Skip to comments.
NORTH KOREAN MISSILE WARHEAD FOUND IN ALASKA
Korean Times ^
| March 4, 2003
| Staff Report
Posted on 03/04/2003 8:13:05 AM PST by ewing
North Korean Missile Warhead Found in Alaska
The warhead of a long range missile test fired by North Korea was found in the US state of Alaska, a report to the National Assembly revealed yesterday.
According to a United States document, 'The last piece of a missile warhead fired by North Korea was found in Alaska,' former Japanese Prime Minister Taro Nakayama was quoted as saying in the report.
'Washington, as well as Toyko, has so far underrated Pyongyang's missile capabilities.'
(Excerpt) Read more at times.hankooki.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 1993; alaska; alaskanoil; barbrastreisand; bravosierra; caribou; japan; missile; nkorea; northkorea; nuclearthreat; pyongyang; report; republicofkorea; untappedoil; warhead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-246 next last
To: Sabertooth
The DPRK announced concurrent with the 1998 launch that they'd successfully orbited a satellite. Independent verification of a satellite was never made.
Either they had their lies ready to go, or they really were trying to launch a satellite.
101
posted on
03/04/2003 8:51:12 AM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: ewing
That'll finally get the lefties POed when they realize N. Korea can hit ANWR.
102
posted on
03/04/2003 8:52:52 AM PST
by
putupon
(Boycot Michelin/Goodrich (Fr) and Contiental/General (Ger) Tires, & FStone, US but they suk)
To: ewing
I was doing a search on that question just now... "Didnt one of the Chinese Generals threaten LA with the long range missles a few years back? (before he was rebuked by Condi Rice) "
Read This:
http://www.oism.org/cdp/mar2001.htm
I'm leaving my desk now...I'll look again for that question when I'm back.
To: ewing
Odd that not one of the articles on this supposedly current news story gives any indication of when the thing was found.
104
posted on
03/04/2003 8:54:01 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: ewing
Pyongyang, "Crap, I sliced it...."
105
posted on
03/04/2003 8:54:38 AM PST
by
Greek
To: mabelkitty
Holly Crap! I didn't think of that!
< Leaves desk before tin foil makes it on my head >
To: Jeff Head; All
107
posted on
03/04/2003 8:56:15 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Give us back the USS Pueblo and we'll call it even.In 2001 the NKs sailed the USS Pueblo around the Korean Peninsula for use as a museum at another location. We could have seized it then if we had wanted it. It's still ours, theoretically, but it was decided that it was not worth it.
To: cake_crumb
Or even WHAT was found..
109
posted on
03/04/2003 8:57:05 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
Because a satellite launch would be launched eastwards due to the earth's rotation, it is fairly difficult to distinguish a NK satellite launch from a NK ballistic missle attack.
And we didn't then, and currently do not, have any ability to shoot down such a missle; ballistic missle defense is not deployed operationally.
It would be somewhat embarassing for the US to launch a nuke attack on NK and have their launched missle turn out to be a satellite.
Hence, I don't think you're going to see us launch nukes just because the NKs have launched a missle; there's no point in not waiting to see where such a missle lands.
To: Jeff Head
Ping!
To: Poohbah; Grampa Dave; ewing; longshadow
Either they had their lies ready to go, or they really were trying to launch a satellite.
Right. So the question is whether the fragment is consistent with a satellite, or a warhead?
Given the timing of the announcement of this "discovery," if it's a warhead fragment, that would be a causus belli with respect to the DPRK, eliminating the need for UN involvement, should we choose to go that route.
To: Grampa Dave
Remember those two freighters floating around the ocean that the US was watching? I wonder if they made their deposit then left?
113
posted on
03/04/2003 8:58:35 AM PST
by
mabelkitty
(Let's be pro-active - Start an "Impeach Hillary" campaign before she announces her candidacy)
To: Poohbah
North Korea wouldn't waste the money on sattelites. They just use that as a guise for testing their ballistic missles.
And as for this warhead, could it be from the dual stage missle they launched over Japan in the mid to late 90's? I heard the far stage hit off the coast of Alaska, maybe so as not to panic the public (and to not alert the North Koreans) the government hid the fact that it actually hit Alaska.
114
posted on
03/04/2003 8:58:40 AM PST
by
walkingdead
(easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
Comment #115 Removed by Moderator
To: Grampa Dave
See my
Post 93 Apparenlty it was debris from a late 1990's satellite insetion attempt. No warhead.
I guess my BS meter was concerning the report that the N. Koreans had tested a longrange ICBM whose warhead ended up in Alaska which is utter nonsense.
IMHO, the satellite fragment is totally plausible.
To: walkingdead
North Korea wouldn't waste the money on sattelites. They just use that as a guise for testing their ballistic missles.If you can get a substantial payload to orbit, it's proof that you can chuck an equally substantial payload to intercontinental distances.
117
posted on
03/04/2003 9:00:05 AM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: null and void
That would be news in Alaska. We lose airplanes, people, moose, you name it. A warhead? Did it say "Take That!" right above Made in NK?
118
posted on
03/04/2003 9:00:16 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
To: mabelkitty
This would have been done by one of their illegal crab/salmon fishing boats.
Those two ships which we have not heard anything probably had missiles sold to Iraq and Iran and maybe something that was radio active.
119
posted on
03/04/2003 9:01:33 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: HARD ATTACK 51
But the Chinese are peaceful!
Ask Diane Feinstein. Her husband owns three companies in China, and Diane would never compromise her position as a Senator to advance her own personal situation?
Beatch!
120
posted on
03/04/2003 9:02:14 AM PST
by
mabelkitty
(Let's be pro-active - Start an "Impeach Hillary" campaign before she announces her candidacy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-246 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson