Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Choosing Battles Wisely (Check your Congressman's position on the drug war) Cornell Review
Cornell Review ^ | 1/20/2003 | Sara Townsley

Posted on 01/19/2003 10:24:15 PM PST by TLBSHOW

Choosing Battles Wisely

When I was in high school, I remember cute little Nancy Reagan, with her cute little yappie dog, telling me to "Just Say No." I remember howling with my friends over the "this is your brain on drugs" commercial. These ads only confirmed what we already knew: adults are idiots. Reinforcing my teenage skepticism, now the Office of Drug Control Policy is pushing the link between recreational drug use and terrorism.

I'm especially fond of the commercial that has a child narrating something like, "this is the joint that Joe bought just to have some fun, and this is the dealer where he bought the marijuana, and this is the smuggler that supplies the dealer, and this is the cartel kingpin that supplies the smugglers and collects Joe's money to fund terrorism against Americans." Of course, being just a child, he leaves out the last part, which is "and this is the government that makes the whole thing profitable for the cartel kingpin by creating a black market for products for which there will always be a demand." The poor kid probably doesn't know any better, but once he learns about the link between crime and Prohibition in history class, and once he starts driving to the next state to buy cigarettes for half the price, maybe he'll see better how it really works.

It's the simple concept of supply and demand. Whether or not you believe that using them is a good idea, like alcohol and cigarettes, there will always be a demand for drugs. And where there is a demand, savvy suppliers will find a way to meet it. Like any other product, the costs of producing and delivering the product will be reflected in the price. In the case of drugs, the most significant costs are the risks of prosecution, seizure of assets, and competitors, already operating outside the law with little reluctance to employ force to preserve and expand their markets. These are significant risks, thus prices are high. But high risk, if evaded, also translates to high profit, and thus more money to fund terrorism.

All of these risks, and hence the profits, are created by drug laws. All of them would be eliminated if drug laws were repealed. With virtually no risk associated with production and delivery – not to mention a small but guaranteed market – prices drop, quality improves, and drug-related violence evaporates. And terrorists, accustomed to criminal profit margins, will not adapt to the role of legitimate businessmen, even if drug production were to remain wholly unregulated, an unlikely scenario.

So what are we waiting for? Why do we spend billions on what we know to be an exercise in futility? The drug warriors sound like the anti-war types. Let's rely on diplomacy with Iraq. Let's give it time. Let's pass more resolutions. Let's do this or that to try to get Saddam to do something we know he'll never do. Like those opposed to war in Iraq, the drug warriors need to face reality. We keep doing what we've been doing and we keep getting what we got. We gave peace a chance.

Thus, a fundamental shift in the approach is required to solve the problem. First, we need to set idealism aside and accept that a complete and total solution for all time is unachievable. War with Iraq will not eliminate terrorism. But it will cut off sources of funding and supplies for terrorists. It will ensure that the most ruthless, megalomaniacal, anti-West dictator can't point a nuke at us. It will lift the shadow of oppression from the Iraqi people and end economic sanctions. Likewise, legalizing drugs won't eliminate drug use. But it will radically reduce the dangers of using them, by making producers accountable for quality. It will radically reduce the violence that results from protecting markets and enforcing agreements. And it will dry up the huge profit margins that may, in part, fund terrorism.

So Joe-recreational-drug-user, you may still want to think twice about buying drugs. The fact that it's the government's fault doesn't change where the money goes. But do not assume responsibility for the system that makes it all possible: that lies at the feet of the government. If you want to do your part to combat terrorism, check your Congressman's position on the drug war. If he supports it, vote for someone else in the next election. Do not allow yourself to be manipulated by advertising paid for by the same government that created the problem.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: congressman; drugs; tlbshow4allsides; tlbshowflipflops; tlbshowhasnoclue; tlbshowstands4notta; toddfalls4everything; wodlist

1 posted on 01/19/2003 10:24:16 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
There's no need to be mean spirited !

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/19/2003 10:26:08 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Wod_list
bump
3 posted on 01/19/2003 10:28:40 PM PST by The Obstinate Insomniac (Oppose Constitutional Verbicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Obstinate Insomniac
So we know her a little better!

Sara Townsley is a graduate student in the Field of Biochemistry, Cell, and Molecular Biology at Cornell University. She resisted the prevailing left-wing orthodoxy while earning a B.A. in sociology at the University of Illinois, and joyfully discovered strict constructionism while earning a J.D. at Tulane University. A member of the California State Bar, she attained the rank of captain during her three and a half years of service in the U.S. Army JAG Corps. Stationed in Europe, she also taught business law at the University of Maryland overseas, and completed a second bachelor's degree in chemistry and biology. Ms. Townsley is currently indulging her life-long love of science, and enjoys being a news junkie and spouting off about politics. She is a conservative libertarian (with a little "l") but votes Republican in close races.
4 posted on 01/19/2003 10:30:36 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Not only end the Drug War, but release the non-violent prisoners incarcerated for drugs as well. We'd save one hell of a lot of money by letting the POWs out. (Of course the prison guards unions wouldn't like that idea.) An added benefit would be that the 4th Amendment might be restored as well.
5 posted on 01/20/2003 12:44:18 AM PST by 11B3 (Deport the Democrats and Greens to North Korea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
Open the prisons and let the rapists and pedophiles out as well then I guess. Let the whole world just go to sh!t.
6 posted on 01/20/2003 1:21:20 AM PST by A CA Guy (Libertarians : The party of illegal drugs...I guess!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
GREAT ARTICLE!!!

The drug warriors sound like the anti-war types.

This point CANNOT BE MADE ENOUGH. The Holy Drug Warriors, with their utopian fantasy of a "drug-free America", are blood brothers of the hate-America Left in their love of socialism and hatred of individual liberty and personal responsibility.

7 posted on 01/20/2003 5:32:58 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Open the prisons and let the rapists and pedophiles out as well then I guess.

Listen, genius, this strawman has been knocked down over and over on the drug-war threads. Rape and pedophilia are actual crimes with victims -- drug users hurt no one but themselves.

Buy a clue and share it with your drug-warrior buddies!

8 posted on 01/20/2003 5:35:50 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Ms. Townsley is currently indulging her life-long love of science, and enjoys being a news junkie and spouting off about politics. She is a conservative libertarian (with a little "l") but votes Republican in close races.

Sounds like she'd enjoy being a FReeper!

Maye she'll do a search for her article and find us.

9 posted on 01/20/2003 6:00:31 AM PST by alley cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bassmaner
"drug users hurt no one but themselves."

Asinine statement, I need not respond. This speaks for itself in so many ways.
10 posted on 01/20/2003 8:26:57 AM PST by A CA Guy (Take away responsibility and common sense and you are left with an illegal drug user or liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
"drug users hurt no one but themselves."

>>Asinine statement, I need not respond. This speaks for itself in so many ways.<<

Actually 90% of drug users don't hurt anyone, not even themselves. It is only about 10% of drug users who have trouble with drugs. Just about the same percentage of users of alcohol have trouble also.

What you really have to ask yourself is how is the drug war benefiting me? Do you apreciate:

Higher taxes to pay for it
No evidence that the war is reducing drug usage.
Corrupt cops, selling drugs and stealing drug money.
No-knock raids that often kill innocents
Routine gunfights in some neighborhoods over turf.
Innocents killed in the turf crossfire.
A gang problem estimated to be 90% drug profit fueled.
Burglars who rob you to pay black market prices.
Carjackers who do the same
Pushers on campus who would not be there if drugs were legal. (any alcohol pushers on campus?)
600,000 Americans who are "NOT" paying taxes as they sit in prison at your expense... $30,000 per year each.
Non-corrupt police who are tied up arresting druggies, leaving little time to protect your family from real predators.

How do you benefit from the drug war anyway?





11 posted on 01/20/2003 11:36:55 PM PST by LloydofDSS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LloydofDSS
No evidence that putting rapist in jail reduces rape either by your logic!

Gee we should ignore all form of reason and logic, we should listen to you and just empty the jails.

We would start by releasing all the violent drug abusers first!

Hey LloydofDSS, can they send the first trial releases to stay at your home? Didn't think so. :)
12 posted on 01/21/2003 12:16:34 AM PST by A CA Guy (Libertarian Drug Pledge: One Nation Under Drugs, unintelligible with Anarchy and Vice for all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson