Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Virginia GOP Chief Accused of Eavesdropping
The Associated Press ^ | JANUARY 23, 2003

Posted on 01/23/2003 2:49:24 PM PST by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — The former executive director of Virginia's Republican Party was indicted Thursday on federal charges he eavesdropped on conference calls among Democratic legislators last year.

Edmund A. Matricardi III, 34, was accused of using a telephone number and access codes to listen in on the teleconferences.

He was charged with five counts involving the interception of electronic communications. Each count carries up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Matricardi resigned over the scandal but was later hired as operations director of the South Carolina Republican Party. On Thursday, after he was indicted, he resigned that post, too.

His attorney, Steven Benjamin, criticized the timing of the indictment. He said he had asked prosecutors to hold off on any charges until after the Virginia General Assembly had adjourned Feb. 22. He said any legal proceedings would probably require legislators to testify.

Matricardi was indicted in April on state charges, but the charges were dropped when state and local authorities asked federal investigators to take over the case.

Claudia Tucker, a former aide to the state House speaker, pleaded guilty in federal court Wednesday to a misdemeanor charge in the case and was sentenced to a year of probation and fined $1,000. She was accused of secretly listening to 22 minutes of a Democratic conference call over legislative redistricting.

Prosecutors said Matricardi used his telephone at state GOP headquarters and a telephone number and access code he had been given by a former Democratic Party staffer to call into an interstate conference call of the Joint Democratic Caucus last March.

``Without disclosing he was on the line, he secretly listened for approximately 2 1/2 hours and recorded the call on a tape recorder,'' U.S. Attorney Paul McNulty said.

The indictment said Matricardi disclosed the contents of the call the next day to an official in the office of Republican Attorney General Jerry Kilgore, who alerted the Virginia State Police.

Two days later, Matricardi allegedly eavesdropped on an interstate conference call of state Democrats for about two hours.

Former Democratic Party field director Jacquelyn Daniel has told reporters that she gave Matricardi the phone number and access codes after losing her party job during a reorganization.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: kilgore; matricardi; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/23/2003 2:49:24 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
If he did these things, and Kilgore knew about it, and it continued even after the AG was alerted, then this guy should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But Kilgore is such a namby pamby, and he alerted the police. Then what fell through the cracks?
2 posted on 01/23/2003 2:54:48 PM PST by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I seem to remember an old couple from Fort White, Florida,
who eavesdropped on Newt Gingrich and company in a very
similar way several years ago. Just happened to have the
necessary equipment and tape recorder in their car. In
their case it was all just accidental though. No malice of
forethought, you understand?
3 posted on 01/23/2003 2:55:08 PM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Sooooo ... the dems were really betrayed by one of their own ...??? Interesting!
4 posted on 01/23/2003 2:56:46 PM PST by CyberAnt (Syracuse where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davisfh
You're right! And eavesdropped, as I recall, in a very peculiar way...coached, it seemed, by a Democrat member of the House from Florida. As soon as someone pointed out that such eavesdropping was illegal, the couple, and the Florida congressman, dropped off the radar scope, along with the story.
5 posted on 01/23/2003 2:57:53 PM PST by My2Cents ("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Prosecutors said Matricardi used his telephone at state GOP headquarters and a telephone number and access code he had been given by a former Democratic Party staffer to call into an interstate conference call of the Joint Democratic Caucus last March.

Just out of curiousity, why is this considered illegal? It's hardly a wiretap, or a bug placed in someone's office.

6 posted on 01/23/2003 3:00:06 PM PST by My2Cents ("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davisfh
You're right, and don't forget the whitehaired Congressman (Dodd) who gave them permission. I know that Republicans are held to a higher standard, and maybe someday it will pay off.
7 posted on 01/23/2003 3:00:10 PM PST by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Now, somebody remind me of how Tom Harkin's eavesdropping case of his opponents strategy session was resolved?

From what I remembered, he blamed an aide, fired his campaign manager, gave the Wellstone Memorial Eulogy to rehabilitate his image, then won back his Senate seat.

Were charges ever filed?

-PJ

8 posted on 01/23/2003 3:01:22 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons
I know that Republicans are held to a higher standard, and maybe someday it will pay off.

Back in the cobwebs of my FReeper memory, I can vaguely recall a thread where several people had gained access to some kind of 'Rat conference call. The thread was chock-full of adolescent suggestions to make belching noises and other organic sounds, etc. (you can imagine). Anyway, I don't think it was the situtation mentioned in this article since my fuzzy recollection places it a least a couple years prior to this. I could be wrong, but perhaps another "old-timer" can help us out.

9 posted on 01/23/2003 3:11:58 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
October 18, 2000 - Gore Conference Call NOW
10 posted on 01/23/2003 3:21:10 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: davisfh
I seem to remember an old couple from Fort White, Florida, who eavesdropped on Newt Gingrich and company in a very similar way several years ago.

I don't for one minute believe that this couple had anything to do with the taping of Gingrich. I do believe, however, that government resources were used to make these recordings, which would fit in perfectly with the Clintonian abuses of power that took place during the 90's. It was just another method used to intimidate the Republicans, like the FBI files that were acquired by "accident".

11 posted on 01/23/2003 3:24:48 PM PST by Major Matt Mason (Whose blood pressure rises at the thought of the Clintons lawless ways.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Thanks HAL!!!
12 posted on 01/23/2003 3:43:20 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
In CA its illegal to tape phone conversations without the other parties knowledge.
13 posted on 01/23/2003 3:49:18 PM PST by ibbryn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
In some jurisdictions, it is necessary for only a single party to a conversation to give consent to record it. In others, both (or all) parties must give consent. It is not clear whether a tortured definition of "party to a conversation" might apply here (my guess is that it would not). As for which jurisdiction's rules were in order, there's not enough info for me to comment.
14 posted on 01/23/2003 4:28:53 PM PST by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons; Mudboy Slim; Corin Stormhands; sultan88; jla; P8riot
But Kilgore is such a namby pamby, and he alerted the police.

This statement makes it sound like Kilgore shouldn't have turned in someone accused of suspicious activity. Kilgore, as Attorney General, had no choice but to do what he did. If Matricardi is innocent, then he would have been exonerated. Otherwise, Kilgore would be accused of a cover-up. Kilgore is the most conservative statewide elected official we've had in Virginia in recent memory in addition to being a straight arrow. That's a winning combinatin in my book.

15 posted on 01/23/2003 4:36:56 PM PST by Ligeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ligeia
"Kilgore is the most conservative statewide elected official we've had in Virginia in recent memory in addition to being a straight arrow. That's a winning combinatin in my book."

Amen to that! Jerry Kilgore will be the next great governor of Virginia!

16 posted on 01/23/2003 4:44:04 PM PST by sultan88 (Kilgore '05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ligeia
He did the right thing. I was born a Virginian, know the politics, and wasn't saying that Kilgore should not have reported this. My problem was how long it took to be revealed. Also, Kilgore is a nice and upright man, but too kind by far for VA politics.
17 posted on 01/23/2003 4:45:45 PM PST by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons; Mudboy Slim
My problem was how long it took to be revealed.

When this happened last year, I'm pretty sure it was in the news within hours and Matricardi was out at the RPV in less than a week.

IIRC, the state charges were dismissed. These are the federal charges that apparently have just been filed.

Kilgore didn't sit on anything.

18 posted on 01/23/2003 4:53:04 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
I stand corrected.
19 posted on 01/23/2003 4:54:18 PM PST by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Just out of curiousity, why is this considered illegal?

My memory is fuzzy, but I think that's why the state charges were dismissed. What Matricardi did was unethical and stupid, but I don't know if they can make these charges stick.

It wasn't a wiretap. He was listening in on a call to which he had been given access.

20 posted on 01/23/2003 4:54:58 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson