Posted on 02/01/2003 10:57:22 AM PST by vannrox
Not to be picky, but hate crimes is now one of the three most important crimes in Britian??
One, who defines hate crimes? The British people or the EU?
Two, What about little things like armed robbery, assault, kidnapping, bank robbery, treason and terrorist activities?
Oh, I forgot. The police are too busy sniffing the exhaust fumes of autos to see if the owners are guilty of tax evasion by using used cooking oil instead of state approved motor oils.
What a crock. Bring Tony over here, with pleasure. GB no longer deserves him, eccentric or not.
A_R
It was announced that the Metropolitan police will henceforth be saving their manpower for the three most important offences in the country: Murder, rape and hate crimes.
How long before even rape is no longer considered worth a police investigation? We are rapidly heading in the direction of South Africa.
Note the extreme importance that the above statement puts on "hate crimes": in other words, thought crimes. The police are in fact, nothing more now than political police, enforcing unpopular laws against a hostile and helpless population, at the behest of distant and unresponsive elites, who care more for illegal immigrants and criminals than they do for their law abiding (but poorer) fellow countrymen.
This "hate crime" lunacy has gotten so bad, that British police actually are now sending undercover cops into restaurants to listen for people making racial remarks and other "hate speech" - by which, of course, they mean white people. Black, asian, or muslim hate speech is just fine and dandy. But if you are white and let slip a racial remark in Britain, it's off to jail for you (or, at any rate, off to court).
People who deny that we are headed towards a police state need to read stuff like this, and wake up and smell the coffee.
Hey, burglars gotta eat too ya know!
It will not be too long now before the only "crime" which will concern the police are "hate crimes". The job of the political police is to ensure that the current ruling elites remain in power; these elites have dictated the imposition of a multiracial society against the express wishes of the native population. As things get worse, and the unworkable multiracialist society falls apart, the elites are going to take out their anger on the only people it is still safe to oppress: law abiding, ordinary white, native, tax paying peons - the new serfs of the feudal multiracialist empire.
Of, BTW, it is no accident that Tone Blare is Bush Jr.'s personal lapdog, and is all rah-rah over the impending war. Tone Blare is pushing for this war, in spite of opposition to it within his own party, because it further justifies whatever "emergency measures" he choses to take, further eliminating whatever civil rights may remain.
And since the "war on terror" will never end, because there is no way to measure victory, the elimination of constitutional and civil rights will be de facto a permanent elimination, not just a temporary one.
Natural justice was once again thwarted when Martin was found guilty of murder. He has now served two and one-half years and he came up before the Parole Board two weeks ago. But he was refused parole because he has failed to show remorse. He refuses to go along with the thought police. He still thinks he had a right to protect himself and his property.
That he has shown no remorse led the Orwellian Parole Board to refuse him freedom on the grounds that he poses a "threat to burglars." At the same hearing, authorities cited another damning cause for refusal of parole: "He tends to think things were better 50 years ago."
Note to Brits who might believe they have a right to defend themselves: After you get done shooting the animal invading your home, reload. More enemies are on their way.
This can and will happen here if we allow "sensible" "common sense" "in good faith" "modern" "gun control" to advance.
Who are these authorities? Reno and Mugabe? Progressives, ungrateful and ignorant people.
Why haven't the British run the fascists who created these laws into the ocean yet?
Why haven't we (Americans), either?
And why do conservatives mouth and parrot left-wing rhetoric by calling these people "fascists"? No fascist government ever did anything so loony as this. Fascism is at worst a negative reaction against, and partial immitation of, socialism/communism.
Call these people commies or Bolsheviks; it's what they are, in spirit; if they were really fascists, that would actually constitute a partial reformation of their otherwise unredeemably bad character.
That sure is a nice lookin' flowerbed you got there, Tony! What kinda fertilizer you use?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.