To: Cultural Jihad
"
By whom? The Grand Dragon's Kangaroo Kourt?"Quite possibly a good name for them.
No, it was the New York State Supreme Court in a ruling on an immigration case where some people had inported a moslem poo-bah as a teacher. The ruling has never been vacated or overturned, so it stands todaya as the law of the land.
To: nightdriver
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't a NY Supreme Court apply in NY only? Wouldn't it have to be a federal court ruling to be the 'law of the land'?
16 posted on
02/22/2003 8:11:34 PM PST by
justshe
(Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor. Only YOU can prevent Freepathons!)
To: nightdriver
So, you don't mind unconstitutional Judicial activism, as long as it is an unconstitutional bit of Judicial activism that you approve of?
The law of the land is the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and subsequent Amendments, not a New York State Supreme Court ruling.
22 posted on
02/22/2003 8:34:17 PM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: nightdriver
Whatever strikes at the root of Christianity tends manifestly to the
dissolution of civil government, because it tends to corrupt the morals of
the people, and to destroy good order.
Supreme Court of New York, 1811
24 posted on
02/22/2003 8:36:09 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson