Posted on 03/06/2003 5:18:58 AM PST by MadIvan
The politically correct Christmas time advertisements of the Royal Canadian Mint, which rendered a traditional carol as the "Twelve Days of Giving," were offensive to nearly half the people who saw them, or 44%, according to a poll conducted for the mint.
But since most people surveyed said they were unaware of the $175,000 televised ad campaign, the mint has concluded it was basically a success.
Along with Toronto City Hall's short-lived use of the term "Holiday Tree" for its decorated conifer late last year, the mint ads drew condemnation from around the country for denying the Christian history of the winter holidays.
Greg Thompson, a Progressive Conservative MP, went so far as to demand of Parliament: "Whose decision was it to take the Christ out of Christmas?"
As the debate raged, agents of the mint were quietly surveying people to determine whether it was anything more than hype.
"[The poll] didn't impact any decision-making process, we just wanted to know," mint spokesman Phil Taylor said yesterday.
"There is little to be gained by pulling these advertisements or otherwise publicly responding to those who are aggravated by this issue," reads the report by polling firm Environics. "This is simply an issue that emerges at this time of year and the mint is best served by downplaying this issue."
The poll found 6% of people said their opinions of the mint would improve if the ads were to continue, while 14% said their opinions would worsen. However, only 10% were aware of the ad campaign, and a mere 2% were aware of the controversy.
More than three-quarters of people said the campaign would have no effect on the likelihood of their purchasing mint products in the future.
The poll was conducted in early December, in the latter days of the three-week campaign to sell collector coin sets. It was provided under access to information laws to David Murrell, an economist at the University of New Brunswick and a public interest researcher.
The cartoon theme of the campaign will be used again, Mr. Taylor said.
"The interesting part that we noted was that almost no Canadians were aware of [the campaign] ... and that most Canadians felt that it didn't change their perception about the mint. And I think those are the two key findings that we're going to move off of," he said.
Truly, the days of Hold Muh Beer in the Canadian government.
Regards, Ivan
The flag of Canada...before the trouble started.
Evidently the marketing objective was not to promote their product, communicate with the customer, or increase revenue. Only in the government...
From that definition it was a raging success!
That's a bargain... The Canadian government has spent C$1,000,000,000 on a firearms registry scheme which is an utter failure.
If you want on or off this list, please let me know!
Using the same criterion, the gun registry was a resounding success. Projected cost $2 million, actual cost over $1 billion and rising.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.