
13 posted on 04/26/2003 11:47:38 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
One can pretty well figure on some kind of court fight over
"In God We Trust" at some point.

Watch for it.

Sonny, you're a one term Gov for sure now.
14 posted on 04/26/2003 11:54:46 AM PDT by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tet68
It may be that Governor Perdue did not learn the lesson of his neighbor: FORMER Governor Jim Hodges, D-SC, when it comes to waffling on Confederate flag issues. The people who opposed Perdue in 2002 will still oppose him in 2006, and the "Confederate-flag" base will no longer be there for him in 2006. It's a matter of simple subtraction of one's base! Some Republicans can't see: they keep dreaming of securing more "moderate" support!
15 posted on 04/26/2003 12:11:37 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tet68
In this Age of Clinton, "In God We Trust" has been disproved, I am afraid to report. The Bible says one cannot service God and mammon. So, how can one support "In God We Trust" and still be a supporter of the Clintons?
16 posted on 04/26/2003 12:17:38 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson