Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruined Snow Penis Stimulates Debate (Loony Feminist Alert!)
Harvard Crimson ^ | Monday, February 24, 2003 | HANA R. ALBERTS

Posted on 02/24/2003 12:01:43 PM PST by MikalM

Ruined Snow Penis Stimulates Debate

When a few members of the Harvard crew team decided to build a snowy representation of the male anatomy on Feb. 11, they never imagined it would be so hard to keep it up.

The 9-foot snow phallus, constructed in Tercentenary Theater, was torn down just hours after its erection.

But its impression still sparked an intense debate, from dining halls to dorm rooms, over the appropriateness of public displays of genitalia.

Even The Economist magazine weighed in on the discussion, offering the destruction of the sculpture as evidence of American prudishness on its usually staid pages.

But women’s groups on campus have led a chorus of complaints against the snow penis, arguing that such a display is demeaning to women.

“It was offensive because it was pornographic,” said Amy E. Keel ’04, who said she and her roommate “dismantled” the giant snow penis.

“As a feminist, pornography is degrading to women and creates a violent atmosphere,” she said.

Keel said that her personal experience as a rape survivor makes this statue even more uncomfortable to observe.

“Men think they have the right to force that on you,” she said. “It’s a logical extension.”

Furthermore, Keel claims that she and her roommate were verbally and physically harassed by a group of roughly 25 men when they attempted to tear down the statue with a cardboard tube at 1:30 a.m. the morning after it was built.

“A few people came out and crowded me with their bodies and one person shoved me away from the penis,” she said. “It was gendered violence, because [their comments] were said in the context of our gender and accompanied by aggressive actions toward us.”

Though Keel assumed some of her harassers were among the creators of the statue, she said she could not identify any of the men.

And crew team captain Michael J. Skey ’04 denies that he or any of the other makers of the statue had been involved in the incident. According to Spey, the group left the Yard over three hours before Keel and her roommate tried to take down the snow phallus.

“We cleared out by 10:15 p.m.,” Spey said. “We had morning practice, and if guys are out there that late I’d be pissed. That’s why we did it so early.”

But regardless of the alleged circumstances surrounding the snow penis’ downfall, a controversy over the meaning of the statue lingers.

Women’s Studies Lecturer Diane L. Rosenfeld, who teaches Women, Violence and the Law this semester, said that the implications of the snow phallus go beyond the legitimacy of the statue’s presence.

“The ice sculpture was erected in a public space, one that should be free from menacing reminders of women’s sexual vulnerability,” Rosenfeld wrote in an e-mail yesterday.

She said the snow penis follows a long line of public phallic symbols, including the Washington Monument and missiles.

“Women do not need to be reminded of the power of the symbol of the male genitalia,” Rosenfeld said. “My guess is that they are constantly reminded of it in daily messages.”

A discussion about feminist perspectives on the statue, sponsored by the Radcliffe Union of Students, will take place Tuesday night in the Adams House small dining room.

But the makers of the statue said they intended to build the snow penis as a simple joke.

Skey said he came up with the idea to allow a few members of the team to “hang out together” outside of practice.

“We built it for fun, instead of building a snowman,” he said. “We built it specifically as a junior high prank.”

Skey said he never expected such national attention—or such heated opposition.

“Once it turned around into a huge sexism debate, it was like a giant keg of gunpowder waiting for a spark,” Skey said.

In spite of Skey’s intentions, Keel said she was offended by the joke.

“I have a right to speak out against the joke,” Keel said. “I criticize the motives of putting it up, but since they did, it is within my rights to put it down. It goes both ways.”

Skey said he agreed Keel did not do anything wrong by knocking down the statue.

“If people found it obscene, they had a right to rip it down,” he said. “That’s perfectly true.”

But Skey said he thinks that at a school like Harvard, jokes can be blown out of proportion.

“Smart kids overanalyze things,” he said.

—Staff writer Hana R. Alberts can be reached at alberts@fas.harvard.edu.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: academia; castration; demonstration; feminazi; feminazis; feminist; feministas; frigidwomen; harvard; idiotarian; itsjustsex; left; massachusetts; pc; penisenvy; politicallycorrect; protest; puritanism; putsomeiceonit; sexualbutchery; university; vandalism; victimology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last
To: MikalM
When a few members of the Harvard crew team decided to build a snowy representation of the male anatomy on Feb. 11, they never imagined it would be so hard to keep it up.

LOLOL!!!!

41 posted on 02/24/2003 12:25:40 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
scary thing is, she's probably pretty tame compared to the rest of the Hahvad population.
42 posted on 02/24/2003 12:25:44 PM PST by Semaphore Heathcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
Check Post #14.

Check #40.

Two different issues here, the display and the crazy chick.

43 posted on 02/24/2003 12:26:53 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
The 9-foot snow phallus, constructed in Tercentenary Theater, was torn down just hours after its erection.

They could have just flashed a picture of Janet Reno in front of it (I'm melting! I'm meellting...)

44 posted on 02/24/2003 12:27:50 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semaphore Heathcliffe
Yes, the Rice of the North has its drawbacks. ;^)
45 posted on 02/24/2003 12:28:21 PM PST by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
ROFL. I figured this had to be from BSNN or the Onion at first.
46 posted on 02/24/2003 12:29:44 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (Every man dies. Not every man really lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
Obviously boobies aren't "threatening" or "violent" like the erect penis is.
47 posted on 02/24/2003 12:31:29 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: templar
The point of bringing up Post #14 (the VAGINA MONOLOGUES reference) was to show the incredible double standards these people have. A snow construction that will melt in a few days is a public obscenity, but a tuition- and tax-subsidized three-hour paean to female genitalia is a triumph. Especially if it celebrates the seduction of a 16 YO girl by a middle-aged lesbian (yup, that's one of the "Monologues"...)

As for public art displaying genitalia being immoral, wouldn't that disqualify a lot of the great paintings and statues of the last 2500 years from ever being shown?

48 posted on 02/24/2003 12:33:21 PM PST by MikalM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
“Smart kids overanalyze things,” he said.

... as do the stupid.

49 posted on 02/24/2003 12:39:23 PM PST by theDentist (So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I have two things to say:

"Put some ice on that" and "it's just sex".

Let the college kiddies at Hahvahd ponder that in their poli-sci classes.

50 posted on 02/24/2003 12:40:01 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
A clear cut case of Female Genital Mutilation - I'm against that, even if it's 9 ft and gives me feelings of inadequacy.
51 posted on 02/24/2003 12:41:01 PM PST by Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
On a side note: I wonder what device(s) they used for the Bobbitizing procedure?

And I wonder if they see the irony in their action?

52 posted on 02/24/2003 12:43:12 PM PST by theDentist (So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
As for public art displaying genitalia being immoral, wouldn't that disqualify a lot of the great paintings and statues of the last 2500 years from ever being shown?

I don't recall any great paintings and statues of an errect penis being displayed publicly. Perhaps you could point some of them out? If a man goes out and publicly displays his naked errection he will end up in jail and, probably, a registered sex offender for the rest of his life. Deliberatly displaying an errect phallus publicly is not that different. It is inappropriate and a violation of public morals (except, maybe, in countries like California). I find the Vagina Monologues equally offensive, but thay are not being performed openly in public where everyone passing by is exposed to them.

53 posted on 02/24/2003 12:44:18 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MikalM

That is NOT where the carrot goes on a snowman!

54 posted on 02/24/2003 12:45:17 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Women do not need to be reminded of the power of the symbol of the male genitalia,” Rosenfeld said

Yes we do..... remind me......

55 posted on 02/24/2003 12:45:47 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

This is way too Freudian for me to comment.
56 posted on 02/24/2003 12:47:51 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: templar
Are you kidding? Erect phalluses adorned tables, chairs, paintings, frescoes, statues, just about everything in ancient Rome. It was a common symbol in ancient Greece as well. They were so common as to be literally part of the furniture.

The reason you don't recall any of them is that they usually don't show up on TV or in coffee-table art books.
57 posted on 02/24/2003 12:47:57 PM PST by wimpycat (Well it's good that you're fine and I'm fine. I agree with you. It's great to be fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
Heck, a couple of my buddies and I built a snow penis out on Commonwealth Avenue in front of our MIT fraternity house one night. Even colored the tip with red foot coloring in water and stuck a bunch of twigs on the base for pubic hair. Left it there overnight until we got sick of it and tore it down the next morning.

It's a sophmoric prank and if Amy and her friends were offended, I can see why. But to make this a big feminist case is too ridiculous.
58 posted on 02/24/2003 12:48:03 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
In fierce foaming flare-up
Fems fight
Perpetual priapic push
Upwelling 'gainst
Strictures silly and insane.
59 posted on 02/24/2003 12:49:46 PM PST by ricpic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semaphore Heathcliffe
“It was gendered violence, because [their comments] were said in the context of our gender and accompanied by aggressive actions toward us.”

I seriously can't believe there are people in the world who use sentences like this with a straight face.

My thoughts exactly.

SD

60 posted on 02/24/2003 12:49:57 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson