Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada Urges France to Reconsider U.N. Veto Threat
Reuters, Yahoo news ^ | March 13, 2003 | David Ljunggren

Posted on 03/13/2003 4:43:35 AM PST by prairiebreeze

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada urged France on Wednesday to reconsider its threat to veto any U.N. resolution that authorizes the use of force against Iraq (news - web sites), saying Paris should instead consider a Canadian initiative to bridge the deep splits between Security Council members.

Ottawa put forward a proposal on Tuesday under which Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) would be given a three-week deadline for Baghdad to comply with U.N. demands to disarm or face the possibility of war.

Foreign Minister Bill Graham said this could avoid a war by making it clear to Saddam that Iraq would not be invaded if he fulfilled the demands being made upon him.

The six swing votes on the Security Council -- Chile, Mexico, Pakistan, Cameroon, Guinea and Angola -- back the proposal but it could still founder on opposition from France, which made clear on Monday that it would use its veto to block a resolution authorizing war.

Washington and its allies aim to present such a resolution to the Security Council in the very near future. If France did cast a veto, it is widely expected the United States would then decide to attack Iraq.

Graham told reporters during a conference call that he "wouldn't abandon hope yet" since he felt France might take into consideration the views of the swing voters.

"I'm not saying the French aren't showing enough flexibility but I'm saying that we would certainly be urging on France to consider this proposal as the way which is more likely to achieve solving this, without the use of force, than the Council turning everything down automatically," he said.

"I don't think anyone today is in a euphoric state. We are certainly realistic in recognizing that there are some very serious challenges to what we're trying to achieve. But on the balance side of the equation, there are a lot of countries that are looking for a similar solution."

Prime Minister Jean Chretien and Graham have been working the phones constantly in a bid to gain backing for Ottawa's proposal, especially from the six swing voters, who Graham said could help find a solution.

"Our view is that the undecided six could play a role here if they choose to do so and that's been the purpose of the prime minister's calls," he said.

Chretien, who told reporters that he had spoken to British Prime Minister Tony Blair (news - web sites) on Wednesday, said he could not predict what the fate of the Canadian proposal would be.

"We are working to prevent a war, not to have a war. If Saddam doesn't disarm there will be war. There's no doubt about that," he said.

Although the United States, Britain, Spain and Bulgaria are working to amend their resolution authorizing the use of force against Iraq, Spain said the document might be withdrawn because of a likely veto by France.

Graham played down this idea, saying "While, as a tactic, that might have been possible some weeks ago, I have a lot of difficulty believing it would be done tomorrow".

He said the chances of getting the nine votes needed to pass any resolution at the Security Council "become greater the closer one comes to having a resolution which reflects the concerns of parties not to automatically go to war but rather give Saddam Hussein a chance to respond".


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; france; reconsider; veto
Canada wants 3 weeks. How come all these countries with no armies think they should be able to say what happens with the armies of the ones that do??

Prairie

1 posted on 03/13/2003 4:43:35 AM PST by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
We should veto the Canadian initiative. As a reply to Toronto MP Dennis Mills latest riposte against our country.
2 posted on 03/13/2003 4:44:50 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
If Canada had 300,000 troops arrayed around Iraq I don't think they would find 3 weeks bearable.
3 posted on 03/13/2003 4:46:44 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
We should veto the Canadian initiative

Over a decade ago the New Republic had a contest for the most boring possible headline.

The winner, judged the most boring possible headline for a news story, was "Worthwhile Canadian Initiative".

That magazine was years ahead of its time.

4 posted on 03/13/2003 4:55:20 AM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
And the mess continues..
5 posted on 03/13/2003 4:56:30 AM PST by Dog ( Groundhog Day II -- the Sequel.....America held hostage by the UN.......where everyday is the same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Remember the conventional wisdom regarding the timing of the Afganistan assault? The US cannot fight in winter. It's absurd! The frigid mountains and snow, cold will make an assault impossible, the equipment inoperative. Our people cannot fight in the brutal Afghan winters that stop even the most stoic.

When did we fight? Winter. We launched an assault in Winter.

If there is one thing I have noticed about President Bush, it is his ability to think completely outside the box. That ability is a rare gift. He has it and demands it of his administration. I think if Saddam is betting that the desert heat will make an assault impossible, he doesn't understand the absolute power behind this military, nor does he know exactly what we can do.

Besides, this UN business is so much smoke and mirrors the idiots stonewalling have fallen prey to the distraction. The game is what is really the true alignment of the world and who are the players? Just goes to show what a true poker game is.
6 posted on 03/13/2003 5:01:22 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
"Spain said the document might be withdrawn because of a likely veto by France. "

Don't give the UN any more chances to disarm, withdraw the resolution and go get SoDumb. France and Germany have disarmed the UN. The US will disarm Iraq.
7 posted on 03/13/2003 5:06:04 AM PST by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Where has Canada been all these weeks? All talk of a few more days or weeks further strengthens Saddam as the international community splinters more each day. Those diplomats who cannot see that simple fact are too naive to hold any leadership position.
8 posted on 03/13/2003 5:11:13 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

9 posted on 03/13/2003 5:13:50 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
I've been there in April and May. I cannot imagine how bad it would be in June, July, or August. It's not just a matter of troops getting a little sweaty and uncomfortable. You're talking about troops wearing heavy chemical weapons suits in addition to normal equipment, and being unable to function for any period of time. I don't care whether you're inside or outside the box. It is not practical.
10 posted on 03/13/2003 5:24:08 AM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Peach
**Those diplomats who cannot see that simple fact are too naive to hold any leadership position.**

My concern Peach, is that they see this only too well.

Prairie
11 posted on 03/13/2003 5:31:38 AM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
It does seem deliberate, doesn't it ?
12 posted on 03/13/2003 6:09:08 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
10 Day Forecast for Baghdad

That's great weather. You don't know hot until you've spent a summer in south Louisiana... :)

13 posted on 03/13/2003 7:20:10 AM PST by danneskjold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: danneskjold
It's great weather now, but that's why we're still in the window for invasion. 30-60 days down the road is a different matter.

Plus, you were talking about Baghdad, and we're not quite there yet. We're still in Kuwait, and the weather there is already getting a bit warmer.

http://www.weather.com/outlook/travel/local/KUXX0003?whatprefs=&lswe=Kuwait%20City&lswa=WeatherLocalUndeclared

14 posted on 03/13/2003 7:47:41 AM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
My tribute to Jean and the Liberal Gov't of Canada:

http://www3.sympatico.ca/canada_sos/DamnLiberals.htm
15 posted on 03/13/2003 12:53:49 PM PST by IvanT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson