Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3rd Infantry Seizes 3 Bridges in Fiercest Fighting So Far
The New York Times ^ | March 26, 2003 | STEVEN LEE MYERS

Posted on 03/26/2003 10:45:20 AM PST by demlosers

WITH THE THIRD INFANTRY DIVISION, in Central Iraq, March 26 — The Army's 3rd Infantry Division encircled the city of Najaf early today after seizing three bridges across the Euphrates River in the division's fiercest clashes since the war began.

The fight around Najaf — which lasted more than 36 hours — has considerably slowed the division's march northwards, as have the swirling winds and sand. The storm continued relentlessly today, reducing visibility to a few hundred feet and casting an eerie burnt orange glow as the sun set.

Najaf, a city of more than 100,000 about 90 miles from Baghdad, had not been one of the division's military objectives, and commanders here said they did not intend to occupy it. But they were forced to encircle it as Iraqi forces repeatedly attacked American forces after they pushed across the escarpment to the west on Sunday.

"What I've done is surround the city and cut it off," the division's commander, Maj. Gen. Buford C. Blount 3rd, said in an interview today.

The Iraqi commander inside the city telephoned his superiors in Baghdad early today to say that he was surrounded, another American officer here said, but as many as 1,000 fighters, believed to belong to militia groups intensely loyal to Saddam Hussein, remained inside and continued to clash with United States Army soldiers arrayed around the town.

This morning and again this evening, the division's artillery batteries repeatedly struck Iraqi troops — some in tanks, most in troop transports — who tried to reinforce the city from the north and the south. Maj. Benjamin M. Matthews, artillery commander for the division's 1st Brigade, said the barrages, backed by air strikes, had destroyed more than two dozen Iraqi vehicles and killed scores of troops.

Iraq's military appears to have decided to make a stand at Najaf, though the forces fighting there are mostly militia fighters from Mr. Hussein's Baath Party and two other groups, Saddam Fedayeen and Al Quds.

General Blount said that he was surprised by the intensity of the Iraqi resistance — something that has forced changes in the Army's plans to press quickly towards the defenses of Baghdad, where Iraq's elite Republican Guard divisions are dug in.

The general added that it appeared, for now at least, that Mr. Hussein's government still maintained some control over its military.

"They're fighting fairly tenaciously," General Blount said. "They're organized, and some of them are fairly well equipped."

One soldier with the 3rd Infantry Division, a loader on a tank, was killed on Monday. Also two tanks and one Bradley fighting vehicle with the division's 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry Squadron were destroyed by anti-armored missiles. Officers here believe the missile may be a new Russian variant, known as a Cornet, purchased despite United Nations sanctions on arms sales to Iraq.

According to the division's estimates, as many as 1,000 Iraqi troops have been killed since the division swept into the scrub desert north of Najaf, essentially passing the city by. Hundreds more have been captured.

The situation inside Najaf itself — one of the holiest sites in the Shiite branch of Islam because it is the burial site of Ali, the cousin of the prophet Mohammed — remained unclear. Its population is predominantly Shiite, but the security and military forces loyal to Mr. Hussein still control it. Col. William F. Grimsley, commander of the 1st Brigade, described the city as "at least neutral and perhaps happy we're here."

General Blount said that American forces had been in contact with Shiite leaders and expected them to assume control once those loyal to Mr. Hussein, now cut off, surrender.

The battle around the city, the division's most intense in six says of fighting, began late Monday night when the 1st Brigade sent a tank company across a bridge north of the city, with the intent of blocking the main roads into it from the north. It was the first time the division's troops had crossed the Euphrates.

After three tanks passed, the Iraqis detonated explosives, buckling the bridge and cutting off the tanks. Engineers eventually made the bridge passable again, but fighting flared through the day on Tuesday.

The 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry, moving north from Samawah, captured a bridge south of the city late Tuesday, while the 1st Brigade seized another bridge north early today, effectively completing the encirclement.

The effort has distracted significant parts of the division, which had been consolidating its forces for what is expected to be a final assault on the Republican Guard divisions around Baghdad.

Despite the American foothold on the eastern side of the Euphrates, Iraqi forces continued to attack in what soldiers described as futile, almost fanatical assaults against M1-A1 tanks and Bradley armored fighting vehicles.

Cpl. Benjamin R. Richardson, who was among the engineers who went to the bridge, said he saw two civilian vehicles with armed Iraqis drive straight toward Americans. A tank drove simply over one of the vehicles without firing a shot, while a Bradley raked the other vehicle with gunfire.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3rdid; baghdaddefense; battleforbaghdad; cornet; embeddedreport; groundassault; illegalweapons; kornet; najaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: L,TOWM
Time to arm the Chechen rebels.
21 posted on 03/26/2003 11:00:21 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Officers here believe the missile may be a new Russian variant, known as a Cornet, purchased despite United Nations sanctions on arms sales to Iraq.

This needs to have greater publicity -- Russia violating UN weapons sanctions with Iraq -- blood for oil.

22 posted on 03/26/2003 11:00:23 AM PST by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Was the tank that was hit an M1A1? Is this Kornet missile able to defeat its armor? If so, ouch!
23 posted on 03/26/2003 11:00:24 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
One soldier with the 3rd Infantry Division, a loader on a tank, was killed on Monday. Also two tanks and one Bradley fighting vehicle with the division's 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry Squadron were destroyed by anti-armored missiles. Officers here believe the missile may be a new Russian variant, known as a Cornet, purchased despite United Nations sanctions on arms sales to Iraq.

Russian arms dealing during sanctions bought by funds from the oil for food program, no doubt.

24 posted on 03/26/2003 11:04:10 AM PST by TADSLOS (Sua Sponte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Is it just me, or are others also sick and tired of the adjective "fierce" being used over and over to describe all skirmishes, battles, fighting, and even sandstorms?
25 posted on 03/26/2003 11:05:07 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
The fight around Najaf — which lasted more than 36 hours — has considerably slowed the division's march northwards,

We fight them where they are, not where we expected to be.

As the saying goes, "don't fight the plan, fight the enemy."

26 posted on 03/26/2003 11:05:20 AM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Your post would certain help explain why the Russians don't want the US going to war with Iraq....we're going to be able to prove that they've been selling banned weapons. Now the only other questions are: what else did they sell? who else has been selling stuff (F'n France, of course)? how many have been sold?

Just what til the UN finds out, why, they may pass a resolution...oh my.
27 posted on 03/26/2003 11:06:06 AM PST by mad puppy (tick tock, lets go to Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
How do you spell FANATIC? "Iraqi saddam loyalist militia"
28 posted on 03/26/2003 11:07:18 AM PST by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Don't bring a truck to a tank fight.
29 posted on 03/26/2003 11:08:05 AM PST by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
...One soldier with the 3rd Infantry Division, a loader on a tank, was killed on Monday.

According to the Pentagon Briefing thats going on now, NO US personnel were killed in this engagement. NYT reporter got it wrong.

30 posted on 03/26/2003 11:08:51 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
Sortof ouch. Tanks have their vulnerabilites, even ours- some areas have more armor, some less, tracks have next to none.
31 posted on 03/26/2003 11:09:48 AM PST by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
Don't mean to insult you, but just so you know, modern tanks use armours that are composites, but are equal to so many inches of solid rolled steel like the tanks in WWII. For example, the M1A1 Rhinemettal 120mm gun can plow shot through the front turret (the most highly armoured spot) of almost any Russian built tank, with the round passing out the back of the turret. In DS 1 that same damage was done even after the shot passed through several feet of sand berms.

For everyone else out there-the claims that 2 M1A1 tanks were destroyed are generally false-they were just knocked out of action. How do I know? No crew members were killed, a catastrophic hit on a tank would kill most of the 4 person crew. I suspect these tanks will be recovered and may even reenter the conflict depending on the closeness of the DS/GS level repair shops. take care---

32 posted on 03/26/2003 11:09:50 AM PST by Tin-Legions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
ditto...arm the them. A few Javilins would be in order
33 posted on 03/26/2003 11:10:26 AM PST by madison46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
Is it just me, or are others also sick and tired of the adjective "fierce" being used over and over to describe all skirmishes, battles, fighting, and even sandstorms?

Iraqis getting their 'asses kicked' is a better description.

34 posted on 03/26/2003 11:10:57 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
The first time Turkey had rejected US troops there we should have immediately diverted the ships to Kuwait. As it is the 4th will be unloading in about a week.
35 posted on 03/26/2003 11:13:39 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk; finnman69
Aren't the Chechens Osama's pals?

The enemy of your enemy is not always your friend!

D
36 posted on 03/26/2003 11:13:55 AM PST by daviddennis (Visit amazing.com for protest accounts, video & more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: I_Stern
"A tank drove simply over one of the vehicles without firing a shot"

Mmmmmmmm...Iraqi pancakes... >>or stuffed french toast? hehehe


37 posted on 03/26/2003 11:16:15 AM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Look out--that Iraqi column we've been hearing about is coming to relieve the fedayeen in Najaf...I hope we're ready.
38 posted on 03/26/2003 11:17:18 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tin-Legions; BlueLancer
Oh, I understand the difference between Chobham/composite armor and simple steel plate. That does'nt really apply on comparing the penetration rates between shells relying on kinetic penetration (120 mm DS1 firing FSSDPU rounds) vs chemical penetration (missile/main gun HEAT warheads).

For the later, a claim of 43 inch steel plate WITH reactive armor reinforcement(!) penetration rate seems to be outside the realm of credibility for a missile HEAT warhead. (Not that it would'nt WARM on the inside of the 43 inches ;-) )

Can't talk any more...Bomb Threat in our Building (Downtown LA). Gotta Run!!!
39 posted on 03/26/2003 11:18:53 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
One soldier with the 3rd Infantry Division, a loader on a tank, was killed on Monday. Also two tanks and one Bradley fighting vehicle with the division's 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry Squadron were destroyed by anti-armored missiles. Officers here believe the missile may be a new Russian variant, known as a Cornet, purchased despite United Nations sanctions on arms sales to Iraq.

I was wondering how the Iraqis could knock out an M-1 with an RPG. They're using the Kornet anti-tank missile, which came on-line after Gulf War I. This is REALLY starting to p!ss me off!

KORNET E ANTI-ARMOUR MISSILE, RUSSIA

Kornet E is the name given to the export version of the Russian Kornet missile system. The system, first shown in 1994, has been developed by the KBP Instrument Design Making Bureau, Tula, Russia and is in production and service with the Russian Army and has been sold to the Syrian Army.

Kornet is a third generation system, developed to replace the Fagot and Konkurs missile systems in the Russian Army. It is designed to destroy tanks, including those fitted with explosive reactive armour (ERA), fortifications, entrenched troops as well as small-scale targets. The system can be fitted to a variety of tracked and wheeled vehicles, including the BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicle, as well as serving as a standalone, portable system. The self-propelled Kornet missile system is manufactured by the Volsk Mechanical Plant, Volsk, Russian Federation.

MISSILE

The launcher fires Kornet missiles with tandem shaped charge HEAT warheads to defeat tanks fitted with ERA or with high explosive/incendiary (thermobaric effect) warheads, for use against bunkers, fortifications and fire emplacements. Armour penetration for the HEAT warhead is stated to be 1200 mm. Range is 5 km.

40 posted on 03/26/2003 11:21:46 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson