Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Jazeera causes outcry with broadcast of battle casualties
The Guardian (England) ^ | March 24, 2003 | Brian Whitaker

Posted on 03/23/2003 8:18:27 PM PST by liberallarry

Al-Jazeera, the Arab satellite channel which angered the United States with its coverage of the Afghan war, has caused a new furore by broadcasting blood-and-guts images from the invasion of Iraq.

Millions of viewers throughout the Middle East saw pictures of Iraqi and American victims at the weekend that many western news organisations would consider too shocking to publish.

One showed the head of a child, aged about 12, that had been split apart, reportedly in the US-led assault on Basra. Others came from northern Iraq, where American missiles targeted the Kurdish Islamist Ansar al-Islam organisation.

Yesterday, al-Jazeera relayed footage of Iraqi television's interviews with five captured American soldiers, which the US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, denounced as a breach of the Geneva convention. But the channel was unrepentant last night. "Look who's talking about international law and regulations," said al-Jazeera spokesman, Jihad Ballout. "We didn't make the pictures - the pictures are there," he continued. "It's a facet of the war. Our duty is to show the war from all angles."

During the 1991 Gulf war viewers in the Middle East relied on CNN and other western outlets for breaking news. But since its launch in 1996, al-Jazeera's coverage has made it the most watched Arab channel. It made its name in the west during the war in Afghanistan and looks set to repeat this achievement in Iraq.

Al-Jazeera is owned by the government of Qatar, which is cooperating with the US in the invasion of Iraq, but staff insist it has full editorial freedom.

The station, whose main studio in the Qatari capital, Doha, is a few minutes' drive from General Tommy Franks's Centcom headquarters, was accused of irresponsibility during the Afghan war for broadcasting taped messages from Osama bin Laden.

But as the only television station with a permanent base in Kabul, it also became a source of exclusive footage that other channels around the world were eager to buy.

Its office in Kabul was destroyed by American "smart" bombs two hours before the Northern Alliance took over the city, and many suspect the attack was no accident.

In Iraq, al-Jazeera is taking no chances. In the hope that its Baghdad office will not be mistaken for an Iraqi command-and-control centre, it has supplied the Americans with the geographical coordinates of its office and the code of its signal to the satellite transponder.

Al-Jazeera has seven reporters and a back-up team of 20 working independently in Iraq, plus others "embedded" with the US and British forces.

Before the war, executives predicted that their team would have an advantage over western journalists because of their familiarity with Iraq and fluency in Arabic.

Yesterday, the channel broadcast a lengthy interview with an Iraqi general in Basra denying that US and British forces had taken the city, and also filmed the search in Baghdad for two western pilots who had allegedly baled out over the city.

"Our success is a factor of our people's networking in Iraq, and their ability to anticipate events through contacts on the ground," Mr Ballout said yesterday.

To some, this simply turns the channel into a mouthpiece for Iraqi propaganda. Yesterday's pictures of American corpses could affect western morale - a re-run of the "bodybag syndrome" that was a major factor in Vietnam - while images of Iraqi victims will fuel anti-war protests.

But others say western TV coverage is far too sanitised.

The South African columnist Darrel Bristow-Bovey yesterday complained that the influence of reality TV made war reporting look like "Big Brother Iraq".


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: televisedwar; warcoverage

1 posted on 03/23/2003 8:18:27 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Al Jazeeera needs to have a Tomahawk directed at their transmitter in Bagdad.
2 posted on 03/23/2003 8:21:36 PM PST by willgetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Al-Jazeera has seven reporters and a back-up team of 20 working independently in Iraq, plus others "embedded" with the US and British forces.

Hey, President Bush . . . If you want my unconditional support for this war in Iraq, WHAT THE F#CK ARE YOU DOING ALLOWING AL-JAZEERA REPORTERS TO BE EMBEDDED WITH OUR TROOPS?

Gosh -- We may as well put a Muslim soldier in charge of the hand grenage storage facility.

3 posted on 03/23/2003 8:23:03 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Al-Jazeera has some embedded reporters with our military? Whose bright idea was that?
4 posted on 03/23/2003 8:25:05 PM PST by skr (The Butcher of Baghdad is a WMD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willgetsome
My very thought - we keep having all these friendly fire incidents. Patriot hitting the Brit plane, 2 Brit choppers colliding - can't something just fall off an Apache when it just happens to be over their tower?
5 posted on 03/23/2003 8:26:25 PM PST by Let's Roll (Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Brought to you in the spirit of DIVERSITY from The Religion of Peace. *GAG*

6 posted on 03/23/2003 8:27:42 PM PST by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"WIPE THEM OUT...ALL OF THEM"
that's it...al Jazeeera...the Jihadists are there and
Saddam is with them....
7 posted on 03/23/2003 8:28:00 PM PST by Senator_Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
In Iraq, al-Jazeera is taking no chances. In the hope that its Baghdad office will not be mistaken for an Iraqi command-and-control centre, it has supplied the Americans with the geographical coordinates of its office and the code of its signal to the satellite transponder.

It's a war. Codes get lost; coordinates get mixed up. $#!% happens!

8 posted on 03/23/2003 8:28:21 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Hmmmm. Do you guys thing Al Jazeeera has an agenda here? LOL.
9 posted on 03/23/2003 8:29:51 PM PST by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I didn't know that!

Yes, what the hell are we doing allowing enemy reporters to be embedded with our troops?

That would be the same as having Axis Salley and Tokyo Rose riding along with our troops in WWII.

Next we will be hearing that Jane Fonda is riding along with the 1st Marines and Babs is writing stories from inside the Pentagon!

What a bunch of crap!



10 posted on 03/23/2003 8:36:16 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson