Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jewish lawmakers threaten walk-out over reference to Jesus
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 3, 2003 | Diana Lynne

Posted on 04/03/2003 6:25:58 PM PST by honway

A Maryland minister was barred from giving the opening prayer in the state Senate after he refused to drop a reference to Jesus.

The Rev. David N. Hughes of the Trinity and Evangelical Church of Adamstown, Md., intended to round out his invocation yesterday with the line, "In Jesus' name, Amen." But the sergeant at arms – on the orders of Senate President Thomas Mike Miller Jr. – shut the reverend out of the body's chambers.

Miller issued the orders after two Jewish lawmakers threatened to stage a boycott of the legislative session if the phrase was not removed.

"I'm shocked by the response. I've never had this happen in 26 years," Hughes told the Frederick News-Post. "It just makes me feel that they've taken away my right as an American to pray, and this is the seat of government, and that's scary."

The pastor – a Vietnam veteran – was invited to give the prayer by Republican Sen. Alex Mooney. Hughes was Mooney's fourth guest. The other three were Jewish rabbis.

Opening up legislative sessions with prayer is a longstanding tradition in Maryland, as it is in states across the country. Mooney told WorldNetDaily no one had been barred from giving an invocation before. He sees irony in yesterday's "censorship."

Maryland state Republican Rep. Alex Mooney

"We were the first state to address religious tolerance in our state charter," he told WorldNetDaily. "This just shows a lack of tolerance for peoples' religious views."

Mooney recalled numerous instances of invocations referencing Jesus throughout the four years that he has been in office.

But at the beginning of the session this year, a string of invocations by Baptist preachers invoking the name Jesus Christ sparked debate on the issue. Miller appealed to lawmakers for tolerance and urged they stick to guidelines that call for invocations to be of an ecumenical nature and respectful of all faiths.

Webster's New World Dictionary defines ecumenical as "promoting cooperation or better understanding among differing religious faiths."

Since the debate, the Senate clerk screens prayers ahead of time and flagged the written text submitted by Hughes.

When Sens. Ida Ruben and Gloria Hollinger – both of whom are Jewish – heard of the reference, they asked Mooney to strike it.

"I said, 'Hey, I'll let him pray however he wants to pray. I'm not going to censor him and tell him how he needs to pray,'" Mooney told WND.

Ruben told the Frederick News-Post she then urged Hughes to substitute "messiah" for Jesus, telling him the reference could offend non-Christians and goes against the guidelines.

Neither Ruben nor Miller returned calls seeking comment.

"This is part of my faith," Hughes responded, according to Mooney. "The Gospel says when you pray, pray in Jesus' name."

The senators next asked to be excused from the floor during the prayer.

Paradoxically, a walk-out over a Muslim cleric's prayer opening a Washington state legislative session last month backfired on one Christian lawmaker.

Washington state Republican Rep. Lois McMahan

As WorldNetDaily reported, Rep. Lois McMahan, a Republican from Gig Harbor, Wash., refused to participate in the prayer and declared, "My god is not Muhammed."

"The Islamic religion is so ... part and parcel with the attack on America. I just didn't want to be there, be a part of that," she said in an interview with the Seattle Post Intelligencer. "Even though the mainstream Islamic religion doesn't profess to hate America, nonetheless it spawns the groups that hate America."

But a day later, McMahan apologized on the floor of the state House of Representatives amid mounting furor over her stance.

Debate over invocations is raging elsewhere in the country. As WorldNetDaily reported, several Southern California cities are grappling with threats from both sides of the issue.

Under pressure from the American Civil Liberties Union to quit using the name Jesus Christ in invocations, the city of Lake Elsinore, in Riverside County, decided to eliminate mention of "religious figures." The decree subsequently had the apparent effect of eliminating the prayer altogether, as no local pastors would accept invitations to deliver the prayer, and city councilors adopted moments of silence instead.

The ACLU contends that praying at the request of a government entity is a violation of the First Amendment's prohibition against the establishment of religion.

But the nonprofit United States Justice Foundation, which threatened to sue the city if it failed to reverse its decision, maintains telling a pastor what to pray is a violation of his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion.

The notion of "separation of church and state" is derived from the dissenting opinion of the 1946 Supreme Court case Everson vs. Board of Education, which upheld a program allowing parents to be repaid from state funds for the costs of transportation to private religious schools. The court required only that the state maintain neutrality in its relations with various groups of religious believers.

"The decision in Everson does not rise to the level of being a battle cry for those who would wish to remove every vestige of religion from the public forum," USJF litigation counsel Richard Ackerman asserts.

"There's a push in this country to remove religion from society," Mooney echoed, "from the Supreme Court's decision on the Pledge to the ACLU going after all the Ten Commandments posted across the country. ... Nothing in the church-state relationship allows censorship and the removal of religious values from society."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; christians; ecumenical; hypocrites; jews; liberals; maryland; silliness; watereddown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 861-872 next last
To: Illbay
Of course, in our era of hyper-individualism, where we each think about ourselves, and what WE want to say first

I'm not accusing you of being a liberal, so don't take this the wrong way, but as I read your post it occurred to me that one of the problems liberals run into is that they are the kind of people who worry so much about looking out for the other guy that they find it impossible to defend their own causes and cases. If you're busy arguing for the other guy, who's left to argue on behalf of you? I think that hyper-altruistic impulse is one that really permeates American society to its detriment. Me, I find American individualism rather inspiring.

221 posted on 04/03/2003 7:34:19 PM PST by Hoppean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: honway
That bothers me.. with the way of the world and the way our common enemies are arrayed, I would expect Catholics, (and other) Christians and Jews to be a very tight knit group.

This does not seem to be the case many times and I don't know if I fully understand why.

222 posted on 04/03/2003 7:34:29 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (Frodo sleeps with men...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Perhaps I did. I don't understand how you can request the word Jesus be blocked from being spoken in a government building, then accept Judeo Christian ideals in that very governments precepts. This seems to be a pretty big conflict.
223 posted on 04/03/2003 7:34:37 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Hoppean
Theological hair-splitting aside, keep in mind that not all of the 3% in question has any faith in God

No doubt the same can be said of many who are raised Christian and Muslim, too.

224 posted on 04/03/2003 7:34:42 PM PST by 1 spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If there was no way to make a prayer that would be acceptable to all involved, I might see your point. But in this case there are points of congruence between Christian, Jew and Muslim.

Even Buddhists and Hindus use the generic term "God" to mean deity.

A prayer to God would have been appropriate.
225 posted on 04/03/2003 7:34:45 PM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
NO, sorry if I was not clear.

Until a few decades ago --- that is, for almost 1700 years -- the Catholic church held the Jews as a people responsible for the death of Christ. It was not uncommon --- and many pogroms started this way -- for a Christian upon recognizing a stranger to be a Jew to say to him, "You killed Christ." In Central and Eastern Europe, for centuries, Jewish mothers would not let children out during Easter: those reterning from Church where the death of Christ is reenacted during that holiday would often beat any Jew on the way --- because that Jew killed Christ.

This is where "the same 3% that rejected Christ" comes from. So I merely restated what the current Pope finally stated as well: those people are dead.

If one wants to concentrate on the presently living people, then those not believing that Christ was a messiah are now a majority in the Western world, so why continue to concentrate on 3% (Jews, who do not indeed accept that Jesus was the messiah).

Sorry my post was confusing.

226 posted on 04/03/2003 7:34:55 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
Multi-culturalism BUMP .. well put!

The offended Jewish legislators, in particular, are simply adhering to long-standing leftist doctrines of multi-cultural inclusion. The objective here, of course, is not really inclusion or equality, but a veto over the expressions of the majority. So, they are "offended" at the mention of Jesus.

227 posted on 04/03/2003 7:36:09 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Read this

http://www.sunspot.net/news/local/bal-md.prayer03apr03,0,2538672.story?coll=bal-local-headlines

Jews had nothing to do with the invocation not being given. It was a violation of the rules.

You're doing damage to your fellow Jews by acknowledging guilt and shame for no reason and giving ammunition to those who hate you anyway.
228 posted on 04/03/2003 7:36:35 PM PST by Courier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Buddy...

Everyone has to make a personal choice. You may choose to call it "bigotry."

As you wish. I cannot turn away from what I know to be true.

229 posted on 04/03/2003 7:36:47 PM PST by sauropod (If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
What a judgemental load of garbage! Besides having nothing to do with the argument, your statement is pure anti-Christian hate speech.

I dare you to prove your statement. Please link us to the facts and numbers that validate your nonsense.

230 posted on 04/03/2003 7:37:34 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
You don't need to appologize for them. What they have done will reinforce the perceptions of those weak minded folks who dislike Jews for any reason, but those folks don't need an excuse anyway. If a Christian were doing what they are, I'd oppose it. The only prayer I'll every walk out on, is the one that addresses Satan. Then you'll see nothing but dust in the air where I used to be.
231 posted on 04/03/2003 7:38:03 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If you can't stand the fire...
232 posted on 04/03/2003 7:38:11 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (Yes, let us allow the economies of gerdung, frunk, mexiztlan, chirushcom and canadastan to wither...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; Byron_the_Aussie
Oh no. Byron has you pegged.
233 posted on 04/03/2003 7:38:20 PM PST by sauropod (If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
This does not seem to be the case many times and I don't know if I fully understand why.

Human nature and human history are the reasons why people will never hold hands as one and sing "Kumbayah."

234 posted on 04/03/2003 7:38:58 PM PST by Hoppean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: lizma
Yep.
235 posted on 04/03/2003 7:39:06 PM PST by sauropod (If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The objective here, of course, is not really inclusion or equality, but a veto over the expressions of the majority.

Well said.

236 posted on 04/03/2003 7:39:45 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Courier
You're doing damage to your fellow Jews by acknowledging guilt and shame for no reason

Perhaps you should be addressing your other fellow Jew. As Mr. Reuben has no understanding of our Constitution.


237 posted on 04/03/2003 7:40:30 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (Frodo sleeps with men...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Answer: there are 2 and only 2 master spirits in this world - Christ's and the anti-Christ's. That's why 'the road is narrow'.
238 posted on 04/03/2003 7:40:52 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (Yes, let us allow the economies of gerdung, frunk, mexiztlan, chirushcom and canadastan to wither...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

Comment #239 Removed by Moderator

To: sauropod
Don't forget to bury a chicken at the northern crossroads.
240 posted on 04/03/2003 7:41:13 PM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 861-872 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson