Posted on 04/08/2003 9:55:33 AM PDT by HAL9000
BAGHDAD (AFP) - More than 100 children held in a prison celebrated their freedom Tuesday as US marines rolled into northeast Baghdad amid chaotic scenes which saw civilians loot weapons from an army compound, a US officer said.Around 150 children spilled out of the jail after the gates were opened as a US military Humvee vehicle approached, Lieutenant Colonel Fred Padilla told an AFP correspondent travelling with the Marines 5th Regiment.
"Hundreds of kids were swarming us and kissing us," Padilla said.
"There were parents running up, so happy to have their kids back."
"The children had been imprisoned because they had not joined the youth branch of the Baath party," he alleged. "Some of these kids had been in there for five years."
The children, who were wearing threadbare clothes and looked under-nourished, walked on the streets crossing their hands as if to mimic handcuffs, before giving the thumbs up sign and shouting their thanks.
It was not clear who had opened the doors of the prison.
Civilians also took advantage of the collapse of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's authority to grab weapons from an army base, said Group Sergeant Jeff Treiber.
As marines were alerted by radio that civilians had seized weapons, Treiber warned that anyone seen to be armed could be a target of US-British coalition forces.
"With the weapons they are becoming combatants," said Treiber. "If they don't take the weapons they will be fine."
Other residents stole air conditioning units, television sets and furniture from government buildings in an echo of the looting that was seen in the southern city of Basra.
A 19-year-old called Haider said people had been ransacking government compounds since the morning to steal weapons and furniture.
"Since the morning, nine o'clock, they have been looting. They are stealing weapons and I took three doors," he said.
At one stage the marines opened fire after coming under attack from snipers, leaving at least two civilians wounded.
One man needed treatment for gunshot wounds to his stomach and left arm.
But his friend, Abdul Amir Jaffa, said he did not resent the Americans despite the shooting.
"Americans are coming to free us," he told AFP.
The marines became increasingly edgy as crowds of people took to the streets to observe their progress.
"It's a problem with so many people in the area. Its hard to tell if there are enemy forces among them. You have to be careful returning fire with civilians all over the place," Lieutenant Anthony Sousa said.
Troops from the Marines' 1st Expeditionary Force also entered Baghdad on the east of the city Tuesday as thousands of armoured vehicles and Humvees poured into the capital for a showdown with Saddam Hussein's troops.
Interesting question. You could make the argument that the GHW Bush administration left office under the illusion that conditions were set to ultimately cause regime change in Iraq (sanctions, inspections, etc.) that were later watered down by the "international community" and the clinton administration.
You could also make the argument that the idea of "regime change" in Iraq was never official US policy until 1998. Similarlly, the idea of pre-emptive strikes was not official US policy until 2002. Indeed, most folks in the pre-911 world were averse to the idea of America being the worlds police force (myself included).
Ultimately, I believe a close look at the pro/con arguments used TODAY determine how I would answer your question. The folks who supported the President recognized the threat, and accepted that SH was evil to his own people and would not hesitate to transfer that evil to terrorists who could target Americans. Those who were against the war (largely the anti-Bush left) would universally open their argument against regime change by saying something like, "of course everyone knows Saddam is an evil dictator, but...".
Therefore, those on the left who gave tacit support to Saddam are much more responsible for the attrocities in Iraq based on history and logic. IMO.
It's not a viewpoint they held regarding apartheid South Africa
I wonder if they would have made the same argument regarding Nazi Germany?
... you are blessed to have the level of naivete/innocence that the rest of us have lost in coming to grips with real evil.
That's not an insult - just that you are lucky to have not imagined this level of evil to be possible... and believe me... the rabbit hole goes deeper.
I offered this:
Disgusting, and the left should have NO credibility after this. Also, you know darn well those kids were let loose so that there wouldn't be any photos of them IN prison.
To set the captive free...a mission worthy of a good and great nation.
hawk
Perhaps Saddam had pictures of them enjoying themselves Ritteresquely at the Childrens' Prison.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.