Skip to comments.
U.N. ‘PERV': LEAK RUINED MY IRAQ PEACE MISSION
New York Post ^
| 1/23/03
| ADAM MILLER and MARSHA KRANES
Posted on 01/23/2003 1:16:18 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:11:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: kattracks
Scotty reminds me of 'Chester the Molester'. heh heh
Nam Vet
21
posted on
01/23/2003 2:18:33 AM PST
by
Nam Vet
(Rooting for 'Big Al Sharpton', Savior of the Dims.)
To: kattracks
22
posted on
01/23/2003 2:19:52 AM PST
by
prisoner6
( I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered! I am a FREE MAN!)
To: this_ol_patriot
Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if they had a VHS of Ritter in flagrante delicto. Not necessarily with a girl, either--what's the old Middle-Eastern saying? "A woman for children, a boy for pleasure."
23
posted on
01/23/2003 2:20:46 AM PST
by
Calico Cat
(the simplest solution is usually the correct one)
To: billclintonwillrotinhell
"He's blaming whoever leaked the information."He concedes that this is a leak, therefore conceding that this is in the court record. Otherwise, he would be calling it all a fabrication and he has been careful not to do that. Nonetheless he refuses to admit to it -- and yet he stops short of any claim that he's being slandered/libeled, for if he did that the original news sources could challenge him to settle the matter in court where people and documents would be subpoenaed. This is the last thing he wants, so he continues to evade and looks worse and worse, solidifying the public impression that he did exactly what he's reputed to have done and is still lying about it, just as he lied when he initially denied that the Ritter in question was him.
To: prisoner6
"Ritter is scum."Well put, p6. Wish I had your eloquence. :-)
To: kattracks
If his "peace" message were that honest, then anyone could tell it.
If he were on the "other side" of the issue and supporting military action against Iraq then he might be in posession of special information he's seen regarding WMD.
He supposedly turned on the issue because he felt he was being used to spy on Iraq. That does nothing to support the position that they don't have WMD.
26
posted on
01/23/2003 2:32:42 AM PST
by
weegee
To: kattracks
Why doesn't he just go on to Iraq anyway? He could lead the human shields in a Jerk-off for Peace. At the Baghdad Burger King. Think of the sybolism.
To: EternalVigilance
He's just mad cause Saddam promised him girls this trip to go along with the money.That would explain a lot, wouldn't it? I imagine Saddam caught him on film. I also imagine that female minors were in his movie.
To: Bonaparte
At the same time, are we seeing Bill Clinton in reverse here? For all the right reasons, exposing secret info about someone. But such a tactic could be abused when future presidents are elected.
To: Calico Cat
I think it was sweet-and-sour. Money on the one hand, and sex films on the other.
To: kattracks
"Because of what happened here . . . Im not on that airplane," he said.Bllsht. No one stopped him from getting on the plane to SaddamLand. Where Saddam just may be rewarding him with access to teeny boppers. Harams are big in Araby.
31
posted on
01/23/2003 2:47:35 AM PST
by
dennisw
(http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: kattracks
The New York Post reports: "
[T]he charge...stemmed from an attempt to lure a 16-year- old he met on the Internet to a Burger King so she could watch him masturbate"
And in other news of the day...
AP, January 23, 2003 -- Anonymous sources close to Scott Ritter have reported today that, despite their many weeks of intense, and sometimes acrimonious marriage counseling, Scott Ritter and his right hand are now considering a trial separation. Privately, these sources tell us that Scott has been complaining for months now that his hand has been faking orgasm. Mean while, close friends of Scott's hand have confided the hand's tearful explanation, "What do you expect? He makes me wear a latex glove. I'm his hand, for crying out loud, not some cheap floozy!"
Reached for comment, Scott Ritter charged, "This story was intentionally leaked to sabotage my planned peace mission to Iraq. Whose going to want to shake hands with me now?"
Who, indeed, Scotty!
--Boot Hill
32
posted on
01/23/2003 2:59:02 AM PST
by
Boot Hill
(Ctrl) (Alt) (del)
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: Badabing Badaboom
LOL, what a disgusting notion.
34
posted on
01/23/2003 4:50:47 AM PST
by
Monty22
To: Calico Cat
The literal translation from Arabic is actually..."A woman for duty, a young boy for pleasure and a melon for sheerest delight".
But, hey, a scrote...is a scrote...is a scrote, in any language!
35
posted on
01/23/2003 5:04:50 AM PST
by
Selous
To: kattracks
"Because of what happened here . . . Im not on that airplane," he said. ...because of what happen then you should be in prison, Mr Ritter.
36
posted on
01/23/2003 5:06:50 AM PST
by
mware
To: kattracks
if only the Post had this on the headlines.
UN PERV'S PAST CYBER SEX ARREST
37
posted on
01/23/2003 9:09:59 AM PST
by
finnman69
(Bush Cheney 2004)
To: kattracks
Why would Ritter need to advise Iraq on how to avoid war? They have already been told how: come clean on the WMD's. Which they have completely ignored.
38
posted on
01/23/2003 9:10:29 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave!)
To: dennisw
Perv: "Because of what happened here . . . Im not on that airplane," he said.
You: Bllsht. No one stopped him from getting on the plane to SaddamLand. Where Saddam just may be rewarding him with access to teeny boppers. Harams are big in Araby.
Actually, I have to agree with the perv's assessment. Because of this leak, he isn't on a plane to Baghdad...now that the truth is out, he's no longer useful to Saddam.
39
posted on
01/23/2003 9:45:48 AM PST
by
pgyanke
(Blackmail is only good when you have the goods...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson