Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It seems like the Perdue administration and the legislature have "compromised," but the NAACP is still upset with "Confederate roots" on the proposed new flag.

In Mississippi in 2001, voters cast a 2/3 vote to keep the Confederate logo on that state's flag. Had GA held the election that candidate Perdue proposed in 2002, would the outcome have been similar? I guess we shall never know.

1 posted on 04/26/2003 7:52:22 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.
Seems to me that the NAACP should be complaining to the Democratic Party for holding their Presidential Debate next week in South Carolina, too!
2 posted on 04/26/2003 7:56:16 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
The NAACP boycott of GA is just a method to boost black voter turnout in 2004. The NAACP tried the same gimmick in SC last year. THe RATS lost the races for Governor and Senator.
3 posted on 04/26/2003 7:56:17 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
It seems like the Perdue administration and the legislature have "compromised," but the NAACP is still upset with "Confederate roots" on the proposed new flag.

So why did they bother?

It seems like an exercise in futility to appease those who refuse to be appeased.

4 posted on 04/26/2003 7:57:02 AM PDT by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
The new Georgia flag is about as harmless looking as you can get, and the racist NAACP is still being uppity about it. Fine, let 'em boycott. When folks see the new flag, and how benign it is, then see the race-baiters making a big deal of it, maybe it'll finally start to sink in that this issue has never been about slavery, oppression, Jim Crow, or hurt feelings, but merely a way for the NAACP to keep itself in the news, and therefore in power. Let's hope, anyway.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

5 posted on 04/26/2003 8:06:50 AM PDT by wku man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
Perdue originally called for a referendum on a version of Georgia's flag that featured the Dixie cross but backed off after black lawmakers succeeded in defeating the idea.

It appears to me that Perdue LIED to get elected. That’s a novel approach by a politician. I hope they (those that voted him in) learned a valuable lesson in GA. He’s a scoundrel and should be ignored until they can vote him out.
7 posted on 04/26/2003 8:15:20 AM PDT by schaketo (NAALCP and their ilk $uck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
That 'X' ...bringing that 'X' back was totally unacceptable to us."
I am deeply saddened.
8 posted on 04/26/2003 8:16:51 AM PDT by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
It seems like the Perdue administration and the legislature have "compromised," but the NAACP is still upset with "Confederate roots" on the proposed new flag.

Aren't they changing their story here? The original reason they had a problem with the old Georgia flag as that it had the Confederate Battle Flag on it -- which they claimed had been taken over as a symbol of hate by the KKK, neo-Nazis, and others who use it as a racist symbol. Now they have changed their story to claim that if something has "Confederate roots" it is no longer acceptable.

With every move the NAACP edges ever closer to irrelevancy.

12 posted on 04/26/2003 9:38:28 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson