Skip to comments.
Officials Believe Saddam Is in Control of Military
Fox News.Com ^
| 3/27/03
| Various/Carl Cameron
Posted on 03/28/2003 9:39:07 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
This one needed the 'finishing touch' :)
CLICK HERE
41
posted on
03/28/2003 10:44:54 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Calpernia
Weekend at Bernie's all of them (including ALOT of the leftists point of view on Buch for OIL only)
found here
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
You saw this pic, no? I can't post it directly. I think it is too big. When I size it....it doesn't show. So it is at my free geocities junk site:
CLICK HERE
43
posted on
03/28/2003 10:48:46 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Mitchell; Allan; Fred Mertz; Badabing Badaboom
I also wonder about these stories that our rush to Baghdad has had to be curtailed because of paras harassing our rear. It's interesting that everybody's forgotten about the 3,000 cruise missiles that were supposed to be raining down on Baghdad at the start of the conflict -- first that idea was postponed, now it's been quietly dropped altogether. Rear-guard action by paras can't explain that. No, it looks like the two opening moves of the campaign -- the alleged bunker bombing (we don't know if they even hit a bunker) and the lunge for Baghdad, were feints -- perhaps an attempt to see if the regime would fold quickly. But the absence of those 3,000 missiles raining on Baghdad tells you that inside-out was never the real strategy, except for public consumption. We're back to outside-in, which is my model predicted we would do, if we decided we couldn't wait. It gives Saddam something to play for, while we isolate him. A nice added touch is the obliteration of his palaces, which underline that he won't have much to go back to, even if he pulls it out. Now, since we've gone in without any real homeland defense against what he's got (perhaps the conclusion was that was never going to be feasible on any practical timescale), we are still vulnerable to his upping the ante with WMD attacks against US population centers coordinated with a seige or "Baghdadograd" street-fighting. I assume, or at least hope, that we have some pretty good intel that he plans to fold rather than take it to the brink -- perhaps evidence of money transfers, stashing of loot overseas, etc. Because, otherwise, it seems like a rather "risky scheme" we have undertaken, don't you think?
44
posted on
03/28/2003 10:51:35 AM PST
by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
LOL ! Another good one by Reg . . .
45
posted on
03/28/2003 10:53:08 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
To: Calpernia; Howlin
To: MeeknMing
Don't know who created any of them originally. Found in Political Cartoons in post 42.
To: Quix
For giggles and grins, I checked out your tag line and found you've been holding out on the pin-headed reporters. Shame on you for not sending an FYI to Rumsfeld and Franks. It clearly states right there in bold print SH isn't controlling anything and the war will end by May.
You Will Crush (shock n awe) the Guilty Saddam and the Month of Eyar (May in 2003) Will be Restful
Hussein is a Vapor. Like a Guarded Lamb, God is Keeping Jews and Levites Whole. And the Cell Inside Your Dwelling will become a Torture Chamber.
A Bush will Rush. There She (Lady Liberty) is. Provide a Complete Peace.
Conquer the Axis of Evil in the Island, or an Elephant that I Raise Will Fly.
http://www.biblecodedigest.com/page.php/151
To: mtbopfuyn
Those are the codes.
Some are shorter than I'd like to call certainly authentic beforehand.
But we shall see what comes of them!
Sure hope those about SH are correct!
The one I have the strongest feeing about is May being a restful month. Perhaps before a storm following but it would be nice if May were restful!
49
posted on
03/28/2003 11:04:01 AM PST
by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: mtbopfuyn
50
posted on
03/28/2003 11:05:30 AM PST
by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: The Great Satan
Raining missiles on Baghdad would destroy the infrastructure. I think that was only floated as psyops. Our intent the whole time was to remove the Baath Regime.
51
posted on
03/28/2003 11:06:31 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
They are funny. I kept the links for some giggles. Actually, the cartoons are even funnier when they are thrown into a discussion. Like these threads.
52
posted on
03/28/2003 11:08:00 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: mtbopfuyn
I suppose it's plausible from the code to conclude that the war would be over by May. And, I suspect it will be.
But the Code doesn't say that.
May being restful could result from a number of contingencies.
. . .
including an extended pause; lull; break in this war. Including a break between this war and WWIII.
I hope we have a longer break than May between significant wars! But I don't consider it a certainty by a long shot.
53
posted on
03/28/2003 11:08:17 AM PST
by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Oh, I see. Well, it looked like his style in the print, etc. and the real giveaway is "Registered @ aol.com" on the bottom left. :O) . . .
54
posted on
03/28/2003 11:09:40 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
To: Quix
I do not go for the bible coding stuff myself (Reading The Holy Bible is all that is needed-there is no code but that of which is self enlightment of The Holy Spirit) but you might be interested in this
thread
To: Calpernia
Raining missiles on Baghdad would destroy the infrastructure. I think that was only floated as psyops. Our intent the whole time was to remove the Baath Regime.But wouldn't it then have made more sense to advertise that? I mean, it's not like the Baathists didn't know we were out get them.
56
posted on
03/28/2003 11:10:11 AM PST
by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Understand.
Am fairly weary of arguing such a relatively minor issue as the Codes. Will eventually post some interesting things but have other priorities for now.
Certainly The Surface Text is more than sufficient to see us HOME.
Yes, have seen that thread. Thanks.
Blessings,
57
posted on
03/28/2003 11:15:49 AM PST
by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: Quix
WILL DO WHATEVER--
IF Lord willing and Creek don't rise.
58
posted on
03/28/2003 11:18:15 AM PST
by
Quix
(QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
To: The Great Satan
The propaganda of the missiles raining down + plus the initial surprise first strikes helped to increase the white flag wavers early on. Remember, everyone was expecting initial shock and awe. Our military equipment is overwhelming to the citizens/combatants. Remember the initial amount that came running? The real Republican Guard wouldn't come running that fast...but it did wonders for the citizens with guns going to jihad.
59
posted on
03/28/2003 11:18:23 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Quix
Thanks for respecting my view. Ping me when you post them, always interested in theology and the Holy Bible.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson