I don't think this is a good idea at all.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: John Lenin
Identity theft writ large! Wheeeeeeeeeeee.
To: Willie Green
ping!
To: John Lenin
"The very notion of transmitting confidential tax data - from Social Security and employer identification numbers to financial information - to any foreign country, even Canada, borders on the reprehensible at best, and is treasonous at worst," Caroll fumed."
Of course after having your bank account hacked, the IRS will tell you that's no excuse for your check that you wrote to them bouncing. Time to implement the flat tax now. What's the point in getting an accounting degree if this is the way we will operate as a nation.
4 posted on
04/16/2003 5:09:02 PM PDT by
Beck_isright
("QUAGMIRE" - French word for "unable to find anyone to surrender to")
To: John Lenin
I don't think this is a good idea at all.Where's the value added here?
Wouldn't it make more sense to streamline the accounting laws to uncomplicate the process rather than export the inefficiency to foreign accountants?
Nothing against the Indians, they are smart people and good workers, but this is crummy!
To: John Lenin
"...treasonous..." ... wrote Prof Lloyd Caroll, head of the accounting department at Manhattan Borough Community College.
LOL!
To: John Lenin
Wow! I can hardly believe this. I'm totally wigged out. Checking with my accountant ASAP.
To: John Lenin
Here's the job future in America. Young (and not so young) people will have to receive training in skills that are not easily exportable.
You can't send the leaking plumbing in your house to India for repair. If your heat pump stops working, you won't send it overseas for repair. If you need a new transmission in your car, you won't send it to China for a rebuild.
To: John Lenin
I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS! It's hard enough to try to keep things private when the U.S. laws are hanging over people. But to send our tax returns outside of the U.S.? No law applies to violations of privacy in this case. And, as someone else points out, identity theft will be rampant, as well as other abuses. Whoever authorized this needs to go to jail.
33 posted on
04/16/2003 5:37:39 PM PDT by
Rocky
To: John Lenin
Meet your IRS: Punja Chakrabarti![](http://home.bellsouth.net/coDataImages/p/Groups/111/111152/pages/259453/FunnyGlasses-PaintedFaceMan.jpg)
38 posted on
04/16/2003 5:44:19 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(Politics = Poly + Ticks = Many bloodsucking vermin)
To: John Lenin
BTTT for later...
39 posted on
04/16/2003 5:44:27 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Thank You to ALL Freepers and Lurkers who support Free Republic!)
To: John Lenin
Can we outsource lawyering? That would put a dent in the Democrats' coffers!
45 posted on
04/16/2003 5:50:38 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Wheat is Murder! (Tilling slaughters worms.....))
To: John Lenin
There is a good chance the Indians will lose the forms and the IRS will have to sue them.
To: John Lenin
Once again I will post this link.
The Fair Tax
- No divulging of income to the Imperial Federal Government
- No corporate taxes (as if they exist anyway)
- A very very significantly reduced IRS
- No taxes on used goods or necessities
- No coerced class envy
- More money in your pocket
- No violations of your First and Fifth amendment rights (see #1)
- Lower prices on everything
- The "poor" will still pay no taxes
- More government revenue
What's the problem here? Am I so misinformed thinking that this would work. This seems to me to certainly be the way to go. We don't need cuts we need REFORM AND WE NEED IT NOW!
This is an EXCELLENT idea. For once, we are exporting
nonproductive work to other countries. Since tax-law compliance is a net burden on productive businesses, why shouldn't they minimize the cost by getting it done as cheaply as possible?
And the Indian workers know how to set up and use secure Web servers. Let's not condescend to think they're incapable of secrecy. In any event, it's a matter to be decided by the accounting firms and their business clients, not Congress.
Cut the tax rates to keep the productive jobs at home, and we'll have a proper combination. Conservatives who say they espouse free enterprise -- if there are any around here -- should support both moves.
63 posted on
04/16/2003 6:25:29 PM PDT by
Greybird
("War is the health of the State." -- Randolph Bourne)
To: John Lenin
90 posted on
04/16/2003 8:39:39 PM PDT by
busybody
To: John Lenin
I don't think this is a good idea at all.
You're not an American CPA charging big bucks to do someone's taxes and living like a parasite off the misery created by the U.S. tax code, are you?
98 posted on
04/16/2003 9:06:47 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: John Lenin
We're setting ourselves up for one hell of a fall. In the future, terrorists won't need to fly jumbo jets into skyscrapers to attack America, they can simply cut a few strands of trans-Pacific fiber and watch our economy implode as the "workforce" is disconnected from the "home office". Of course, I figure that the chronic unemployment caused by millions of outsourced jobs will probably be imploding our economy on its own by then.
The U.S. was created as a free market, but even the founding fathers understood the need to impose tarriffs to protect our own citizens from foreign predation. We need a 500% yearly "job export" tarriff NOW, but since both the Republicans and Democrats seem to be quite comfortable in their corporate-pocket homes, I doubt we'll see that any time soon.
To: John Lenin
Nice to know it is not going to red china... or that the tax payer owes them not the processing cost (sarcasm)
To: John Lenin
WTF??
120 posted on
04/17/2003 8:32:09 PM PDT by
Hunterb
To: John Lenin
WTF??2
121 posted on
04/17/2003 8:33:46 PM PDT by
Hunterb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson