Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The next tech toy: X-ray cameras
canaday.com ^ | Sunday, February 16, 2003 | Sarah Staples

Posted on 02/17/2003 8:46:23 AM PST by avg_freeper


Sunday, February 16, 2003
The 'terahertz' camera at work: This man is fully clothed.
 

Voyeurs take note: a portable, cheap camera that can see through objects and clothing may be available for sale to common folk in as little as five years, say British-based space researchers.

The camera, built by a European Space Agency-funded team working at a lab in central England, could one day be used to find skin cancer or hidden weapons, reveal wounds beneath animal fur or bandages, spot forged works of art, even pierce through fog.

The technology was unveiled last fall, but it was just this week that the scientists announced the release of photos demonstrating just how well it works.

One of the grainy "photographs" shows a hand snapped through a 15-millimetre stack of paper.

Another shows a man's torso photographed through his clothing.

The shots were taken using the world's first "terahertz camera" -- a device that captures and focuses electromagnetic waves from a portion of the spectrum somewhere between infrared and microwaves.

People, rocks, water, trees and stars all emit terahertz rays, which the "camera" focuses into images by contrasting terahertz transmission and reflection properties. The millimetre-long waves are directed along miniature circuits etched onto sliver-thin silica wafers.

The device doesn't emit harmful radiation. But like radiation -- and unlike heat or light -- the waves pass easily through certain solid materials like walls and clothes. By analysing the frequencies of emissions, the "photographer" can also figure out the chemical and physical makeup of certain objects.

The camera is a scaled-down version of hefty equipment developed elsewhere to screen for hidden explosives or biological weapons in parcels and luggage.

Shaped like an end table, and with prototypes the size of picnic basket now at the design stage, it will be compact and portable enough to park in a doctor's office, and can be adapted to a range of non-medical applications.

"The type of thing used now is huge," said Michael Sandford, who supervised the team at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, in Chilton, Oxfordshire, that designed the camera.

"Although we're still a long way off to building something the size of a camera, the technology has been demonstrated in this smaller form. It's only a matter of engineering it for a particular product."

Experts from across Europe came to Rutherford to build the camera under a four-month, $650,000 European Space Agency technology grant that ended recently, and the laboratory is carrying on their work.

Lead researchers Peter de Maagt and Chris Mann are testing the camera's ability to see through various types of materials. They expect to be ready to move into production for medical purposes within a couple of years, Mr. Sandford said.

Meantime, patents have been filed on the device, and Mr. de Maagt and Mr. Mann are courting entrepreneurs who would bring it to market.

The materials used to make the camera are cheap enough to make the device accessible to the average consumer.

So although it is being developed to save lives and detect bombs, the spokesman acknowledged that it may be put to less-useful ends.

"In principle it could see through clothes, and (in) pictures published at lower frequencies you can see the outline of the body. We haven't even tried that," he said. "Though I'm sure there will be people who will want to."

© Copyright 2003 The Ottawa Citizen


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: photography; privacylist; techindex; terahertz; xray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I'm sure that our public servants will only use this device for constitutionally allowable purposes.
1 posted on 02/17/2003 8:46:23 AM PST by avg_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Privacy_list; *tech_index
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
2 posted on 02/17/2003 8:50:14 AM PST by Free the USA (Stooge for the Rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
I think I'll become a cop, or a pervert, no a cop, no a pervert, damn the line is too blurry these days.
3 posted on 02/17/2003 8:51:41 AM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
I think the blurriness is in your own thinking.
4 posted on 02/17/2003 8:58:03 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
This is old technology. Sony had to add a filter to their nightvision video cameras in 1998 because using the cameras during the day allowed users to see through clothes.

Click here for story

5 posted on 02/17/2003 9:00:50 AM PST by occam's chainsaw (Support your local Border Patrol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
Who is that guy with the big teats? I just gotta know.
6 posted on 02/17/2003 9:01:09 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I hate NASCAR. It's so . . . .racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
I think he needs a 'bro'.
7 posted on 02/17/2003 9:04:19 AM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
I think thats Paula Zahn!!!
8 posted on 02/17/2003 9:13:20 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: occam's chainsaw
A lab that I worked at had a closed circuit camera that would do that. You could also see the flash from remote control LEDs in it to. Wasn't a real need to try see under the clothing of pasty white engineer types like me though.

On a side note, I knew a guy that worked for KODAK in the special camera development dept. He was in town showing us how to use a high speed camera our lab had just bought. Well he started to tell us about how the Dallas Cowboys use it to film their guys occasionally. How they leave the line, impact during tackle, kick, things like that.

Well anyway like any guy might of done, he happened to train the camera on the cheerleaders and record them while they were out. So for any dynamicists out there that might have wondered; Yes indeed they have symmetric and anti-symmetric modes. Although you might still want to verify this in the field.

9 posted on 02/17/2003 9:20:46 AM PST by avg_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: occam's chainsaw
Similar result but different part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
10 posted on 02/17/2003 9:36:12 AM PST by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: avg_freeper
You could also see the flash from remote control LEDs in it

You can see remotes flash with nearly any video camera. I have used this method to test remote controls for years.

12 posted on 02/17/2003 9:44:53 AM PST by occam's chainsaw (Support your local Border Patrol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
I think he needs a 'bro'.

...or perhaps a 'mansierre'?


13 posted on 02/17/2003 9:47:37 AM PST by occam's chainsaw (Support your local Border Patrol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: occam's chainsaw
Having worked in Casino Surveillance for over 7 years, I had the opportunity to see some pretty wild technology as cameras are concerned. Even the lower end B&W stuff that we used at my last job had some interesting capabilities.

For the most part, the cameras were extremely low lux, so that they would work in the often low light conditions in some portions of the casino. Now, there were several cameras mounted in such an area that was dark, but had recessed lighting that beamed light into concentrated areas (walkways, etc.)

When someone wearing clothing that wasn't knit real close walked by, the light would be allowed through their clothing and reflect off their skin, causing an 'x-ray' effect in almost every case.

Crazy stuff, I'll tell you - and those were not even nightvision cameras.

14 posted on 02/17/2003 9:48:54 AM PST by dware (Help expose the commie organizations: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844750/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
True, I suppose I should have read the article before posting 8^)
15 posted on 02/17/2003 9:49:20 AM PST by occam's chainsaw (Support your local Border Patrol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: occam's chainsaw
This is old technology. Sony had to add a filter to their nightvision video cameras in 1998 because using the cameras during the day allowed users to see through clothes.

Sony used infrared. Similar appearing outcomes; two different technologies.
16 posted on 02/17/2003 9:52:08 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Sony used infrared. Similar appearing outcomes; two different technologies.

In 1988 we were testing an IR camera and took a photo of a good looking secretary with it. When she saw the photo she was quite surprised to see the effect. The body gives off different amounts of heat from different parts, she looked undressed.

She was a good sport about it, (and somewhat of an exhibitionist too). In today's environment, she could sue and win.

17 posted on 02/17/2003 9:57:26 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
See where terahertz radiation fits into the continuum of the electromagetic spectrum:

The electromagnetic spectrum in order (short to longer wavelength): gamma ray, x-ray, Ultra-violet, visible, infra-red, terahertz, microwave, radio.

The terahertz region has been (for 100 years) a kind of no-man's-land, lying between the infra-red light and the microwave radio.

Terahertz radiation:
* interacts with (and is partially absorbed by) some matter,
* is largely absorbed by some matter,
* passes through some matter without being altered, and
* reflects from other matter.

So it can tell a Lot about the type of matter it is striking.

It is much shorter in wavelength (higher resolution) than microwave.

We have only begun to study this last area of the spectrum.

18 posted on 02/17/2003 10:18:22 AM PST by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble
But..

Terahertz technology is not conventional infra-red.
It doesn't function with the same optical devices.
19 posted on 02/17/2003 10:20:24 AM PST by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
It's Pat!
20 posted on 02/17/2003 10:20:52 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson