Skip to comments.
9-11 Insider Traders: Why don't we know who they are—or more importantly—why don't we care?
Sierre Times ^
| 4/14/2003
| Micahel Gaddy
Posted on 04/15/2003 12:34:46 PM PDT by JohnGalt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
...
1
posted on
04/15/2003 12:34:47 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
2
posted on
04/15/2003 12:36:00 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Become a Monthly Donor to Free Republic. Please?)
To: All
The king and queen of the free ride
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
04/15/2003 12:36:33 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: JohnGalt
Thanks for posting this. I was just wondering the other day what had happened to this investigation.
4
posted on
04/15/2003 12:39:59 PM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
A few things don't smell right; I hope there's no cover-up.
5
posted on
04/15/2003 12:47:09 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Help me decide: Is the Left morally corrupt and intellectually bankrupt, or vice versa?)
To: JohnGalt
This is a huge part of the 9/11 story for me. Those who profited and bankrolled 9/11. Why we didnt do more to go after the ultra-wealthy Saudi Bin Laden clan is a bit odd. I would like to see the entire Bin Laden family wiped out.
6
posted on
04/15/2003 12:50:47 PM PDT
by
optik_b
To: JohnGalt
Tin-Foil Hat Alert!
7
posted on
04/15/2003 12:50:54 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
To: headsonpikes
Cover-up implies it was not done out in the open.
Iraq began as revenge for 9/11 but morphed into 'Iraqi freedom' where we celebrate the 'liberation' of the oppressed Iraqi people. It was merely a case of redirecting the short attention span of Americans.
8
posted on
04/15/2003 12:51:22 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(Class of '98)
To: JohnGalt
I hate to say this but the most aggressive short fund running at the time of the attack was the firm that was wiped out except for their CEO. Can't think of the name but you all remember it. Wouldn't it be evil genius to have blinded business people with the potential for unlimited windfall and then have those very people eliminated along with the proof of complicity. I am not alleging anything, but it would make for a great movie.
9
posted on
04/15/2003 12:56:32 PM PDT
by
kinghorse
To: theDentist
Do you believe that Saddam played a role in 9/11 or did you cease caring with the thrill of regime change for the Iraqi people?
10
posted on
04/15/2003 12:57:43 PM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(Class of '98)
To: JohnGalt
Good article. Thanks for the posting.
To: JohnGalt
Do you believe that Saddam played a role in 9/11 or did you cease caring with the thrill of regime change for the Iraqi people?Speaking of morphing, when did the war on international terrorism become a war of retribution for 9/11?
I must have missed that one with my short attention span.
To: JohnGalt
This has been on my mind since I first heard of it. Thanks for the post.
13
posted on
04/15/2003 1:03:18 PM PDT
by
Djarum
To: JohnGalt
I thought that buying an uncovered put contract was selling short. If it is covvered, it is a hedge. However, I'm confused by the way the author uses "put options" in the article. Typically, a put or call contract is for 100 shares of stock. So are they saying that they had bought 2,000+ put contracts, or one contract to buy 2,000+ shares? In the first instance, it appears that the total option count would be around 200,000+ shares. This means that for every $1.00 drop from the strike price, there would be a corresponding $200,000+ profit.
To: kinghorse
Imagine a situation where one greedy brokerage would take a call from a very wealthy ME magnate that there was good information an attack would take place which would shake the markets to their collective foundations. Set up the shorts and wait only to find out the catastrophe involved erasing the very firm involved in the conspiracy. Cold irony.
I may indulge my creative side and write a screenplay.
To: JohnGalt
16
posted on
04/15/2003 1:06:25 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Nancy = Bipolar - "This has been a public service announcement")
To: kinghorse
Cantor Fitz?
To: GovernmentShrinker
That's them...
18
posted on
04/15/2003 1:09:15 PM PDT
by
L,TOWM
(Liberals, The Other White Meat)
To: JohnGalt
I was very interested in the story when it came out.
But I recall that investigations were carried out and the transactions were traced and found to be unconnected with one another, and either commercial or legitimate investment flows.
19
posted on
04/15/2003 1:11:02 PM PDT
by
APBaer
To: JohnGalt
"911" = "emergency"
"75 times normal puts" = "making big money"
"Smart" is knowing what doors to leve open to guaratee a burgler.
"Hidden" and "powerful" is what Dudes are that need to shock the people back into submission with the money making machine.
I am still wondering who the real murderers are? Atre they the ones that pulled the trigger, or those that benefited from the aftermath?
20
posted on
04/15/2003 1:13:12 PM PDT
by
RISU
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson