Hang on a minute Dominique, and we'll send you all the intel we have, so you can share it with your buddy Saddam.
1 posted on
03/16/2003 11:51:42 PM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
It doesn't matter de Shemale! 1441 was about DISARMAMENT. Immediate, unconditional DISARMAMENT, with serious consequences on failure. What, is Bill Clinton reduced to writing French dictionaries so they can argue over his twisted meanings of basic terms and principles?
2 posted on
03/16/2003 11:59:05 PM PST by
Steven W.
France wouldn't notice a military knocking on its back door if it were happening.....wait, that did happen. heh heh
3 posted on
03/16/2003 11:59:33 PM PST by
GOPyouth
To: kattracks
Dominique has three problems: he can't see his hand in front of his face, he is only "worried" about the USA/French relationship (think AMF), and he considers this a "spat". Life in France must be an exercise in denial 24/7!
To: kattracks
Dominique,you have played your cards, now Blair and Bush are going to play theirs. You lose.
5 posted on
03/17/2003 12:02:11 AM PST by
bybybill
(first the public employees, next the fish and, finally, the children)
To: kattracks
Oy vey! Dominique de Villepin and his master can afford to be so dismissive since their country wasn't attacked on 9-11. Ours was. Monsieur de Villepin seems to have already forgotten Saddam's fingerprints on the first World Trade Center bombing back in 1993 and he overlooks the evidence of terrorist ties at Salman Pak. Whether Iraq had a connection with Al Qaeda is beside the point; what IS indisputable is Iraq's being the host to and giving assistance to hundreds of terrorist factions in the Middle East and around the planet. De Villepin thinks Saddam will never attack France; the truth is he hasn't had a chance to yet.
To: kattracks
France's Villepin sees no Iraq-al Qaeda linkSomeone buy him a clue please.
7 posted on
03/17/2003 12:17:10 AM PST by
Mark17
To: kattracks
Now I know why I failed French in High School...
I wasn't a slack-jawed, cheese-eating, surrender monkey!!!
8 posted on
03/17/2003 12:24:37 AM PST by
Nitro
To: kattracks
Isn't it interesting that the French are unconcerned about terrorist attacks....
Wonder why?
Proves the old wisdom.... The friend of my enemy, is my enemy.
Semper Fi
9 posted on
03/17/2003 12:27:12 AM PST by
river rat
(War works.....It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
To: kattracks
Dominique!
"L'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace." or expedient denial.
![](http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/5463/Felix/felix007.gif)
10 posted on
03/17/2003 12:30:45 AM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: kattracks
No link between Iraq and al Qaeda? One way to find out will be to search the Iraqi intelligence service archives in the ruins of their headquarters Baghdad. In fact, there could be all kinds of interesting things there contracts for the purchase of embargoed military equipment, contracts for the purchase of dual use chemicals and bio agents from certain countries with extensive trading ties with Iraq.
I think it's time to go to Baghdad and make sure.
BTW, who really mailed the Anthrax to that Suebian Troll Daschle? I KNOW the FBI profilers said it wasnt from anyone from the Middle East because of the handwriting and grammar etc. But then these are the same guys who said Muhammad and Malvo were a lone white male. They seem to have some kind of fixation with lone white males.
To: kattracks
![](http://www.chessbase.com/columns/migpics/pics-hear-see-speak-no-evil.jpg)
Le French Friends of Saddam
To: kattracks
France's Villepin sees no Iraq-French link, either. Conveniently.
17 posted on
03/17/2003 1:06:04 AM PST by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: kattracks
and worried about the future of U.S.-French relations because of the spat over Iraq WHAT relations?
18 posted on
03/17/2003 3:19:10 AM PST by
laz17
(Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
To: kattracks
This will bring her up to speed:
19 posted on
03/17/2003 4:16:02 AM PST by
backhoe
(North Korean Nukes, Hamas, OBL, 9-11... that was some "legacy" Clinton left us...)
To: kattracks
I look at it this way: the US doesn't have to "prove", particularly not to the stupid French, that Iraq had a hand in 9/11. The world is not a "court of law" like the one that tried OJ Simpson, where clever Clintonian arguments and deception can hide the truth. There is sufficient circumstancial evidence that Iraq DID have a hand in 9/11 IMHO - Aznar just recently said that HE was convinced.
Given Saddam's WMD and circumstancial evidence, the US smashing Iraq will be a great object lesson to any country that wants to mess with US, whether or not Iraq was the principal instigator of 9/11. If there is another country that had a hand in 9/11, well, everything one step at a time -- they can be next.
20 posted on
03/17/2003 4:34:44 AM PST by
chilepepper
(Gnocchi Seuton!)
To: kattracks
"France's Villepin sees no Iraq-al Qaeda link"
My thoughts about this guy is, how could he see a link, the best view he has is that of his own colon.
21 posted on
03/17/2003 4:46:13 AM PST by
SERE_DOC
(Murphy's rules for combat #14 The equipment you are using was made by the lowest bidder!)
To: kattracks
PARIS, March 17 (Reuters) - French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said on Monday that the United States had failed to prove a link between Iraq and the al Qaeda network blamed for the September 11 attacks on the United States. And Dominique has failed to prove that France does not have financial interest in Iraq that weighs into their decisions at the UN level. Dominique, did you ever hear the term 'conflict of interest?'
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson