Skip to comments.
AFL-CIO Chairman Says Former NATO Commander Gen. Wesley Clark to Announce 2004 Presdiential Bid
The New York Times and the Associated Press ^
| February 6, 2003
| Wire Report
Posted on 02/06/2003 6:55:47 AM PST by ewing
Top Democrats say former NATO Commander General Wesley Clark has expressed interest in running for President of the United States in the 2004 Democratic Primary Season and the American Federation of Labor's Political Chairman says he expects General Clark to announce that he is in the Democrat race in three weeks.
But Clark restated his position Wednesday that he has nothing planned.
The Arkansas businessman and military affairs commentator for the Cable News Network said of the latest prediction, [of his impending three week deadline for a Presidential announcement] 'There's no truth to it.'
'I am not a member of a political party, I am not a candidate, I haven't raised any political money,' Clark said in a telephone interview.
'I don't have any timeline.'
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2004; commander; dims; generalclark; nato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: ewing
'I am not a member of a political party, I am not a candidate, I haven't raised any political money,' Clark said in a telephone interview. How do you write a headline in a newspaper based on these underlying facts? The NY Slimes is tabloid trash.
21
posted on
02/06/2003 7:36:50 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: gov_bean_ counter
I don't think any of us military guys view General Clark as a military man.
A wimp, a jerk, a fool, yes, but not a military man.
Lets hope the democRATS pick him. A sure loser.
22
posted on
02/06/2003 7:37:12 AM PST
by
OldCorps
To: Just mythoughts
You must have been watching the Washington Press Club roast last night..
23
posted on
02/06/2003 7:37:16 AM PST
by
ewing
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Or Donna Brazlile is busy playing the race card for him.
24
posted on
02/06/2003 7:38:29 AM PST
by
ewing
To: 1Old Pro
Is Clark independently wealthy, or will he have to fundraise?
I know that Kerry is considering opting out of the system and paying the 250 million himself.
25
posted on
02/06/2003 7:40:03 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
Just the other day, one of my cats expressed an interest in running for President. I think he would do a much better job than any of the Dims that have so far announced.
26
posted on
02/06/2003 7:43:47 AM PST
by
trebb
To: trebb
Cats cannot be President....they exist only in a monarchy - Kings and Queens!
27
posted on
02/06/2003 7:45:52 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
To: ewing
Unless he has some sort of built-in protection from Arkansas, I don't think the Perfumed Prince can withstand scrutiny of his career (early Vietnam) nor his arrogance. IMHO, Clark is not a likeable person by the standards of either side. Boy, we're getting some weirdos crawling out of the woodwork.
28
posted on
02/06/2003 7:46:00 AM PST
by
FryingPan101
(You're either with us or you're not.)
To: CatoRenasci
Is it possible that money is the collective motive behind the odd assortment of democrat presidential candidates? Has a loophole been discovered that essentially would permit campaign funds to be transferred openly to personal accounts.
IMHO, Clark could not withstand a closer look at his unprecedented rise through the ranks and the many accusations of buffoonery that has plagued his career. But what the hell, he is a Rhodes Scholar.
Snips of info:
General Wesley Clark was involved in the siege and final assault near Waco, Texas that killed, by a combination of toxic gas and fire, at least 82 people including some three dozen women, children and infants.
As outlandish as this claim may seem, it's a reasonable conclusion that can be drawn by any fair minded person who takes the time to examine the evidence. Further, there is substantial circumstantial evidence that, Clark, in addition to acting as a tactical consultant, may, in fact, have been the prime architect and commander of the entire operation.
The initial reaction of virtually every person who hears about Clark's involvement in the attack on the Mt. Carmel Center of the Branch Davidians outside of Waco, Texas is surprise and/or disbelief: "I thought it was an ATF/FBI operation that went wrong and all the military did was lend a few tanks."
Our warrior hero in Kosovo
To: ewing
Wait a minute, does Weasly Clark think that the Dem's will vote for a retired general, even a Bill Clinton boot licking one?
Clark must be smoking some puffa-luffa-stuff.
30
posted on
02/06/2003 8:08:30 AM PST
by
csvset
To: ewing
No didn't see Washington Press Club, C-SPAM on the morning program to the (I think) Hill update spoke about Kerry and his find and then referenced that Clark too was finding ancestors.
To: roses of sharon
That any high-ranking military man could be a Democrat in this day and age is astounding. Clinton gutted the military and sent them all over the world and tried to make it into his own social playground. It is well known that the hard left is extremely anti-military.
To: Zack Nguyen
Clark was a politico-general 100%.
I served under him in the 1st Cav.
I won't go into details, just know that he's all about image and short on substance.
To: carmelanne
Clark was involved in Waco?
34
posted on
02/06/2003 9:22:24 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
I believe Clark. I think he's angling to be VP. Edwards will be the nominee, and Clark will chaperon him.
To: OldCorps
Yep. While he was CG of 1st Cav, we called him "Weasely" Clark. He was a classmate of my father's at Command and General Staff College, and was evidently just as big a narcissistic, political suck a** then as he was when serving under Klinton, and as he remains today. He's a heap big loser.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
36
posted on
02/06/2003 11:17:45 AM PST
by
wku man
To: ewing
I also worked for Wesley Clark in the early 90's. At that time his nickname was "the Prince of Darkness". He is not a "people person", nor is he independently wealthy (hint: he's probably campaigning for Vice President). He was known to have used and stepped on many people during his meteoric rise to NATO Commander. Rumor has it he barely escaped a "fragging" in Vietnam.
To: ewing
If anyone should be standing trial in the Hague, it's Clark.
38
posted on
02/06/2003 11:21:00 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
I agree whole heartedly. Bombing innocent civilians indescriminately is a war crime. He AND the pig, Maddy Albright should be turned over to the Hague.
39
posted on
02/06/2003 11:49:25 AM PST
by
OldCorps
To: Stopislamnow
My husband served with him in Vietnam.
40
posted on
02/06/2003 11:50:41 AM PST
by
FryingPan101
(Go away, Wesley!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson