Skip to comments.
Bush to Address Nation Tonight
MSNBC
Posted on 03/17/2003 7:14:16 AM PST by WxMan2000
Accoring to Ari at the morning gaggle...
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: endgameapproaches
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: WxMan2000
Powell to speak at 10:45 AM...
To: WxMan2000
Set for 8PM EST... From the Oval Office?????
22
posted on
03/17/2003 7:19:28 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
(** UNDER GOD **)
To: WxMan2000
My recollection is that these presidential speeches tend to follow, not precede, the beginning of military action. Saddam better run now -- instead of weeks and months, it is now minutes and hours.
23
posted on
03/17/2003 7:19:29 AM PST
by
kesg
To: WxMan2000
Admins better get their act together on this site. I posted a thread about the vote. It was pulled. The second thread about the subject was locked quoting that it was a duplicate of my thread.
GET IT TOGETHER
To: WxMan2000
The President to tell Saddam, in his speech - leave Iraq, or face war. (Per FoxTV)
25
posted on
03/17/2003 7:20:20 AM PST
by
veronica
To: kesg
To paraphrase another Freeper (?)......... Boogity, Boogity, Boogity
26
posted on
03/17/2003 7:20:34 AM PST
by
umgud
(War determines who is left, not who is right)
To: WxMan2000
Will the major networks run tape delays?????
27
posted on
03/17/2003 7:21:00 AM PST
by
cynicom
To: WxMan2000
President: Ladies and Gentlemen of this wonderful United States of America, and to Mr Saddam Hussein in Baghdad. tonight I would like to quote "The Great Communicator" Ronald Reagan: The Bombing starts in 5 minutes.
<<===||
<<===||
<<===||
<<===||
<<===||
Baghdad
28
posted on
03/17/2003 7:21:02 AM PST
by
Johnny Gage
(We will not tire, We will not falter, We will not fail. - President George W. Bush)
To: JennysCool
You think the networks will carry this one? The incentive to carry these grows less as cries of "wolf" inure the network choosers.
29
posted on
03/17/2003 7:21:09 AM PST
by
arthurus
To: WxMan2000
I agree, no more than 24 hours. I picked 1:00 AM Baghdad time on the 19th for a particular reason.
30
posted on
03/17/2003 7:21:27 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(Hillary: Constitutional Scholar! NOT)
To: kesg
From what I understand, there will probably be two speeches--the first to warn everyone to get out, the second to say we've begun the liberation of Iraq.
31
posted on
03/17/2003 7:21:38 AM PST
by
twigs
To: veronica
Yeah, what's up with that?
32
posted on
03/17/2003 7:21:47 AM PST
by
July 4th
To: WxMan2000
One Presidential address to say negotiations and diplomacy are over and war will be necessary. Then we'll have another address later in the week to announce that the bombing has started.
33
posted on
03/17/2003 7:21:56 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: ErnBatavia
Perhaps we will strike Iraq and North Korea and maybe even France at the same time here.
34
posted on
03/17/2003 7:22:11 AM PST
by
arthurus
To: WxMan2000
Bush to Address U.S., Demand Saddam Leave
Mon March 17, 2003 10:18 AM ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush will demand in a speech to the American people on
Monday night that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein leave Iraq to avoid war, a White House
spokesman said.
Bush will speak at 8 p.m. after the failure by the U.N. Security Council to reach a consensus on
how to deal with Iraq.
To: RummyChick
Darn, I was looking for the "vote" thread!
sw
36
posted on
03/17/2003 7:22:23 AM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife (EAGLES UP!))
To: RummyChick
That's a little harsh, isn't it? Give them a break. This isn't life or death, and things that are broken can be fixed.
37
posted on
03/17/2003 7:22:43 AM PST
by
michaelt
To: RummyChick
I alerted the admins that you beat the other post by a minute. I have no idea why they destroyed your scoop.
To: veronica
"The President to tell Saddam, in his speech - leave Iraq, or face war."
Good. That's as it should be. Make him be the trigger.
39
posted on
03/17/2003 7:23:04 AM PST
by
Cap Huff
To: Jmouse007
France is to blame
That is so clear. There needs to be a good editorial written that demonstrates that.
1. To force a dangerous dictator to change his ways, he MUST sense a real danger of retaliation.
2. If he does not see unity in the potential parties to that retaliation, then he will NOT change immediately.
3. If he senses open division in the potential parties to that retaliation, the he probably will consider not changing EVER.
4. If he senses that some of the parties of the retaliation are actively preventing any retaliation EVER happening, then he will DECIDE never to change.
5. If he senses that some of the parties are his allies, then he will ignore the opposition and return to his dangerous ways.
40
posted on
03/17/2003 7:23:14 AM PST
by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson