Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Deal with the Republican Guard
AR Action Report on line ^ | 04/15/03 | Walid Rabbah

Posted on 04/17/2003 7:33:16 AM PDT by bert

The Deal

Walid Rabbah, exclusive.

ONE day after the start of the war against Iraq American Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld appeared on American television screens to say something that the press interpreted as some sort of American propaganda. In reality, though, it was the basis for what was later to take place.

Donald RumsfeldRumsfeld said that there had been communications between the Americans and leaders in the Republican Guard in Iraq. He said that the details could not be disclosed now, but urged listeners to wait for coming days.

Three days later the American media played an audio tape on which recorded voices could be heard speaking in Arabic guiding American forces to important bombing targets. The voices were translated immediately in the headquarters of the American forces so that orders could be issued accordingly.

In fact, Rumsfeld was not just talking at random. There had been communications that took place in total secrecy between the leaders of the Republican Guard and the Commanders of Saddam's Fedayeen, unbeknownst to the Iraqi leader and his son who was in charge of a huge military organization that could have made life hell for the American forces had they joined the battle.

The communications grew in intensity after the Republican Guard entered its first battle against the American forces in the environs of Baghdad, and after much of its equipment was destroyed. The Americans could see that they were facing a force with high military preparedness, one that was well trained and could inflict tremendous losses on the American forces whenever they tried to enter Baghdad.

The offer proposed by the American command in Iraq to the Republican Guard and Saddam's Fedayeen was generous. The offers were run past Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, who okayed them immediately. The provided for:

1. In return for not opposing American forces and for laying down their weapons, the United States will give the following:

2. As a guarantee of this (which the commanders of the Republican Guard did not completely trust), the United States disclosed some of its agents whom it had planted among the "human shields" who were guiding the American military to positions to be bombed and where President Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi leadership could be found. A brief meeting was held between one of the agents serving as a "human shield" and some members of the Republican Guard during which the latter were handed official written documents addressed to the first echelon of the Republican Guard. These reassured the Republican Guard commanders that the assurances were reliable. The documents provided for:

Human Shields

From the beginning, the heads of the American Central Intelligence Agency followed a plan to use the work of agents posing as "human shields." The CIA chiefs used peace activists in America carefully and systematically. They sent three groups of peace activists to the region, and in particular into Baghdad on the basis that that would be the place where the decisive battle would be fought.

The deception worked with the Iraqi leaders who placed different groups of human shields in important places such as: factories and manufactories that had great importance for the population. Storehouses of weapons belonging to the Republican Guard were located inside those factories and manufactories, and this fact was openly acknowledged. But inside, hidden under ground, there were huge stockpiles of weapons sufficient for waging a resistance struggle for years. These were ostensibly civilian installations but on the inside were military. These included centers where rockets were gathered for destruction under the UN supervised program, while some of them were stored in underground military storehouses.

The Iraqi measures, whereby they distributed the human shields to vital locations, was in fact a trap set for the Iraqis, for the human shields carried difficult-to-detect delicate communication devices for communicating with the American forces during the bombing. It later became clear that these devices played an outstanding role in pinpointing the positions of Saddam and his leaders, as well as places where weapons were being stored.

Occupation of the Airport

The occupation of Saddam International Airport was a turning point inasmuch as it enabled the American forces to carry out their entire plan as it had been detailed in the documents that they had been given and as they had been promised. The commanders of the Republican Guard were reassured, in particular those of the first echelon, that what the American forces had promised them was the truth. The Republican Guard commanders then provided complete information about the various military positions around the airport and inside of it. They also gave complete information about the tunnels that extended from the Republican Palace to inside the airport, tunnels that had been built especially so that the Iraqi president could use them should he ever be in danger. American forces occupied these tunnels, unknown to any but the first echelon of the Republican Guard.

On the second day after the occupation of the airport Muhammad Sa`id as-Sahhaf assured the world that Saddam International Airport was still in the hands of the Iraqi forces. He based his assurances on a promise of an "innovative and unusual" sort of response, as he put it, when Iraqi fighters and Republican Guards would sweep from the palace through the tunnels and on towards the airport in a surprise attack on the American forces occupying the airport. He did not know even as he spoke that American forces had discovered the location of those secure tunnels and that they would confront the small numbers of Iraqis who were sent there, under the leadership of third echelon commanders of the Republican Guard, and who would find the Americans waiting for them.

Time at that difficult juncture was golden. The American forces saw that the road had opened up to Baghdad, so they carried out two essential operations simultaneously:

The first operation: to introduce tanks to the approaches of Baghdad from where they would penetrate to the area of the Palestine Hotel, on condition that they would not cross the bridge to the opposite bank. This occurred after they were sure that orders had been issued to the Republican Guard to disappear in accordance with the "secret plan" to which the first echelon commanders had already alerted their junior officers.

The second operation: to prepare a military transport plane of at least 200 seats to transport the first echelon commanders of the Republican Guard and some members of the second echelon to secure locations.

The orders given to the American soldiers who advanced to secure a bridgehead for the rest of their forces were as follows:

First: attempt to silence the media that were transmitting pictures of the places where the breakthrough was occurring (this is what took place when the offices of al-Jazeera TV, and the Abu Dhabi TV station, were shelled) and to try to herd the journalists into a place from which they could not move, except by order of the coalition forces, or, to be precise, the US Marines.

Second: To cut communications and electricity off from the area and to attempt to shell the little electricity generators in the area in order to completely knock out any means for transmission once and for all.

Third: To shell the satellite dishes on the roof of the Palestine Hotel. It was here where the al-Jazeera journalist Tariq Ayyoub was martyred. Fourth: To deal with the limited resistance in the area of the bridge with small arms rather than with artillery bombardment because some of the second echelon the Republican Guard were too late to reach the appointed meeting places in time and might possibly have to reach the coalition forces by crossing the Sanak Bridge.

Military Aircraft

The American military aircraft took off from Saddam International airport at 8:00 p.m. on the third day of the occupation of the airport. Some sources in the American command maintain that the plane flew directly to the United States, via Germany. Others say that it took them by way of Kuwait. What is certain, however, is the fact that they left for the United States. At the same time two helicopters were whisking the second echelon commanders of the Republican Guard to Basra where they were met by British forces.

 

 

Happier times:
When Saddam secretly met Rumsfeld

 

 

 

The Fate of Saddam Hussein

Some American political sources maintain that those secret communications between Republican Guard commanders and the Americans took place according to American instructions that were issued to the Republican Guard leaders so as to prevent their being detected. The most modern technology was used, including tiny transmitter-receiver devices that had been given to the Republican Guard Commanders in their first meeting with the Human Shields. This is the secret of how they kept Saddam Hussein in the dark about their contacts.

The final task of the Republican Guard Commanders gathered at the airport was to give the important information about the location of the Iraqi president and his leadership in what was to be their last meeting in al-Mansour. This information enabled the American forces to aim at the place where the meeting was being held and strike it with guided missiles. Most probably the Iraqi President and his leadership, including his two sons, were killed in the bombardment. None of the leadership was saved from that attack except Muhammad Sa`id as-Sahhaf, the Information Minister, whose whereabouts are still unknown. He alone among the members of the leadership was out of the area at the time of the attack, which came shortly after he delivered a press statement in front of the Palestine Hotel that day.

Saddam's Family

The American Authorities have kept quiet about the whereabouts of Saddam's family, in particular the women and children among them, although they know where they are, and whether they are living or dead. There are some reports that they are in Syria. Others have said that they slipped away to Tikrit. In fact, however, the American forces bombed the location where the family was staying and were able to catch the whole family together after they slipped away to the place where the President's half-brother Barzan at-Tikriti was staying. When his house near Baghdad was bombed the family was wiped out.

A Final Word: This information was leaked by American sources. Nevertheless, it should be more than 75 percent true because it originated with political and not military personnel.

One question remains: Where did those mountains of weapons go? Where did the forces who "melted away" into the angry Iraqi population go?But one major question remains open. If they did not find the bodies of Saddam, his leaders and his two sons, the matter remains a source of embarrassment. Coming weeks will no doubt provide us much more information


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arabmedia; arabstreet; baathists; baghdad; baghdadbob; centcom; decapitation; espionage; iraq; iraqifreedom; republicanguard; saddam; saddamsdeath; strategy; thedeal; war; warplan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: wideawake
We know that in reality committed Iraqi commanders were losing hundreds of soldiers a day to desertion.

Can you desert to hell?

21 posted on 04/17/2003 8:07:37 AM PDT by pgyanke (Please, Lord, prevent unnecessary casualties in this conflict...and maximize the necessary ones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

I liked the part where he says the fact that we haven't disclosed the huge underground weapons stockpile is proof of its existence.

Does that mean that since we haven't disclosed we got Saddam out by using a Transporter is proof that we have a Transporter??

"Beam me up, Scotty."
22 posted on 04/17/2003 8:09:37 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bert
Granting American citizenship and residency in the United States to some of the first echelon commanders and their families, depending on their wishes

The Secretary of Defense has no authority to do that. Frankly, this whole article sounds bogus.

23 posted on 04/17/2003 8:10:12 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
This is great agiprop for the Arab street who feel the USA used trickery and deception to defeat a great Arab army. I call BS.
24 posted on 04/17/2003 8:10:17 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
agit, agi, you know what I mean.
25 posted on 04/17/2003 8:10:43 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bert
A note on your source:

This is a translation of an 4/14 Arabic article from a Lebanese paper. Go to the link and note the comments by Eric Mueller, the "arabist" who translated it. E.g. "the Anglo-American aggression againt Iraq," and reference to the cooperation of Iraqi forces with the coalition as "The Great Betrayal." Mueller also informs us that this article "feels" like it was originally written in English, and claims that it is overly favorable to the American side of things. IOW, without saying so, he's darkly hinting that the article was planted by an American source.

Anybody heard of the p.o.s. before? It might help if you knew that this website he is working/providing content for belongs to David Irving, the infamous holocaust denier. Why does it not surprise me that the brown-shirts are marching with the green-crescents?

26 posted on 04/17/2003 8:12:15 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Second, I guess will not be able to use the "human shield" trojan horse again soon.

My first thought when I read that was that in future military actions, human shields will be not only unwelcome, but will probably be assumed to be CIA. Well, now, won't that be a shame? (not!)

27 posted on 04/17/2003 8:13:44 AM PDT by MizSterious ("The truth takes only seconds to tell."--Jack Straw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
...**betrayal** led to Saddam's defeat, not coalition military skill....

There are two sides to this truth of betrayal. The coalition saught and received the betrayals. There is no loss of honor for seeking and obtaining the capitulation.

It will be seen as a different weapon used to subdue Saddam. Money, plain old US$, did the trick when used along with extreme skill.

Could have any others pulled this off? No! certainly not.

The message still remains......"Don't screw with America. Those boys are good!"

28 posted on 04/17/2003 8:14:53 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bert
"Where did those mountains of weapons go?"

WMDs are another story, but I'm still in awe in the amount of conventional weapons in Iraq including RPGs, artillery shells, and AKs. That country was loaded! I believe I saw on Fox that 50,000 AKs were melted in Tikrit yesterday. WMDs we'll find but we've already found UN 'proscribed' weapons including heat seeking SAMs.
29 posted on 04/17/2003 8:16:00 AM PDT by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Yes, that "comment" on the side of the article was nauseating in itself, to use his own word... Here is the "commentary."

Eric Mueller comments:

THIS report from the newspaper, "Sawt al-`Urouba" clearly originates from an American source. As one translates it, it "feels" as though it was once written in English.

It also has the typical boastful "Americans never make mistkakes" "Americans always outsmart everybody" tone that has become so nauseatingly predominant in coverage of the Anglo-American aggression againt Iraq, and it makes no mention of certain things that might be embarrassing for the US and which are now leaking out elsewhere in Arabic.

Nevertheless it does bring out a number of interesting details and is the longest report on the Great Betrayal that I have seen so far. There have been other reports in the Arabic press that in broad outlines have told the same tale.

Arabist Eric Mueller is this website's expert on Middle Eastern affairs.
30 posted on 04/17/2003 8:17:51 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bert
Third: To shell the satellite dishes on the roof of the Palestine Hotel. It was here where the al-Jazeera journalist Tariq Ayyoub was martyred.

I'm not buying it. This is far too detailed for some outsider to have knowledge of.

31 posted on 04/17/2003 8:18:13 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; AmericanInTokyo
"Frankly, this whole article sounds bogus."

Perhaps, but Fox commentators have been hinting at something like this. True or not, it spells trouble for the "human shields"--which gives me no end of satisfaction. No one will ever trust them again.

32 posted on 04/17/2003 8:18:49 AM PDT by MizSterious ("The truth takes only seconds to tell."--Jack Straw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bert
From the beginning, the heads of the American Central Intelligence Agency followed a plan to use the work of agents posing as "human shields."

Sure fooled us. This is great, I wonder what the "real idiot shields" think about the fact that they were providing cover for the CIA. Dear diary.

33 posted on 04/17/2003 8:19:46 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
From the beginning, the heads of the American Central Intelligence Agency followed a plan to use the work of agents posing as "human shields." The CIA chiefs used peace activists in America carefully and systematically. They sent three groups of peace activists to the region, and in particular into Baghdad on the basis that that would be the place where the decisive battle would be fought.

Somehow this sent my BS meter off the charts.

34 posted on 04/17/2003 8:22:12 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
You're right, of course. I was parsing it from the point of view of Mideast moral lepers.
35 posted on 04/17/2003 8:22:22 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
I'm sorry I left out the side bar. You accurately included the commentary.

I am convinced that many Iraqi military made agreements that saved Iraq from great loss of life and infrastructure destrucion, either by Iraqi or coalition hands.

Saddam called and asked "Is Paris burning?" and they all replied "Yes Sir!"

I hope that history learns soon from firsthand accounts rather than sources such as the one posted.

36 posted on 04/17/2003 8:22:29 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: Always Right
Imagine how they'll treat the next group of "human shields".
38 posted on 04/17/2003 8:23:02 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: seamole
On the bright side, all future "human shields" are guaranteed to experience intrusive body cavity searches.

To some of the fags that would be a perk.

39 posted on 04/17/2003 8:24:43 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
OTOH, regarding the Human Shields.... remember when Baghdad Bob had them all rounded up and brought to the Palestine Hotel? Perhaps there is a note of truth to this part of the story... perhaps Baghdad Bob didn't want those Human Shields out there working for "US" any longer, so he had them brought to the hotel where he could keep them under his thumbs, er... his guns.
40 posted on 04/17/2003 8:26:35 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson