Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 years after Waco siege, police face another standoff (Gun Barrel City) - rehash of Waco debacle
The Dallas Morning News ^ | April 19, 2003 | By DAVE HIOTT / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 04/19/2003 9:50:08 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

10 years after Waco siege, police face another standoff


04/19/2003

By DAVE HIOTT / The Dallas Morning News

GUN BARREL CITY, Texas – Sheriff J.R. "Ronny" Brownlowe isn't ready for a showdown. Not like the one 10 years ago a few miles outside Waco.

On Saturday, survivors will mark the passing of a decade since at least 74 people died at the fiery end of the Branch Davidian siege. But for Sheriff Brownlowe's Henderson County deputies, it will only be another day in another standoff, now nearly three years old.

Militant fundamentalist John Joe Gray, 54, retreated to his 47 acres near Cedar Creek Lake about 40 miles southeast of Dallas after warrants were issued for his arrest in May 2000. Seven adults and three children are believed to be holed up on his property, hunting, fishing, planting gardens and patrolling the land with guns.

"The entire thing is not worth one of those children getting hurt," said Sheriff Brownlowe.

Patience may not always work, but Sheriff Brownlowe is willing to try. It's a lesson he and other law officers took from Waco, where those who lived through the 51-day siege still debate whether greater patience could have changed the outcome.

In the past decade the government's handing of the standoff has been held up as an example of how not to deal with militant groups. Negotiators and tactical leaders were sometimes at cross-purposes, especially when FBI commanders, smarting from the deaths of four federal agents during the Feb. 28 gunfight that started the standoff, opted to make a strong show of force to weaken the will of the Branch Davidians.

"I think there was a belief that if you put enough pressure on this group that has killed federal agents... then the psychic glue that holds them together will crack and they'll come in one by one two by two and surrender," said Clint Van Zandt, a lead FBI negotiator at Waco. "Had it worked we all would have said, 'Hooray.' "

It didn't work. The raid – to search the Mount Carmel compound for illegal weapons and arrest sect leader David Koresh on weapons charges – and the tough tactics which followed seemed to confirm the Branch Davidians' belief that they would face an apocalyptic ending in a battle with the government.

Ten Bradley fighting vehicles, two Abrams tanks and five other combat engineer vehicles were brought to the scene to counter the heavily armed sect members.

"How do you protect your agents against a 50 caliber rifle? You put them in a tank," said Danny Coulson, an FBI deputy assistant director at the time of the standoff. "It hurt to see FBI agents in tanks, but on the other hand, would you rather see an FBI agent with his head blown off?"

Breakdown of trust

Negotiators worked constant 12-hour shifts. Dozens of agents, including snipers, surrounded the property northeast of Waco.

Federal agents allowed Branch Davidians to retrieve their dead for burial, gave them medical supplies, milk and food, and even allowed the retrieval of Bible study materials left in a car.

At first, negotiators made steady progress in persuading Mr. Koresh to send out members of the sect, especially children.

On March 2, authorities arranged to have a 58-minute religious message by Mr. Koresh aired on the radio. But he reneged on a promise to surrender afterward, saying God told him to remain inside to write an interpretation of the Seven Seals mentioned in the Book of Revelation.

Trust began to break down.

Dr. Nancy Ammerman, a religion and sociology expert who co-authored a 1993 report to the Justice Department critical of how the FBI handled the standoff, said commanders failed to properly consider the depth of the Branch Davidians' beliefs.

"When they refer to the way Davidians talk as 'Bible babble' then you have to wonder about the level of respect," she said.

Mr. Van Zandt disagreed.

"I was on my phone multiple times calling back to my pastor in Virginia just bouncing ideas off him. ... I spent 2 ½ hours with Koresh one night one-on-one because he wanted to talk to someone who was a Christian."

Mr. Coulson said Mr. Koresh reneged on several promises of surrender. By March 23, 35 people had left the compound, but little trust remained. Only two more sect members would leave before April 19.

Determining tactics

Starving out the Branch Davidians was not an option. Officials believed they had a year's worth of food and plenty of water.

Tactical commanders rejected Mr. Van Zandt's idea to erect a tall fence around the compound and send the military hardware away.

"At a barricade situation like Waco or Ruby Ridge" where federal agents had been killed, "the people involved are anywhere from afraid to pumped up or empowered. ... We denied them the vision of tomorrow."

The FBI's Hostage Rescue Team was headed by Dick Rogers, who developed rules of engagement at Ruby Ridge, Idaho. That 11-day standoff in 1992 followed a gunfight in which a federal marshal and the 14-year-old son of separatist Randy Weaver were killed. Mr. Weaver's wife was shot by an FBI sniper while holding her baby and standing in the doorway of her home during the standoff.

Mr. Rogers has left the FBI and could not be reached for comment. As the standoff dragged on, he was ready to force a showdown with Mr. Koresh. "Being nice to him was playing right into his hands," Mr. Rogers has said.

As the days dragged into weeks, the FBI cut off the electricity, used "flash bang" devices to set off loud but harmless explosions, blared music and recordings of the sounds of rabbits being slaughtered into the compound, and directed blinding spotlights at the building during the night.

The armored vehicles, which were disarmed, were driven around the site at all hours to keep the sect members off guard.

Mr. Rogers and negotiators were often at odds during the standoff. Mr. Van Zandt, like other negotiators, said both Waco and Ruby Ridge "put negotiators in conflict with tactical teams... in both cases tactical teams won out and they ended in a way government wished they wouldn't."

Mr. Rogers endorsed using tear gas to end the standoff.

He told Justice Department interviewers in 1993: "I have never commented to any investigators concerning negotiations because I don't view it as having a lot to do with the outcome at Waco. I think given enough time, any negotiator could get them out if there was no suicide, but what is enough time?"

Beginning of the end

The tear gas proposal went to Attorney General Janet Reno on April 12 although some outside experts and FBI agents worried that the sect might commit mass suicide. Concerned about the children because of sex abuse allegations against Mr. Koresh, Ms. Reno approved the plan on April 17 after several days of debate.

Mr. Van Zandt said FBI tactics used against the Branch Davidians had only brought the group closer together and limited the possibility of surrender. "Koresh was the core of a bomb," he said.

Although Mr. Koresh's mother, Bonnie Haldeman, said her son "never, never" believed in suicide, she acknowledged that "on a human level it would have been very hard for him" to surrender.

Beginning at 6 a.m. on April 19, loudspeakers ordered sect members to walk out and surrender. Armored vehicles began to ram the building, punching holes into the structure and inserting tear gas.

Bugging devices secretly inserted into the walls of the compound recorded Branch Davidians after the attack began and before the fire saying things such as, "Have you poured it yet?" and "David said we have to get the fuel on" and, the last statement recorded,"Let's keep that fire going."

Mr. Koresh chose suicide by fire rather than surrender. His prophecy of a final battle against the government was self-fulfilling.

"The Davidians started the fires," said Mr. Van Zandt. "The only question is, did the government put them in a position to facilitate that, and the answer is probably yes."

That lesson is not lost on Sheriff Brownlowe, still patiently awaiting Mr. Gray's surrender. The former member of an anti-government militia is wanted on felony charges after biting a state trooper and trying to grab his gun during a traffic stop. He now faces weapons charges, too.

The family has a well, but no running water. They have a small generator for limited power, but the electricity was cut off long ago.

"At some point in time that's got to get old," said Sheriff Brownlowe. "They're prisoners on their own property."

It may not be too late for Mr. Gray and his family, but the Branch Davidians are a dying religious sect.

Forensics specialists could never determine how many died from gunshot wounds inflicted by the Branch Davidians or from the roaring inferno. Some burned bodies were fused together and specialists could not differentiate between them. But the Branch Davidians say 74 died in the fire, including more than 20 children. And two unborn children are believed to have died.

"All these faces of Waco are like ghosts sliding past you one at a time," said Mr. Van Zandt. "You have to say, 'Was it foolhardy or was it not? Did you die for a good cause or die uselessly?' "

E-mail dhiott@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/tsw/stories/041903dntexwaco.6bdbe.html


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: branchdavidians; gunbarrelcity; policestandoff; texas; waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last
Most of this article is a re-hash of the Waco, Texas Branch Davidian disaster. I expect (hope) this one turns out better.
1 posted on 04/19/2003 9:50:08 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
10 years later and they're still debating whether they did the right thing? Here's a hint... if you're going after US citizens with tanks, chances are you've exceeded your Constitutional authority!
2 posted on 04/19/2003 9:52:34 AM PDT by thoughtomator (I predict hysteria at the UN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
BUMP (also for later read, I know these communities of Gun Barrel City and Mabank).
3 posted on 04/19/2003 9:55:50 AM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"I think there was a belief that if you put enough pressure on this group that has killed federal agents...

The Branch Davidians did not kill any federal agents until the federal agents conducted an armed assault on their home.

I hope every single one of the BATF goons present that day suffer long, lingering, painful cancer deaths.

4 posted on 04/19/2003 10:11:36 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
No 'rule of law' for you huh ...
5 posted on 04/19/2003 10:14:46 AM PDT by _Jim (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I hope every single one of the BATF goons present that day suffer long, lingering, painful cancer deaths.

Why don't you stick out your tongue at them too?

6 posted on 04/19/2003 10:17:01 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
People only have respect for the law when the law has respect for them.

The Feds could have arrested Koresh on numerous occasions when he went on his daily jogs outside of the compound. Instead, they chose to put on their ninja gear, fire up the heavy armour, and make a big show of their "might." And many innocent people were killed by their own government.

So if that's what "rule of law" means, then to that I say, "No, thank you."
7 posted on 04/19/2003 10:20:57 AM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
if you're going after US citizens with tanks,

Another opinion formed as a result of a failure to read the article or know what truely transpired -

- the Davadians were armed, they fired on those surronding the compound with regularity, they had weaponry up through 50 caliber - YOU tell US what it's safe to be 'riding around in'.

8 posted on 04/19/2003 10:21:09 AM PDT by _Jim (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
The Feds could have arrested

An old saw oft repeated with no basis in proof.

Vernon Wayne Howell and his henchmen had the compound and the area roads *around* the compound under surveilance 'round the clock - the sight of armed federalis rolling down the road in plain brown wrapped Caprices would have resulted in a radio call to Howell and the beginning of 'siege' right then and there ...

"Due Process" to a Davidian was whatever Vernon Wayne Howell decteed it to be - JUST ask those surviving children if that ain't true ...

9 posted on 04/19/2003 10:26:06 AM PDT by _Jim (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: _Jim; honway; OKCSubmariner; MizSterious; Lurker; thinden
I see you have the weekend shift, underscoreJim.

Van Zandt and Coulson are the designated fed propagandists, so I discount most of this article as bunk.
10 posted on 04/19/2003 10:26:11 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
so I discount most of this article as bunk.

Face it - ANYTHNG not in agreement with the opinions you formed while watching McNutty's propaganda piece Waco: Rules of Engagement is bunk.

11 posted on 04/19/2003 10:30:07 AM PDT by _Jim (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
decteed it to be ==> "decreed it to be"
12 posted on 04/19/2003 10:31:22 AM PDT by _Jim (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
the Davadians were armed, they fired on those surronding the compound with regularity, they had weaponry up through 50 caliber - YOU tell US what it's safe to be 'riding around in'.

Thats funny the film i have of the event show no firing coming from the compound but atf agents fireing feircly at the compound one agent shot himself in the leg 2 agents go in a window and imediatly after another agent throws in a grenade then returning gunfire comes from the room through the wall looks to me like the atf agents were eliminating each other .

Waco: The Big Lie

Linda Thompson

Using outakes of satellite footage shot by a local news station, director Linda Thompson paints a chilling portrait of the ATF and FBI's military assault on the Branch Davidian's compound in Waco. Thompson argues convincingly that the ATF's initial assault on Mt. Carmel was legally grounded on nothing more than a $200 weapons surchage that Koresh had failed to pay. With proof of that in their back pocket, the ATF called out U.S. Army gunships, and attacked the compound with dozens of stoked, reckless agents employing massive gunpower. The footage on this video demonstrates that the Branch Davidians did not meet the ATF with "a hail of gunfire." You'll see unthreatened ATF agents riddling the front of the compound with gunfire, fully aware that inside were dozens of women and children. The ATF had plenty of time to shoot not only the house; they fired on themselves, other agents, children playing outside, long before a Branch Davidian fired a single shot in self defense. The video also details the FBI's effective bamboozlement of a compliant press, but the most controversial part of the tape comes at the end, when Thompson provides footage allegedly showing government tanks with flamethrowers that she contends set the fire that killed all 89 people inside. You may (and should) question some of what this video contends, but it does contain actual footage of a government attacking its own citizens. Not that that hasn't happened before. But now it's on videotape.

13 posted on 04/19/2003 10:31:29 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (*** If your not bruising your heel on the devils head your not stomping hard enough ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
What crap.

You EVEN have the gall to include work by the already discredited so-called director Linda Thompson .

14 posted on 04/19/2003 10:33:53 AM PDT by _Jim (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
From *your* tagline:

    If your [instead of "you're"] not bruising your heel ..

Ahem ... your 'level' of education is showing ...

15 posted on 04/19/2003 10:37:54 AM PDT by _Jim (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw; _Jim; Poohbah
Three years? Waste of damn time and money. Time for Darwin's broom to sweep that goofy little compound, and to find a sheriff with a pair. You can't enable armed standoffs, because they spread like cancer among the goofy, and while I completely understand some reluctance on the part of the sheriff if he knows these people, 3 years is too much.

On a side note, wonder if they cut off their internet access in there, and what this guys FReeper handle is?

16 posted on 04/19/2003 10:38:35 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (going into an election campaign without the paleocons is like going to war without the French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: MeeknMing
debate whether greater patience could have changed the outcome.

Greater patience would only have allowed the attack plan to be further improved in order to preclude any survivors at all.

18 posted on 04/19/2003 10:39:05 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Interesting... nothing in this article says what the warrants are issued for in this new case.

They're trying to convict this guy with another case.

19 posted on 04/19/2003 10:40:39 AM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Concerned about the children because of sex abuse allegations against Mr. Koresh, Ms. Reno approved the plan on April 17 after several days of debate.

Sycophant alert, the author's polluted mind revealed. The "I did it for the children" excuse reported as fact beyond doubt. Throw the entire article in the toilet where it belongs.

20 posted on 04/19/2003 10:42:14 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson