Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oklahoman Editorial: Gimmicks Aren't Focus of Stimulus Plan
The Daily Oklahoman ^ | 24 January 2003 | Oklahoman Editorial Writer

Posted on 01/25/2003 9:08:59 AM PST by PhiKapMom

Oklahoman Editorial: Gimmicks Aren't Focus of Stimulus Plan

2003-01-25

CONGRESSIONAL Democrats who oppose President Bush's economic stimulus proposal are taking aim at the plan's feature elements: ending double taxation of corporate dividends and speeding up marginal tax rate reductions passed by Congress in 2001. The rhetoric is fairly typical of the anti-tax cut crowd, that tax cuts favor the rich. They also say the president's proposal doesn't provide immediate economic stimulus like their plan to give one-time, refundable rebates of $300 to every American.

On both counts, they miss the point.

First, the economy isn't nearly as bad off as some make it out to be. Commerce Secretary Don Evans notes that current distress is mostly localized in the stock market, that productivity is up and inflation is under control.

As for stimulus, the term is a misnomer if you're talking about government's role in a multitrillion-dollar economy.

The object is sustainable economic growth, the enabling of the U.S. economy so it can create jobs. Tax-and-spend policies in Washington are tempting in the short term to goose lagging economic indicators, but they consume available capital without producing anything approaching the economic benefits produced by the private sector.

An analysis of the Bush proposal and the Democrats' alternative by the Washington-based Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation (IRET) says the president's plan would "push the economy's growth buttons."

Bush's plan would end the double taxation of corporate dividends by eliminating the tax at the shareholder level. Venerable economist Milton Friedman says this would end corporations' "present bias toward retaining earnings rather than distributing them as dividends." The result, he says, will be a "more effective distribution of capital ..."

Marginal rate reductions that were due to go into effect next year and in 2006 would become effective immediately, retroactive to Jan. 1 of this year. Top tax brackets would fall to 25, 28, 33 and 35 percent, respectively. Permanent cuts to marginal rates have obvious benefits for owners of small businesses planning for the future.

Critics say these major tax cuts wouldn't put money in people's pockets quickly enough to help the economy, but, again, they miss the point.

Tax cuts help the economy in a broader sense if they make it more rewarding, after taxes, for Americans to work an extra hour, save an extra dollar or add an additional machine or building to their stock of capital, writes IRET's Stephen J. Entin.

"Many critics of the policy focus on who gets the money and what their income levels are," Entin writes. "That has nothing to do with the economic benefits of the tax relief, nor is the 'distribution' of the relief 'unfair,' since this is double taxation to begin with."

The Democrats' rebate proposal is temporary and minuscule compared to the size of the economy. The handouts would mostly be saved, Entin says, and there is "nothing in the rebates that reward people for additional work, saving or investment."

So a big battle looms in Congress. Americans should not let class warfare rhetoric sap their support for Bush's policies, which are aimed at job creation and sustained economic growth, not temporary gimmicks.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: bushgrowth; economicplan; ratsgimmicks
More common sense talk from The Daily Oklahoman!
1 posted on 01/25/2003 9:08:59 AM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog; Dog Gone; MeeknMing; deport; isthisnickcool; OKSooner; VOA; E.G.C.; Ole Okie; Howlin; ...
This is a short synopsis that compares the Administration's Economic Plan to make our Economy grow and the temporary gimmicks plan of the RATs!
2 posted on 01/25/2003 9:12:22 AM PST by PhiKapMom (Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Well, I imagine this will be a repeat of the first tax cut, when the President simply took the rebates and incocporated them into the program.

I like this common sense explanation. Too bad we don't have a Daily Oklahoman Network!

3 posted on 01/25/2003 9:18:18 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
current distress is mostly localized in the stock market, that productivity is up and inflation is under control.

The Daily Oklahoman is living back in the '70s.
Inflation isn't the concern. DEFLATION is.

The object is sustainable economic growth, the enabling of the U.S. economy so it can create jobs.

In the "new" economy, the "trickle down effect" that Dubya is relying on for his tax-cut stimulus is short circuited by his trade policies. The Trade Deficit will misdirect the stimulus to offshore nations such as Mexico, India and China. Americans will merely be buried in additional National Debt.

4 posted on 01/25/2003 9:26:32 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Bush isn't interested in gimmicks. He's interested in fundamental change with long-term benefits to the country.

He actually wants to make things better, as opposed to the Democrats who use gimmicks all the time.

5 posted on 01/25/2003 9:32:44 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

6 posted on 01/25/2003 11:13:15 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (9 out of 10 Republicans agree: Bush IS a Genius !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
BTTT!!!!!
7 posted on 01/25/2003 11:47:57 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
wonderful editorial
8 posted on 01/25/2003 12:21:18 PM PST by rwfromkansas (What is the chief end of man? To glorify God and enjoy Him forever. --- Westminster Catechism Q1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
That's how I looked at it too -- Common sense explanation!
9 posted on 01/25/2003 5:44:08 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I loved it when they called it gimmicks! Would love to have this appear in every paper in America but I know I am dreaming!
10 posted on 01/25/2003 5:45:09 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The Daily Oklahoman is living back in the '70s.

The whole state is just now emerging from the ‘50s.

11 posted on 01/25/2003 8:36:48 PM PST by guitar Josh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh
Uh huh, kicking and screaming all the way! Thank God!
12 posted on 02/02/2003 3:53:35 PM PST by tal hajus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson