Skip to comments.
Source: Army secretary resigns on Rumsfeld's demand
CNN.com ^
| 4/25/03
Posted on 04/25/2003 9:39:08 PM PDT by Hipixs
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (CNN) --Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld demanded U.S. Army Secretary Tom White step down Friday, a senior Pentagon official said, a move that follows two years of contention between the two.
The official said Rumsfeld called White into his office and demanded his resignation, which White provided.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: army; crusader; rumsfeld; rumsfeldpinglist; thomaswhite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-258 next last
1
posted on
04/25/2003 9:39:08 PM PDT
by
Hipixs
To: *Rumsfeld ping list; lawgirl; Howlin; mystery-ak; mtngrl@vrwc; kayak; swheats; ladyinred; ...
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Rumsfeld, click below: |
|
click here >>> |
Rumsfeld |
<<< click here |
|
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
2
posted on
04/25/2003 9:40:12 PM PDT
by
Hipixs
To: Hipixs
Ahhh...THIS was the guy that went behind his back to the congress. Go Rummy!
3
posted on
04/25/2003 9:41:46 PM PDT
by
lainde
To: Hipixs
Interesting.I wonder if it's all accurate.(demanding the resignation)
4
posted on
04/25/2003 9:43:52 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Hipixs
Shinseki, he of the beret fiasco, will be the next to go.
To: Hipixs
Click
A few other articles.......
6
posted on
04/25/2003 9:49:40 PM PDT
by
deport
(.......Beware of Idiots bearing gifts........)
To: Hipixs; SLB; Squantos; sneakypete; Wally Cleaver; Recon by Fire; Lion Den Dan
Rummy is an idiot. The chosen/anointed Army Chief of Staff, GEN Keane said so by turning down the position.
I don't think there is a replacement yet, and I'd like to know who it might be.
To: Malesherbes
He is gone 1 Jun.
Problem is his replacement has decided to retire also.
Methinks Rummy is stirring the pot.
He has seen how the army fought in GW II and likes the mixture.
Thread heads don't, though.
8
posted on
04/25/2003 9:51:46 PM PDT
by
dts32041
(The power to tax, once conceded, has no limits; it continues until it destroys.- RAH)
To: leadpenny
ping!
To: Hipixs
bump
To: Fred Mertz
Rummy is an idiot.He just oversaw one of the most lopsided military victories in the history of the world. I'm sorry if that's not up to your standards, but Secretary Rumsfeld more than meets my expectations for a Secretary of Defense.
I only wish other federal goverment departments were run as well.
To: Hipixs
Now, if only Rummy would have the same conversation with Powell, and Bush appoints someone prepared to clean house at the State Department. . . ,
12
posted on
04/25/2003 10:02:34 PM PDT
by
TheConservator
(Veni, vidi, vici!--G. W. "Julius" Bush.)
To: Hipixs
This did not happen without the thumbs up from George W. Bush and the replacement will not happen without the thumbs up from George W. Bush. Bush remembers those who go behind his (or his subordinates) back. Thats common knowledge.
They let him serve until the end of the war. He can say that he was Secretary of the Army during the most awesome display of mobile warfare in history. They let him off pretty easy and pretty honorably actually.
13
posted on
04/25/2003 10:05:10 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: 68skylark; Fred Mertz
Amen.
Anyone who thinks "Rummy is an idiot" after this brilliant campaign, that even the British are saying will be studied for years due to its' excellence, isn't playing with a full deck.
14
posted on
04/25/2003 10:06:16 PM PDT
by
justshe
(Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor.)
To: 68skylark
Like I said, he's an idiot. An arrogant one too.
To: deport
What I hear is that most of the military loves Rummy, because he knows what he's talking about and he shoots straight -- but some of the bureaucrats at the Pentagon aren't happy, because the last administration pretty much left them alone, and Rummy is making them work, and holding them to account.
16
posted on
04/25/2003 10:09:51 PM PDT
by
Amelia
(Tag line? What tag line?)
To: Hipixs
did you notice something bizarre in this article? it says:
"Despite widespread speculation that White might be fired, Rumsfeld continued to support him in public, saying at a Pentagon briefing May 7, "I certainly have confidence in Secretary White."
May 7, 2002 was almost a year ago. May 7, 2003 has not yet arrived. so how can a statement made a year ago be interpreted as Rummy "continuing to support him in public?"
Isn't that strange?
17
posted on
04/25/2003 10:09:59 PM PDT
by
fqued
To: Fred Mertz
Like I said, he's an idiot.Well, I guess that's the beautiful thing about living free in America -- you're entitled to your opinion, and I can have mine.
Personally, I'm impressed by the recent victories, and I give a lot of the credit to Secretary Rumsfeld.
To: 68skylark
What do you think of Tom White?
To: 68skylark
"He just oversaw one of the most lopsided military victories in the history of the world. I'm sorry if that's not up to your standards, but Secretary Rumsfeld more than meets my expectations for a Secretary of Defense."
I approve of him 100% as well.
You cant improve these huge bureaucracies without stepping on toes - why people believe the whiners and not the proof in the victories is beyond me.
20
posted on
04/25/2003 10:17:24 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(All Hail The Free Republic of Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-258 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson