Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Warned That Oil Cannot Provide Funds
Independent (UK) ^ | 4-4-2003 | David Usborne

Posted on 04/03/2003 5:06:07 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: blam
well the first response echos mine
screw the UN!!!!!!!!!!
21 posted on 04/03/2003 5:19:32 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smedley
Better yet--Here's a quarter; call someone who cares.
22 posted on 04/03/2003 5:19:53 PM PST by Arm_Bears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
The reply to the UN-nations should be, "come and get it, just try".
23 posted on 04/03/2003 5:21:05 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If they are screaming now ... wait until we demand the 10 billion dollars in Iraqi funds sitting in French banks :)
24 posted on 04/03/2003 5:21:30 PM PST by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
US Warned

Oh no, not another warning. It's nothing but threats and warnings these days, from people who sure can talk but can't do squat.

Here's another guy that does not understand George W. Bush. He tells us that "the United States... should think twice before assuming it can administer post-conflict Iraq on its own terms." Well, we thought about it more than twice. The UN had every chance to prove that it was more than a worthless debating society, and it failed the test. So now it can conduct worthless debates with itself. The rest of us have a job to do.


25 posted on 04/03/2003 5:21:31 PM PST by Nick Danger (More rallys planned! www.freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
26 posted on 04/03/2003 5:24:53 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blam
Oil and agriculture are the two primary sources of income for Iraq. The U.S., Britain and Poland should be repaid for the expense of booting Saddam and his minions. Selling oil is the easiest way to do that. The repair and rebuilding efforts can also be financed via oil. The beneficiaries of the repair and rebuilding contracts should be at the pleasure of the Iraqi people. It is THEIR money. It is no business of the UN or the EU to dictate how and where those funds are directed.
27 posted on 04/03/2003 5:26:33 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
HAHAHAHA
Watch Our Leader make you eat those words....
The UN cant stand that its criminal relationship with a brutal dictator IS OVER....
28 posted on 04/03/2003 5:29:30 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
SCREW THE UN!!

Exactly what I thought after reading the first sentence.

29 posted on 04/03/2003 5:31:20 PM PST by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
His candid remarks preface what is shaping to become another mammoth struggle between the powers in the UN Security Council over the role of the UN in running Iraq and helping it back to self-government. He said: "Maybe there are people in Washington who can't see round the next corner in the road and don't know where it goes, but eventually will."

What goes around, comes around, and this time the US will be using the veto on anything from the UN, French, Germans or Belgiums.

30 posted on 04/03/2003 5:31:32 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, said: "We are all agreed on the need to have a role for the UN but there needs to be a lot of discussions."

Yes, LOTS and LOTS of 'discussions'. They're about to get into that "quagmire" we've been hearing about.

31 posted on 04/03/2003 5:32:58 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If they don't like the United States "ruling" Iraq, they can always mount a military action. If they've the guts and the means. Otherwise - tough $hit.
32 posted on 04/03/2003 5:35:24 PM PST by jackbill (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
And while they are discussing, we will be pumping oil on behalf of Iraq and using the money for Iraq's reconstruction.

All the while the debating society will make itself UNuseful.
33 posted on 04/03/2003 5:36:11 PM PST by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blam
The UN has never and will never 'help' Iraqis. They want all of Iraq's oil, so they can pay zillions of socialist parasites to keep Iraqi citizens poor an oppressed, thus insureing a neverending cycle of UN 'aid' into Iraq...which will, as is usual with any UN aid operation, rarely actually get to any of the Iraqi people.

In addition, the Axis of Weasels wants their cut of Iraqi oil wealth.

If the UN is allowed to administer Iraq, not a dime of Iraqi oil money is going to enrich the Iraqi people, except for a UN chozen few in the 'elite' ruling class, which the UN will also administer.

34 posted on 04/03/2003 5:36:11 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The dishonest Euro-theives had their snouts in the trough of illegal trade with Iraq for 12 years . Being shut out of New Iraq is the price Europe et al will pay for their perfidy. Too bad.

Iraq is now a military zone under coalition control. Good luck getting in, UN.

Afghanistan showed that the US can do quite nicely in nation rebuilding. Srebenica showed what happens when the UN takes control.
35 posted on 04/03/2003 5:36:47 PM PST by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The man left standing at the end of the day, writes the rules. The Brits have done it many times in past history.
36 posted on 04/03/2003 5:37:30 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Bwahahaha... they had their chance.
37 posted on 04/03/2003 5:37:48 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RippleFire
You got it. That's how the media lies while still telling the truth.
38 posted on 04/03/2003 5:38:30 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
Let the UN have the lovely job of "peacekeeping", while the US/UK controls the new Iraqi government and its oil supply. How's that for a compromise?
39 posted on 04/03/2003 5:40:54 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blam
Russia, France and Germany are the ingredients that make up the "Un-coalition" nuts.


40 posted on 04/03/2003 5:42:45 PM PST by syriacus (Arnett had the word SUCKER pasted on his big forehead ... and the Iraqis knew how to use him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson