Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Shame of the Academy
NRA Institute ^ | 03/27/2003 | Chris Cox

Posted on 03/28/2003 4:56:15 PM PST by groanup

The "Academy" Must Now Share Michael Moore's Cinematic Shame

By Chris W. Cox

Executive Director

NRA Institute for Legislative Action

As the record-low television audience that sat through the latest Hollywood celebration of Hollywood knows, the Academy Award for a feature documentary film was given to Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine, a painfully pretentious work of anti-American, anti-gun, anti-NRA propaganda.

But many don't know that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences had to violate its own rules to allow Moore to compete for, much less win, an Oscar. The Academy's "Special Rules for the Documentary Award" define a documentary film "as a non-fiction motion picture," with the emphasis "on factual content." Bowling for Columbine miserably fails this practical test. It is a work of propaganda, pure and simple, riddled not with slovenly conducted research but with calculated dishonesty.

For example, Moore splices together two separate speeches by NRA President Charlton Heston to create the false impression that viewers are seeing a single speech given at the 1999 NRA Annual Meetings in Denver. Moore's intent is to make NRA's president appear insensitive to the senseless murders at Columbine High School earlier that year in nearby Littleton.

To further his lie, Moore depicts President Heston raising a musket at the Denver meeting and delivering his familiar line "from my cold dead hands." The facts—that President Heston was actually filmed one year later and 1,354 miles away in Charlotte, N.C.—aren't something Moore cares to document.

The deception continues with Moore repeatedly referring to the Denver meetings as pro-gun rallies. He fails to document the well-known fact that out of respect for the families victimized at Columbine, NRA canceled all events and meetings in Denver except those required the Association's bylaws and laws regarding not-for-profit corporations.

No lie is too poisonous for Michael Moore. He actually tries to make viewers believe that NRA makes a habit of holding rallies in the wake of tragic shootings. After failing to document that NRA's Denver meetings were scheduled years in advance, Moore jumps to a Michigan campaign rally, claiming: "just as he did after the Columbine shooting, Charlton Heston showed up in Flint, to have a big pro-gun rally." Moore wants viewers to believe the Flint rally took place immediately following the shooting death of child in a local classroom. In fact, the rally took place eight months later during the regular campaign season.

Another outrageous sequence in Moore's supposedly "non-fiction motion picture," tries to associate NRA with the Ku Kux Klan and depicts an NRA member assisting in a Klan cross burning. The rationale? NRA was founded in 1871, the year the KKK was declared an illegal organization. The absurd connection is intentional. It's Michael Moore's idea of humor.

An honest documentary would record that NRA was founded by former Union Army officers who fought a war to bring an end to slavery. It would record that Civil War veteran Maj. Gen. Ambrose Burnside was the Association's first president. It would record that the man who signed the act making the Klan an illegal organization later became NRA's eighth president—Ulysses S. Grant.

A true documentary would note that NRA's early history was written by figures who had not only fought to end slavery, but who would later oppose the persecution of freedmen. Such a man would assume command of the Fifth Military District, and he would then remove governors in Texas and Louisiana for failing to oppose the KKK. That man later became NRA's ninth president—Gen. Philip H. Sheridan.

Bowling For Columbine is a compilation of deceit piled upon deceit—facts omitted, time lines distorted and editing tricks employed to present a false view of American culture in general and the "gun culture" and NRA in particular. And yet, no matter how shameless its deceptions, no matter how brazen its lies, Moore's propaganda film does have its fans, including the Brady Campaign.

When Moore's Oscar nomination was announced, the gun-ban group was "very pleased" that "Bowling for Columbine is receiving the acclaim it deserves." The Brady bunch fell silent, however, in the days following Moore's win. Possibly they found him less appealing after his tasteless Oscar acceptance speech. Unable to resist a captive audience, the self-indulgent Moore railed against the war in Iraq and President Bush. And while his tirade was received silently by most of the Hollywood millionaires in the Kodak Theater, the poseur-populist was booed loudly by the stagehands actually working the event.

As more and more Americans catch on to the deceit that is Bowling for Columbine, its maker will have to seek out a more gullible audience. The Wall Street Journal's John Fund provides a road map: "Mr. Moore is naturally a big hit among the French. The jury at the Cannes Film Festival created a special, one-time only award to honor his film and then gave it a 13-minute standing ovation." Many Americans would gladly say, Au revoir Monsieur Moore.

More on Michael Moore's anti-gun deceit Bowling For Columbine may be found at www.nraila.org. In particular, see the article "Sliming America" and the link to "Bowling for Columbine: Documentary or Fiction?"


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndammendment; academyawards; antiamerican; antibush; antigun; boycott; boycotthollywood; charltonheston; columbine; fictionaldocumentary; fraud; gungrabbers; hollyweird; hollywoodleft; hollywoodliberals; lumpyreifenstahl; mediabias; michaelmoore; michaelmoron; mikeymoron; mockumentary; nationalrifleassoc; nra; oscar; oscars; propaganda; propagandista; redmenace; sham; socialist; theredmenace; workoffiction
Posted for discussion purposes only
1 posted on 03/28/2003 4:56:15 PM PST by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: groanup
I earlier made a joke on another thread about there now being a new genre- fact free documentaries. Seems the joke is on all of us, they actually did make a new category.
2 posted on 03/28/2003 5:03:28 PM PST by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeeperFreeper
Michael Moore can have my gun...Bullets first!


An NRA Bump!
3 posted on 03/28/2003 5:05:41 PM PST by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: groanup
A Liberty Belles Bump!
4 posted on 03/28/2003 5:06:15 PM PST by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
A Second Amendment Sisters Bump!!
5 posted on 03/28/2003 5:06:45 PM PST by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
An I loved the movie "The Patriot" Bump!
6 posted on 03/28/2003 5:07:35 PM PST by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
A well armed Militia Bump!
7 posted on 03/28/2003 5:08:12 PM PST by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Moore is a 330lb bag of ...excrement. Get another bag for the academy-of-dimwits.
8 posted on 03/28/2003 5:09:47 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Truth to a Liberal, is like a crucifix to a vampire.
9 posted on 03/28/2003 5:11:30 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY (((Anti-Antiwar DemonTraitor)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
The problem is that Europeans don't understand any of this. Their ONLY view is the view Moore gives them. In Europe I had to explain how Moore is a liar. (there was no polite way to cushion it) When I explained he was a communist who got his start in San Francisco writing his own communist magazine, it put things in perspective but only a little. There is no pro-second ammendment equivalent.

10 posted on 03/28/2003 5:24:21 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Lumpy Reifenstahl BUMP.
11 posted on 03/28/2003 5:38:21 PM PST by weegee (McCarthy was right, Fight the Red Menace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Anybody catch the recent Oprah in which she gave an entire hour to this moron and his crackhead "views"? I was appalled by the clip of Moore's distorted, lie-filled "history of the United States" in which he tries to explain why we supposedly want to kill everyone else in the world. This guy is a psycho, a seriously disturbed liar using film to spread his venomous Socialist pipedreams. Pathetically, most people are bereft of anything resembling a working knowledge of history, and so are easily deceived by garbage like this.

Haven't seen much here about Oprah, though. Personally, I think she's a lot more dangerous. Millions of women and kids watch her every day and are spoonfed emotionally by whatever it is she decides to present from that cushy, comfy couch in Chicago. Since critical thinking is all but dead in liberal corners, many viewers think that if it's on Oprah, it must be true.
12 posted on 03/28/2003 5:51:23 PM PST by Scothia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
Moore is a 330lb bag of ...excrement.

What's the other 120 pounds?

13 posted on 03/28/2003 5:58:43 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: groanup
and then gave it a 13-minute standing ovation

Just try to imagine a 13-minute standing ovation. Thirteen minutes is a LONG time. Either someone's lying about the reception it received, or the French are truly obsessive in their political statements, to the point of mental illness.

14 posted on 03/28/2003 6:01:27 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
I've got no problem with people having a difference of opinion. But if Moore spliced together film to create fiction and presented it as fact, he's a dirty ass liar.

Wasn't he raving on at the Academy Awards about a "fictitious" President and a "fictitious" war? Dirty bastard did the same thing he accuses others of doing.

Yet the Academy Awards gave him an Oscar for his fictitious work of "non-fiction"!!!

15 posted on 03/28/2003 7:18:59 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
BTTP
16 posted on 03/28/2003 8:14:26 PM PST by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson