To: All
2 posted on
01/23/2003 12:19:28 AM PST by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: JohnHuang2
was supposed to be on an airplane yesterday flying to Baghdad on a personal initiative that could have had great ramifications in regards to issues of war and peace So, now he thinks he's the next Jesse Jackson or Jimmah Cahter!!! ROFL!
To: JohnHuang2
"I was a very effective voice in the anti-war effort in the campaign to keep inspectors on the ground."I noticed this quote before on the original Aaron Brown interview thread. And now it is "official" in this transcript. Ritter said, "I was a very effective voice...."
I think he realizes, even if only subconsciously, that he is done.
To: JohnHuang2
The only foundation of lies I see here is the one that Ritter is trying to build to justify his bizarre anti-Bush administration bias. Ritter obviously does not have a clue how untrustworthy, smug, shallow and bigoted he comes across.
To: JohnHuang2
The country is swamped by 15-16 year old "will you be my daddy?" tramps. And Ritter couldn't get one? Further, who hasn't read/ seen every perv get cought by some cop, eating a donut, faking being a some fatasy hottie that would just love to see a cubby, glasses wearing bad haircut man, squeezing one off in a public place. But Ritter, falls for it.
Perved, stupid and arrogant is no way to go through life.
6 posted on
01/23/2003 1:20:42 AM PST by
Leisler
To: JohnHuang2
I was a very effective voice in the anti-war effort in the campaign to keep inspectors on the ground. An open admission by a leading opponent of the war, and a friend of Saddam, that the presence of the 'inspectors' is for the purpose of preventing the war---not the stated purpose, which is to give Saddam a chance to comply.
Huge admission. Huge.
To: JohnHuang2
Look! In the Burger King restroom, it's Ritterman!
8 posted on
01/23/2003 1:35:46 AM PST by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber!)
To: JohnHuang2
"Though network news coverage of the case has been scant, Ritter has been mentioned on Rush Limbaugh's radio program, heard on over 600 stations." I bet it wouldn't be scant if Ritter was a pro-war 'Pubbie.
To: JohnHuang2
Does any one on this board know why Ritter is a celebrity?
Once upon a time he was an inspector. A low level employee. Then he quit. Then after an infusion of cash, he become an apologist for Saddam. Now he's an admitted pedophile. What's next? Eloping with Britney Spears? Then becoming a famous pop star. Getting aids by sharing a needle. But then recovering, and doing a best-selling book and movie on his recovery. Before being run over by a pie wagon. And then forgotten.
To: JohnHuang2
..two months later, the source told the paper, Ritter was caught in the same kind of sex sting....Incredible. While under investigation by the FBI, gets busted and released for something that would destroy any value he has to the side he represents, and then does it again just two months later.
Either Ritter has some sort of self destructive disorder, Munchausen's Syndrome, or..........
To: JohnHuang2
Based on my own experiences in court (I am a lawyer, not a pervert) and based on the news reports, Ritter's lying when he says "the case was dismissed and therefore I have the presumption of innocence." There's more to it than that.
What really happened is that the case was continued for six months while he went to court-ordered sex offender counseling, and then the case was dismissed on good behavior.
Which means either he plead guilty or, more likely, he made an Alford plea (no contest, nolo contendere, stipulation that there is sufficient evidence to find him guilty without an admission of guilt). Based on that and what the prosecutor told him, the judge made a finding of guilt but agreed to dismiss the case if Ritter went to counseling. Courts do not have the legal power to order an innocent man to go to counseling.
Legally, Ritter's not entitled to the presumption of innocence. He's blowing smoke, but that's nothing new.
I think it's disgusting that the file was sealed. Here in Virginia you couldn't do it unless there was a real minor involved, not a cop pretending to be a minor.
To: JohnHuang2
". . . as far as everyone should be concerned, this is a dead issue." But, what about mother's of teenage daughters in your neighborhood? Just because YOU say so, pervert Ritter, THEY should not be concerned, either?
30 posted on
01/23/2003 9:59:14 AM PST by
nicmarlo
(10 out of 10 Republicans agree: Byrd IS a Liar)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson