Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3rd Infantry Seizes 3 Bridges in Fiercest Fighting So Far
The New York Times ^ | March 26, 2003 | STEVEN LEE MYERS

Posted on 03/26/2003 10:45:20 AM PST by demlosers

WITH THE THIRD INFANTRY DIVISION, in Central Iraq, March 26 — The Army's 3rd Infantry Division encircled the city of Najaf early today after seizing three bridges across the Euphrates River in the division's fiercest clashes since the war began.

The fight around Najaf — which lasted more than 36 hours — has considerably slowed the division's march northwards, as have the swirling winds and sand. The storm continued relentlessly today, reducing visibility to a few hundred feet and casting an eerie burnt orange glow as the sun set.

Najaf, a city of more than 100,000 about 90 miles from Baghdad, had not been one of the division's military objectives, and commanders here said they did not intend to occupy it. But they were forced to encircle it as Iraqi forces repeatedly attacked American forces after they pushed across the escarpment to the west on Sunday.

"What I've done is surround the city and cut it off," the division's commander, Maj. Gen. Buford C. Blount 3rd, said in an interview today.

The Iraqi commander inside the city telephoned his superiors in Baghdad early today to say that he was surrounded, another American officer here said, but as many as 1,000 fighters, believed to belong to militia groups intensely loyal to Saddam Hussein, remained inside and continued to clash with United States Army soldiers arrayed around the town.

This morning and again this evening, the division's artillery batteries repeatedly struck Iraqi troops — some in tanks, most in troop transports — who tried to reinforce the city from the north and the south. Maj. Benjamin M. Matthews, artillery commander for the division's 1st Brigade, said the barrages, backed by air strikes, had destroyed more than two dozen Iraqi vehicles and killed scores of troops.

Iraq's military appears to have decided to make a stand at Najaf, though the forces fighting there are mostly militia fighters from Mr. Hussein's Baath Party and two other groups, Saddam Fedayeen and Al Quds.

General Blount said that he was surprised by the intensity of the Iraqi resistance — something that has forced changes in the Army's plans to press quickly towards the defenses of Baghdad, where Iraq's elite Republican Guard divisions are dug in.

The general added that it appeared, for now at least, that Mr. Hussein's government still maintained some control over its military.

"They're fighting fairly tenaciously," General Blount said. "They're organized, and some of them are fairly well equipped."

One soldier with the 3rd Infantry Division, a loader on a tank, was killed on Monday. Also two tanks and one Bradley fighting vehicle with the division's 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry Squadron were destroyed by anti-armored missiles. Officers here believe the missile may be a new Russian variant, known as a Cornet, purchased despite United Nations sanctions on arms sales to Iraq.

According to the division's estimates, as many as 1,000 Iraqi troops have been killed since the division swept into the scrub desert north of Najaf, essentially passing the city by. Hundreds more have been captured.

The situation inside Najaf itself — one of the holiest sites in the Shiite branch of Islam because it is the burial site of Ali, the cousin of the prophet Mohammed — remained unclear. Its population is predominantly Shiite, but the security and military forces loyal to Mr. Hussein still control it. Col. William F. Grimsley, commander of the 1st Brigade, described the city as "at least neutral and perhaps happy we're here."

General Blount said that American forces had been in contact with Shiite leaders and expected them to assume control once those loyal to Mr. Hussein, now cut off, surrender.

The battle around the city, the division's most intense in six says of fighting, began late Monday night when the 1st Brigade sent a tank company across a bridge north of the city, with the intent of blocking the main roads into it from the north. It was the first time the division's troops had crossed the Euphrates.

After three tanks passed, the Iraqis detonated explosives, buckling the bridge and cutting off the tanks. Engineers eventually made the bridge passable again, but fighting flared through the day on Tuesday.

The 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry, moving north from Samawah, captured a bridge south of the city late Tuesday, while the 1st Brigade seized another bridge north early today, effectively completing the encirclement.

The effort has distracted significant parts of the division, which had been consolidating its forces for what is expected to be a final assault on the Republican Guard divisions around Baghdad.

Despite the American foothold on the eastern side of the Euphrates, Iraqi forces continued to attack in what soldiers described as futile, almost fanatical assaults against M1-A1 tanks and Bradley armored fighting vehicles.

Cpl. Benjamin R. Richardson, who was among the engineers who went to the bridge, said he saw two civilian vehicles with armed Iraqis drive straight toward Americans. A tank drove simply over one of the vehicles without firing a shot, while a Bradley raked the other vehicle with gunfire.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3rdid; baghdaddefense; battleforbaghdad; cornet; embeddedreport; groundassault; illegalweapons; kornet; najaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2003 10:45:20 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers
A tank drove simply over one of the vehicles without firing a shot

OUCH.

2 posted on 03/26/2003 10:49:12 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
"A tank drove simply over one of the vehicles without firing a shot"

Mmmmmmmm...Iraqi pancakes...
3 posted on 03/26/2003 10:49:30 AM PST by I_Stern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Dead Enders fighting on in delaying tactics.

Part of Iraqi strategy as figured we'd have to bypass towns in the Baghdad push and are using irregulars to harass our supply line and draw away resources.

Seems if we had cut bait in Turkey earlier we'd have plenty of follow up troops to secure our flanks and lines and clean up these irregulars.

4 posted on 03/26/2003 10:50:17 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
A tank drove simply over one of the vehicles without firing a shot,

Also known as "beercanning" the vehicle.

while a Bradley raked the other vehicle with gunfire.

For sale: Toyota pickup truck. Needs new engine, suspension, and extensive body work...also needs remains of previous driver and passenger hosed out of the cab. Make offer.

5 posted on 03/26/2003 10:51:29 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
One soldier with the 3rd Infantry Division, a loader on a tank, was killed on Monday. Also two tanks and one Bradley fighting vehicle with the division's 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry Squadron were destroyed by anti-armored missiles. Officers here believe the missile may be a new Russian variant, known as a Cornet, purchased despite United Nations sanctions on arms sales to Iraq.
6 posted on 03/26/2003 10:51:55 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Stern; hchutch
The new Toyota Corrie pickup truck :o)
7 posted on 03/26/2003 10:52:01 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Wow. The Iraqis are mind-numbingly incompetent. Why they didn't blow up every bridge on the Euphrates is sheer stupidity. True, we could have constructed pontoons, but that would be delayed us and left us vulnerable. The thrusts of this armored divisions are textbook Blitzkrieg operations. For example, no one analyzing the German invasion of France in 1940 criticized the planners for leaving the Maginot Line untouched. The UK media announcers and commentators are far more educated on miltary doctrine than our own and have made this point.
8 posted on 03/26/2003 10:52:31 AM PST by Mister Magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
ROFL!
9 posted on 03/26/2003 10:52:51 AM PST by seams2me ("if they pass the reading test, it means they learned to read" GWB 1/8/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
One soldier with the 3rd Infantry Division, a loader on a tank, was killed on Monday. Also two tanks and one Bradley fighting vehicle with the division's 3rd Regiment, 7th Cavalry Squadron were destroyed by anti-armored missiles. Officers here believe the missile may be a new Russian variant, known as a Cornet, purchased despite United Nations sanctions on arms sales to Iraq.

first reference I have seen to anti-tank missiles.

Kornet (AT-14)

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/at-14.htm

In October 1994, the KPB Instrument Design Bureau introduced the Kornet (AT-14) ATGM system. The Kornet was developed introducing a laser beam-riding missile with automatic command-to-line of sight (SACLOS) guidance. The operator simply has to keep the sight on the target to ensure a hit. The laser beam-riding system is also less vulnerable to countermeasures. The Kornet was specifically designed to replace the Konkurs, which has been in service with the former Soviet and Russian armies for over twenty years.

The Kornet, which has a claimed ability to penetrate 1100 to 1200 millimeters of steel armor protected by explosive armor, provided a formidable antitank weapon system. However, even with the improved capabilities the Kornet has over earlier systems, an ATGM with all-weather, day or night, immunity to countermeasures, and fire and forget capabilities was still highly desired.

10 posted on 03/26/2003 10:54:06 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
You are sooooooo bad! LMCO
11 posted on 03/26/2003 10:54:17 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
That was when the report was filed. We're now a lot closer to Baghdad. Look at at the date of the report.
12 posted on 03/26/2003 10:54:26 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
LOL!

What is the lesson learned here?
13 posted on 03/26/2003 10:54:31 AM PST by hchutch ("But tonight we get EVEN!" - Ice-T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mister Magoo
It seems we're killing a hundred Iraqis per one of our own, yet the media makes it sound like we're losing or tied. By my simple calculations they will run out of soldiers before us.
14 posted on 03/26/2003 10:54:51 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I_Stern
Flatbread--what a pita?
15 posted on 03/26/2003 10:55:01 AM PST by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
A tank drove simply over one of the vehicles without firing a shot, while a Bradley raked the other vehicle with gunfire.""

I wonder what that pickup is worth on the Iraqi scrap iron market.

16 posted on 03/26/2003 10:56:11 AM PST by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Magoo
They are beyond incompetent. I call it stupid.
17 posted on 03/26/2003 10:56:16 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
>>>>which has a claimed ability to penetrate 1100 to 1200 millimeters of steel armor protected by explosive armor<<<<<

1100 mm of armor, works out to 43 inches and change (at 25.4 mm per inch). I sense some serious POO or Putin in the air here...
18 posted on 03/26/2003 10:57:46 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
Maybe you can sell it to Rachel Corrie's family :o)
19 posted on 03/26/2003 10:57:59 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
So, the Russians violated UN sanctions and are supplying the Iraqis with new, prohibited weapons.

Time to start arming the Chechen rebels.
20 posted on 03/26/2003 10:59:45 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson