Posted on 02/24/2003 12:01:43 PM PST by MikalM
Ruined Snow Penis Stimulates Debate
When a few members of the Harvard crew team decided to build a snowy representation of the male anatomy on Feb. 11, they never imagined it would be so hard to keep it up.
The 9-foot snow phallus, constructed in Tercentenary Theater, was torn down just hours after its erection.
But its impression still sparked an intense debate, from dining halls to dorm rooms, over the appropriateness of public displays of genitalia.
Even The Economist magazine weighed in on the discussion, offering the destruction of the sculpture as evidence of American prudishness on its usually staid pages.
But womens groups on campus have led a chorus of complaints against the snow penis, arguing that such a display is demeaning to women.
It was offensive because it was pornographic, said Amy E. Keel 04, who said she and her roommate dismantled the giant snow penis.
As a feminist, pornography is degrading to women and creates a violent atmosphere, she said.
Keel said that her personal experience as a rape survivor makes this statue even more uncomfortable to observe.
Men think they have the right to force that on you, she said. Its a logical extension.
Furthermore, Keel claims that she and her roommate were verbally and physically harassed by a group of roughly 25 men when they attempted to tear down the statue with a cardboard tube at 1:30 a.m. the morning after it was built.
A few people came out and crowded me with their bodies and one person shoved me away from the penis, she said. It was gendered violence, because [their comments] were said in the context of our gender and accompanied by aggressive actions toward us.
Though Keel assumed some of her harassers were among the creators of the statue, she said she could not identify any of the men.
And crew team captain Michael J. Skey 04 denies that he or any of the other makers of the statue had been involved in the incident. According to Spey, the group left the Yard over three hours before Keel and her roommate tried to take down the snow phallus.
We cleared out by 10:15 p.m., Spey said. We had morning practice, and if guys are out there that late Id be pissed. Thats why we did it so early.
But regardless of the alleged circumstances surrounding the snow penis downfall, a controversy over the meaning of the statue lingers.
Womens Studies Lecturer Diane L. Rosenfeld, who teaches Women, Violence and the Law this semester, said that the implications of the snow phallus go beyond the legitimacy of the statues presence.
The ice sculpture was erected in a public space, one that should be free from menacing reminders of womens sexual vulnerability, Rosenfeld wrote in an e-mail yesterday.
She said the snow penis follows a long line of public phallic symbols, including the Washington Monument and missiles.
Women do not need to be reminded of the power of the symbol of the male genitalia, Rosenfeld said. My guess is that they are constantly reminded of it in daily messages.
A discussion about feminist perspectives on the statue, sponsored by the Radcliffe Union of Students, will take place Tuesday night in the Adams House small dining room.
But the makers of the statue said they intended to build the snow penis as a simple joke.
Skey said he came up with the idea to allow a few members of the team to hang out together outside of practice.
We built it for fun, instead of building a snowman, he said. We built it specifically as a junior high prank.
Skey said he never expected such national attentionor such heated opposition.
Once it turned around into a huge sexism debate, it was like a giant keg of gunpowder waiting for a spark, Skey said.
In spite of Skeys intentions, Keel said she was offended by the joke.
I have a right to speak out against the joke, Keel said. I criticize the motives of putting it up, but since they did, it is within my rights to put it down. It goes both ways.
Skey said he agreed Keel did not do anything wrong by knocking down the statue.
If people found it obscene, they had a right to rip it down, he said. Thats perfectly true.
But Skey said he thinks that at a school like Harvard, jokes can be blown out of proportion.
Smart kids overanalyze things, he said.
Staff writer Hana R. Alberts can be reached at alberts@fas.harvard.edu.
LOLOL!!!!
Check #40.
Two different issues here, the display and the crazy chick.
They could have just flashed a picture of Janet Reno in front of it (I'm melting! I'm meellting...)
As for public art displaying genitalia being immoral, wouldn't that disqualify a lot of the great paintings and statues of the last 2500 years from ever being shown?
... as do the stupid.
"Put some ice on that" and "it's just sex".
Let the college kiddies at Hahvahd ponder that in their poli-sci classes.
And I wonder if they see the irony in their action?
I don't recall any great paintings and statues of an errect penis being displayed publicly. Perhaps you could point some of them out? If a man goes out and publicly displays his naked errection he will end up in jail and, probably, a registered sex offender for the rest of his life. Deliberatly displaying an errect phallus publicly is not that different. It is inappropriate and a violation of public morals (except, maybe, in countries like California). I find the Vagina Monologues equally offensive, but thay are not being performed openly in public where everyone passing by is exposed to them.
Yes we do..... remind me......
I seriously can't believe there are people in the world who use sentences like this with a straight face.
My thoughts exactly.
SD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.