Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush, Blair give Saddam 21 days to disarm or face war
The Times of India ^ | 2/21/03

Posted on 02/21/2003 7:56:12 PM PST by areafiftyone

LONDON: In a significant trans-Atlantic pincer movement to make the case for war, US secretary of state Colin Powell has given British television viewers advance notice of next week’s second United Nations resolution, while America’s chief ally, Tony Blair, canvasses support on the European mainland.

In a rare interview to the BBC, billed by the organisation as "exclusive", Powell revealed that the second UN resolution would contain no deadline and would not authorise or specify military action.

Meanwhile, in an apparent quickening of the pace to war, President Bush and Blair are reported by at least one British paper to have decided on a 21-day deadline.

The paper said the two men, who had a 30-minute telephone conversation on Thursday, had agreed to give Saddam Hussein until March 14 to disarm or face war.

The two men were reported to have put in place the "endgame" in the long stand-off with Baghdad.

In an orchestrated initiative, late on Friday, British foreign secretary Jack Straw made a hard-edged "moral case for war", ahead of Blair’s Saturday meeting with Pope John Paul II in the Vatican.

The Pope has spoken out against war and a reluctant Vatican is understood to have granted Blair an audience, only to appear even-handed.

Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz was given an unprecedented half-hour meeting with the Holy Father last week.

The rising rhetoric of a "moral war" comes as the heads of both the Catholic Church and of 70 million Anglican Christians around the world, have firmly rejected the morality of bombing Baghdad into submission.

On Thursday night, Powell, who spoke with quiet intensity, insisted a second UN resolution did not need to authorise the use of force. That hurdle had already been crossed, Powell indicated.

The new resolution, he said, would "summarise the situation... as it exists - show that Iraq is not in compliance …will point out that lack of co-operation".

Military force had already been authorised by the six-page UN Security Council resolution 1441 unanimously passed last November, Powell said.

He said the resolution would probably not contain a specific deadline for Iraqi compliance, but added the mantra: "Clearly time is running out…"

In the British government’s most outspoken attack on last weekend’s unprecedented anti-war protests in Britain and around the world, Jack Straw criticised the demonstrators’ "relativist nonsense" about human rights abuse.

Saddam’s was a brutal regime, he said and it was not enough to say Iraq should not be invaded because human rights abuse occurred in other countries as well.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: gw2; iraq; war; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2003 7:56:12 PM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Too damn long.
2 posted on 02/21/2003 8:00:00 PM PST by mhking ("The word is no. I am therefore going anyway..." --Admiral J.T. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
If Iraq is such a threat to the United States, Congress should declare war and Bush should get on with it.

The rest of the world might not like it, but 'them liking it' really isn't a requirement.

With each passing day that this drags out, it's becoming apparent to me that this whole episode has more to do with legitimizing the UN and the New World Order than anything else.

3 posted on 02/21/2003 8:00:06 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking; Poohbah
Gotta get folks in position. Get intelligence data. Wrap up a few more tango nets...

First things first.

Besides, it gives me a little more time for some practice at the range... :)
4 posted on 02/21/2003 8:03:54 PM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
21 stinkin' days??????

What in the world are they thinking? First of all - why would they give such a precise time for war to begin - doesn't sound like good strategy.

Second of all - Is 12 years and umpteen UN resolutions not enough warning or chances? We discuss the irrelivance of the UN when they keep putting this off, but now we are falling into the same trap. I find it hard to believe that Saddam is such a danger if we can continue to put off any real action.

5 posted on 02/21/2003 8:05:03 PM PST by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Another 21 days?
6 posted on 02/21/2003 8:05:10 PM PST by Bogey78O (It's not a Zero it's an "O")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder

What an odd conclusion for you to draw...

7 posted on 02/21/2003 8:05:25 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *war_list; Ernest_at_the_Beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
8 posted on 02/21/2003 8:05:37 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Meanwhile, in an apparent quickening of the pace to war, President Bush and Blair are reported by at least one British paper to have decided on a 21-day deadline.

Quickening? Hardly. Our window of opportunity is closing fast. Let's get this damn show on the road already!

9 posted on 02/21/2003 8:06:09 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkwells
ping
10 posted on 02/21/2003 8:07:44 PM PST by snippy_about_it ( Pray for our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
21 days? March something? I thought we couldn't do anything after March 1 because of the heat. This is too strange. Are Bush and Blair TRYING to lose support?
11 posted on 02/21/2003 8:09:34 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Gotta get folks in position. Get intelligence data. Wrap up a few more tango nets...

Puh-leeze. This is about appeasing the UN. Nothing more and nothing less. Please don't spin it as anything else.

MM

12 posted on 02/21/2003 8:09:34 PM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I know it is. But I think this is all planned out. It seems like Bush is always one ahead of Saddam.
13 posted on 02/21/2003 8:09:47 PM PST by areafiftyone (The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Is this, like, before or after St. Patrick's Day?

Oh, just looked. COOL. We can take care of this over the weekend, and enjoy an event free Guinness and Lamb Stew..

14 posted on 02/21/2003 8:10:53 PM PST by Experiment 6-2-6 (Meega, Nala Kweesta!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"The rising rhetoric of a "moral war" comes as the heads of both the Catholic Church and of 70 million Anglican Christians around the world, have firmly rejected the morality of bombing Baghdad into submission.",

These idiots are no more moral than Hugh Hefner....while they fiddle faddle....the Iraqi public dies.....oh, I am beginning to wonder about ANY church these days.

15 posted on 02/21/2003 8:11:09 PM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Yeah, sure...
16 posted on 02/21/2003 8:11:56 PM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The Times of India does not name the "one paper" which cites the 21-day limit.

This article has nothing of substance to offer.

Therefore I advise we attack Monday March 3 the next new moon:

1) Jacques Chirac
2) Hollywood
3) Kofi Annan
4) Gerhard Schroeder
5) Saddam Hussein's stocks of Viagra
6) Iowa

Then we get series.

17 posted on 02/21/2003 8:12:12 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The paper said the two men, who had a 30-minute telephone conversation on Thursday, had agreed to give Saddam Hussein until March 14 to disarm or face war.

As President Bush once said, "Those who know aren't telling."

18 posted on 02/21/2003 8:12:27 PM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Well, I will say this, the heat starts going up really soon, they must be uber confident to give them such a short window of decent weather.
19 posted on 02/21/2003 8:12:42 PM PST by Blue Scourge (Real American...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I think YOU are correct...I don't think there will be much need for men on the ground sweating it out.....the targets are known, IMHO, and we've got the "munitions" necessary to wipe them out....then it's a matter of cleanup.
20 posted on 02/21/2003 8:13:12 PM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson