Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charlie Rangel D (NY) labeled U.S. Troops as 'bombers of women and children tonight on Fox
Fox News: Hannity and Colmes . ^ | 3/27/2003 | John Danforth

Posted on 03/27/2003 7:25:39 PM PST by JohnD9207

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

1. That the soldiers fighting in Iraq were bombing Women and Children!!! When confronted with this he claimed that they weren't bombing themselves!!! Sound's like the garbage we heard a few years ago when we were told that we were 'baby killers'.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 1buttpimple; hallofshame; povertypimp; rangel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last
To: JohnD9207
Don't get upset...let them hang themselves! Re-election time rolls around for ALL of them sooner or later!
41 posted on 03/27/2003 7:42:55 PM PST by Teetop (democrats....... socialist.........whats the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
How to get Charlie Rangle to support the war:

1) Listen to Charlie "senial old geezer" Rangle rant about "geniocide" in Iraq.

2) Call up the show that Charlie's on and get through the screener by pretending to be a fan of his.

3) As soon as you get on the air, solumnly "inform" Charlie that Bush just resigned and offered the Presidency to John Kerry, who accepted and will be conducting the war.

4) Listen to Charlie lecture on how we "must support the President in the time of war".

Worked with impeachment. ;-)

42 posted on 03/27/2003 7:43:17 PM PST by BillyBoy (George Ryan deserves a long term...without parole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
How can this man dare say such things?
This is bordering on sedition, and he should not get away with this.
What freaking former President has the experience to lead us in war besides Eisenhower you moron? Surely you said the same about the draft dodger from your party right? Somehow I doubt it.
Communist!!!!
43 posted on 03/27/2003 7:43:41 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
roots --- Rangel -- Hussien -- castro ... idi ammini's !

LOL! The server must have had difficulty with the HTML, the 'Leahy', 'Daschle' and 'Kennedy' were missing ;o)

44 posted on 03/27/2003 7:44:07 PM PST by 4CJ ('No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.' - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
I find it comforting to know that Charles Rangel, ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, takes the time from his busy schedule to come out and perform, gratis, for GOP commercials in next year's election cycle.

They also make it easier to "Nationalize" this next election cycle. Would you really want people like him in charge?

A huge group they will lose is the swing voter. The war, the budget, Estrada, etc. They are losing a lot in the effort to "shore up their base".

45 posted on 03/27/2003 7:44:36 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
HE SAID WE ARE BOMBING WOMEN AND CHILDREN.

I cannot believe he can get away with this.

In my view HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF SOLDIERS.

It is because of him and the peace protesters and liberal media that we have to bend over backwards and put our soldiers at increased risk to show the world we are not trying to harm civilians. He is aiding the enemy by portraying our military as baby killers from his position as a government representative.

I cannot believe what we've come to, and what these elected officials can get away with.

Sorry for the caps. I'm infuriated.
46 posted on 03/27/2003 7:44:58 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
I saw this tonight also and was totaly outraged. He was amazing in his disrespect for President Bush and our men and women in Iraq. He stated twice that we were killing innocent women and children in Iraq. I can not remember exacty how he said it because I was so totaly outraged with his entire appearance.
47 posted on 03/27/2003 7:45:12 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
This kind of tactic might work in his district, but it won't play the US public. When the war is over the Rangel plantation is going to be politicaly bankrupt and he knows it. Go ahead Charlie keep digging.
48 posted on 03/27/2003 7:45:36 PM PST by oyez (This country is too good for some people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Ruck Fangel !!


49 posted on 03/27/2003 7:45:52 PM PST by unixfox (Close the borders, problem solved !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
Failure to remove this scum from a leadership position is a stain on the Democrat Party!
50 posted on 03/27/2003 7:45:57 PM PST by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmaddox
Iraq using people as slaves...NO sir because this was explained to him...See he was using this moment to gain political points. He ignored these FACTS.

Gent's watch it on Fox lated if you doubt me...but get on-line and shut this man down.

John
51 posted on 03/27/2003 7:46:28 PM PST by JohnD9207
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
That the soldiers fighting in Iraq were bombing Women and Children!!! When confronted with this he claimed that they weren't bombing themselves!!!

And because of the accidental friendly fire incidence he could have said "the coalition soldiers fighting in Iraq are bombing each other" And when confronted with this claim that they weren't bombing themselves!!!

What a disingenuous bastard.

52 posted on 03/27/2003 7:46:39 PM PST by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
I have heard rangel on many occassions with Hannity. I disliked him because of his support for Clinton. He usually provides a valid argument, but tonight it was way to obvious what he was doing and saying. He was blatantly lying and denying what was going on over there. He has been severely exposed, and our virtues should not allow this to go unnoticed. Hannity lost all respect for him tonight.
53 posted on 03/27/2003 7:46:41 PM PST by grumple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
When asked why (as he had just asserted) his constituency fully supported his views about Iraq, he said something to the effect that "maybe they understand what it's like to be oppressed..." ????

Unbelievable. Usually he just seems like silly idiot. Tonight he got my blood boiling with his greasy sleaziness. I don't think I've ever seen Hannity quite as upset as he obviously was.

He came across as a coward that threw out politico cheap shots then hid behind his service and his elected position.

I certainly hope they quit giving him airtime.
54 posted on 03/27/2003 7:47:57 PM PST by rpierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
What I find great is that, increasingly, these evil leftists like Rangel are not being allowed to get away with it. I watched this tonight and you could tell that ol' Charlie wasn't happy to be challenged this way.

Sean did a great job of calling this old race hustler's bluff.

Bet he won't be back on this show for awhile.
55 posted on 03/27/2003 7:48:02 PM PST by x1stcav (HooAhh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
He also said something to the effect that calling this a liberation is a hard sell, or not believable.

Yep and he and Alan both made mention several times that we went into Iraq against the wishes of the Security Council and U.N., can someone please tell me the number of the SC resolution which states we will not attack Iraq.
If one came up for a vote I am sure we would have vetoed it.

56 posted on 03/27/2003 7:48:45 PM PST by LittleRedRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
The new Democratic party...... shine the light on the scum and the Republican Party wins in a landslide. They soon start eating their own. It's a beautiful thing!
57 posted on 03/27/2003 7:49:58 PM PST by Mark (Treason doeth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
I thought Sean let him off too easy. He should have challenged him and asked him this "are you calling our soldiers baby killers?"
58 posted on 03/27/2003 7:50:01 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: laz17
"I hope Sean ripped him a new one.

He did. Sean pretty much exposed him for being poorly informed about the news and current war info. Sounded to me like Rangle just regurgitated the headlines of the NY Times. Which was a good topic on O'Reilly tonight.

59 posted on 03/27/2003 7:50:22 PM PST by two23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JohnD9207
Someone needs to remind Chuck that he is a member of the US legislature, not Canada's.
60 posted on 03/27/2003 7:51:11 PM PST by gcruse (If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson