Doubtful..
1 posted on
03/26/2003 5:06:19 AM PST by
ewing
To: ewing
If true, this sounds more like a clean-up crew. The only way this ends is with Saddam and his goons heads on a spike.
To: ewing
on its way to Baghdad for negioations with the Iraq Government We would be nuts to send US nationals into Baghdad, unless they were accompanied by 500 M1 Abrams.
To: ewing
If this is true we better not start this peace talks with a cease fire
It should be talk while the war still goes on
8 posted on
03/26/2003 5:21:23 AM PST by
uncbob
( building tomorrow)
To: ewing
Agree that it is doubtful.
But, if Saddam is dead or near death, it explains a lot. All the orders to destroy oil wells and the terminals were either never issued or were not followed. If they were not followed, then it says that Saddam is no longer feared which means he is either dead or incapaciatated. If they were never issued, then he is dead or incapacitated.
There have been a lot of unused weapons, like antiship missiles from the USSR, never used and captured intact. That says command and control are non-existant. Any Iraqi military man will not operate independently without orders. Get killed that way. There are a lot of signd that Saddam is out of the picture.
14 posted on
03/26/2003 6:49:01 AM PST by
KeyWest
To: ewing
Yep. Knowing Al Jazerra, it's the US who wants the ceasefire, not Saddam.
16 posted on
03/26/2003 9:50:31 AM PST by
rintense
(The tyrant will soon be gone... or extremely dead.)
To: ewing
Where is the B. S. Meter when you need it.
To: ewing
Winners don't call time outs. Losers do.
22 posted on
03/26/2003 9:59:04 AM PST by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
To: ewing
We'll know they're serious if the Iraqi's bring 6 hat boxes with the heads of Saddam, his sons, and brothers.
24 posted on
03/26/2003 10:03:47 AM PST by
theDentist
(So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
To: ewing
Don't know why the Admin Mods locked
the other thread...it had more info in the body of the post that is discredited on another FR thread...the original report states:
A diplomatic source told Alittihad that the US government delegation included four leading members of Congress as well as Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the US Vice President Dick Cheney, representing the US Department of State, where she works as an Assistant to the Deputy of the Secretary of State for Middle Eastern Affairs.
That story is debunked on the following thread...
Vice President Richard B. Cheney's daughter is not going to be a human shield in Baghdad. "Neither daughter even has plans to travel to that region, let alone Iraq," a Cheney spokesman told United Press International.Cheney's daughters not going to Baghdad
To: ewing
Why send a delegation when our terms are unconditional surrender?
29 posted on
03/26/2003 10:17:52 AM PST by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: ewing
negioations with the Iraq Government about an immmediate ceasefire "Ceasefire", my ass, nothing but "unconditional surrender" is acceptable.
To: ewing
Great - now starts the 17 years of negotiations with the people who invented horse trading.
35 posted on
03/26/2003 11:28:03 AM PST by
Let's Roll
(And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
To: ewing
Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the US Vice President Dick CheneyOh you bet.
The Vice president of the US is going to serve his daughter up to Saddam.
Can it get much loonier. Come on Freepers, read these things before posting.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson