Skip to comments.
1998 LOTT CRITICISM OF CLINTON -- The Rest of the Story
several sources
| 3-22-03
| dfu
Posted on 03/22/2003 7:18:21 PM PST by doug from upland
Charley Rangel, a senior member of Congress and, Lord help us, a committee chairman if the RATS ever get back into power, has made it clear that he "supports the troops" but not the president. The greatest anger and hatred for our president comes from Rangel's fellow members of the American-hating Black Caucus.
Defenders of Rangel will cite that Trent Lott, our weak-kneed former Senate Leader, was critical of Bill Clinton when he was dropping missiles on Iraq in 1998.
For those who forgot, the missiles were dropped on the eve of impeachment. Lott opposed the air assault on suspected Iraqi chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons sites (i.e. an aspirin factory), because he thought the attacks were ineffective. It was not enough action against Hussein.
And now for what the left wants everyone to really forget. For months Lott had criticized the Clinton administration for failing to take more aggressive steps to topple Saddam Hussein. Under pressure from Congress, Clinton enacted the Iraq Liberation Act in October, 1998, which earmarked $8 million to support Iraqi political opposition. In a letter to Clinton, the Senate Republicans complained that he had only spent $58,000 of that money.
I will support serious and sustained action but will oppose action that does not accomplish our larger strategic goal, Lott said.
There is the rest of the story. We now have troops on the ground in harm's way. The America and Bush haters are out in the street. Like Ellen RATner, they want the war to go badly. The Rangel refusal to support the president and the Lott criticism are only equivalent in the Bizarro world of the political left.
Thank goodness we have a commander in chief who doesn't loathe the military, who understands the nature of evil, who doesn't want to lower our strength and submit to the U.N., who does not have an intern service him under the desk while on the phone discussing the lives of servicemen, who doesn't try to use the Sailors and Soldiers Civil Relief Act to avoid facing a sexual harassment trial, and who is loved and respected by those in the military.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: impeached; lowlife; monica; rapist; scumbag; sinkmaster; staineddress; stilldoingharm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: doug from upland
I heard Rangel interviewed on radio today in the midst of the New York City protest. I found his comments despicable.
2
posted on
03/22/2003 7:39:44 PM PST
by
Faith
To: doug from upland
I will remmeber that when some 50 yr old hippy I work with opens his big fat mouth one more time about "All about oil" crap he thinks is new.
Im not supposed to hate people, but im damn close to it with this guy....
3
posted on
03/22/2003 7:39:44 PM PST
by
smith288
(Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
To: doug from upland
"
Under pressure from Congress, Clinton enacted the Iraq Liberation Act in October, 1998, which earmarked $8 million to support Iraqi political opposition. In a letter to Clinton, the Senate Republicans complained that he had only spent $58,000 of that money." $58K for Clinton's efforts to remove his Impeachment from the news. Pretty cheap marketing.
4
posted on
03/22/2003 7:45:00 PM PST
by
harpo11
(Godspeed Brave USA Troops! My Families Thoughts and Prayers are Being Sent to YOU!)
To: smith288
Can you spell disingenuous?
5
posted on
03/22/2003 7:46:40 PM PST
by
Huber
(Sunlight is the best disinfectant)
To: doug from upland
Charlie Rangle is a pimp.
6
posted on
03/22/2003 7:49:54 PM PST
by
DD938
(God Bless America & Great Britian ( an old Navy veteran))
To: smith288
re: all about oil
Operation
Iraqi
Liberation
If it were about oil, we would take over Canada and Mexico. If it were about oil, we would have marched to Baghdad in Gulf I and taken their oil. If it were about oil, we would have stayed in Kuwait and taken their oil. If it were about oil, we would have removed the sanctions.
7
posted on
03/22/2003 7:55:03 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Protestors file Chapter 13 -- they are morally bankrupt)
To: doug from upland
i hope Rangel continue to open his mouth,destroying what is left of the democratic party.
and mr.Lott was right about iraq back then and now.
To: doug from upland
Operation
Iraqi
Liberation
It IS about oil!!! LOL!
To be technical, OIF.... But I think the MIL should have used yours
9
posted on
03/22/2003 7:58:46 PM PST
by
smith288
(Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
To: doug from upland
Trent Lott's a racist. He's been condemned and shunned by Free Republic.
I'm surprised you'd quote a man who is so despised here, since he, and he alone, was responsible for Clinton not being convicted in his impeachment trial.</sarcasm.
10
posted on
03/22/2003 7:59:39 PM PST
by
sinkspur
To: smith288
I can't take credit. Operation Iraqi Liberation comes from another FReeper.
11
posted on
03/22/2003 8:00:18 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Protestors file Chapter 13 -- they are morally bankrupt)
To: sinkspur
Trent Lott had the votes in committee to call witnesses. He caved. Maybe the RATS would have never convicted anyway, but America needed to see Juanita Broaddrick and others on live TV in front of the Senate. Had they done that and people everywhere understood he was a rapist, he might still not have been convicted, but maybe he would have gone away. He is still doing damage. Yes, that was Lott's decision so I blame him.
I don't think he is a racist. I think he is spineless.
12
posted on
03/22/2003 8:03:13 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Protestors file Chapter 13 -- they are morally bankrupt)
To: sinkspur
By the way, I quoted Lott because I have recently heard RATS comparing his criticism of Clinton to the despicable criticism of Rangel. They are not the same.
13
posted on
03/22/2003 8:04:48 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Protestors file Chapter 13 -- they are morally bankrupt)
To: doug from upland
America needed to see Juanita Broaddrick and others on live TV in front of the Senate. Yea. A screaming Monica Lewinski, mewling over how horrible the Republicans are to be persecuting her, would have had a hell of an impact on the American public.
It would not have been a good thing. In addition, nobody knows if Juanita Broddrick would have consented to be grilled by Greg Craig and company on national television.
Lott was gauging the politics of the situation, and I think he gauged it correctly.
But, hey. I know my opinion is in the minority around here, and that Trent Lott is hated almost as much as Clinton is.
The treatment of Trent Lott after his unremarkable remarks at Strom Thurmond's party by Free Republic was one of the most shameful things I've ever seen and made me embarrasssed to be associated with this site.
I've gotten over it, but I'll never forget it.
14
posted on
03/22/2003 8:09:52 PM PST
by
sinkspur
To: Huber
No, but the use of the term "outsourcing" is misleading. What the article describes is "international outsourcing" or "offshoring". Outsourcing in its purely domestic form is simply an issue of core competencies, risk management and ability to manage an extended enterprise. When you take it internationally you do potentially open up a can of worms, the long term consequence of which remain theoretical and are not yet fully understood.
Of course, the best strategy to retain domestic productive capacity is to offshore the NEA in its entirety!
15
posted on
03/22/2003 8:10:55 PM PST
by
Huber
(Sunlight is the best disinfectant)
To: doug from upland
dmac: no need to explain yourself to sinkspur; it won't do no good no how...
16
posted on
03/22/2003 8:15:39 PM PST
by
yooper
To: Huber
Sorry to all - cursor slip. Please ignore last post on this!
17
posted on
03/22/2003 8:15:50 PM PST
by
Huber
(Sunlight is the best disinfectant)
To: sinkspur
Why don't you stick to the topic at hand and stop trying to incite discord about past democrat scandal. We're at war. I actually read a few posts of yours last night without getting pissed; revisit them and take one for the team until this is all over. Then you can go back to your former ways and we can all have fun again....
18
posted on
03/22/2003 8:19:51 PM PST
by
yooper
To: yooper
Why don't you stick to the topic at hand and stop trying to incite discord about past democrat scandal. The thread is about Trent Lott. I didn't bring up "democrat scandal." The originator of this thread did.
We're at war.
There are plenty of threads about the war. If you want to talk about the war, go to one of those.
I'm not your kid; don't give me orders.
19
posted on
03/22/2003 8:25:43 PM PST
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
No, I didn't want Monica up there screaming about the evil Republicans. I wanted his victims up there. I wanted Kathleen Willey to talk about how he assaulted her in the White House and that the lives of her kids were threatened a week before her testimony in the Jones case. I would have liked to see Sally Perdue testify about how a shotgun shell was left on her car's front seat and how a thug threatened to break her legs. I would have like to hear Gennifer Flowers talk about threats against her and the break in of her house. Those would have been somewhat interesting.
20
posted on
03/22/2003 8:25:52 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Protestors file Chapter 13 -- they are morally bankrupt)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson