Skip to comments.
The next tech toy: X-ray cameras
canaday.com ^
| Sunday, February 16, 2003
| Sarah Staples
Posted on 02/17/2003 8:46:23 AM PST by avg_freeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
I'm sure that our public servants will only use this device for constitutionally allowable purposes.
To: *Privacy_list; *tech_index
2
posted on
02/17/2003 8:50:14 AM PST
by
Free the USA
(Stooge for the Rich)
To: avg_freeper
I think I'll become a cop, or a pervert, no a cop, no a pervert, damn the line is too blurry these days.
To: Porterville
I think the blurriness is in your own thinking.
4
posted on
02/17/2003 8:58:03 AM PST
by
tallhappy
To: avg_freeper
This is old technology. Sony had to add a filter to their nightvision video cameras in 1998 because using the cameras during the day allowed users to see through clothes.
Click here for story
5
posted on
02/17/2003 9:00:50 AM PST
by
occam's chainsaw
(Support your local Border Patrol)
To: avg_freeper
Who is that guy with the big teats? I just gotta know.
6
posted on
02/17/2003 9:01:09 AM PST
by
Fester Chugabrew
(I hate NASCAR. It's so . . . .racist.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
I think he needs a 'bro'.
To: Fester Chugabrew
I think thats Paula Zahn!!!
To: occam's chainsaw
A lab that I worked at had a closed circuit camera that would do that. You could also see the flash from remote control LEDs in it to. Wasn't a real need to try see under the clothing of pasty white engineer types like me though.
On a side note, I knew a guy that worked for KODAK in the special camera development dept. He was in town showing us how to use a high speed camera our lab had just bought. Well he started to tell us about how the Dallas Cowboys use it to film their guys occasionally. How they leave the line, impact during tackle, kick, things like that.
Well anyway like any guy might of done, he happened to train the camera on the cheerleaders and record them while they were out. So for any dynamicists out there that might have wondered; Yes indeed they have symmetric and anti-symmetric modes. Although you might still want to verify this in the field.
To: occam's chainsaw
Similar result but different part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: avg_freeper
You could also see the flash from remote control LEDs in it You can see remotes flash with nearly any video camera. I have used this method to test remote controls for years.
12
posted on
02/17/2003 9:44:53 AM PST
by
occam's chainsaw
(Support your local Border Patrol)
To: Lijahsbubbe
I think he needs a 'bro'. ...or perhaps a 'mansierre'?
13
posted on
02/17/2003 9:47:37 AM PST
by
occam's chainsaw
(Support your local Border Patrol)
To: occam's chainsaw
Having worked in Casino Surveillance for over 7 years, I had the opportunity to see some pretty wild technology as cameras are concerned. Even the lower end B&W stuff that we used at my last job had some interesting capabilities.
For the most part, the cameras were extremely low lux, so that they would work in the often low light conditions in some portions of the casino. Now, there were several cameras mounted in such an area that was dark, but had recessed lighting that beamed light into concentrated areas (walkways, etc.)
When someone wearing clothing that wasn't knit real close walked by, the light would be allowed through their clothing and reflect off their skin, causing an 'x-ray' effect in almost every case.
Crazy stuff, I'll tell you - and those were not even nightvision cameras.
14
posted on
02/17/2003 9:48:54 AM PST
by
dware
(Help expose the commie organizations: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844750/posts)
To: The Electrician
True, I suppose I should have read the article before posting 8^)
15
posted on
02/17/2003 9:49:20 AM PST
by
occam's chainsaw
(Support your local Border Patrol)
To: occam's chainsaw
This is old technology. Sony had to add a filter to their nightvision video cameras in 1998 because using the cameras during the day allowed users to see through clothes.
Sony used infrared. Similar appearing outcomes; two different technologies.
16
posted on
02/17/2003 9:52:08 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: aruanan
Sony used infrared. Similar appearing outcomes; two different technologies. In 1988 we were testing an IR camera and took a photo of a good looking secretary with it. When she saw the photo she was quite surprised to see the effect. The body gives off different amounts of heat from different parts, she looked undressed.
She was a good sport about it, (and somewhat of an exhibitionist too). In today's environment, she could sue and win.
To: avg_freeper
See where terahertz radiation fits into the continuum of the electromagetic spectrum:
The electromagnetic spectrum in order (short to longer wavelength): gamma ray, x-ray, Ultra-violet, visible, infra-red, terahertz, microwave, radio.
The terahertz region has been (for 100 years) a kind of no-man's-land, lying between the infra-red light and the microwave radio.
Terahertz radiation:
* interacts with (and is partially absorbed by) some matter,
* is largely absorbed by some matter,
* passes through some matter without being altered, and
* reflects from other matter.
So it can tell a Lot about the type of matter it is striking.
It is much shorter in wavelength (higher resolution) than microwave.
We have only begun to study this last area of the spectrum.
To: edwin hubble
But..
Terahertz technology is not conventional infra-red.
It doesn't function with the same optical devices.
To: Fester Chugabrew
It's Pat!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson