Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I apologize to every Freeper for posting this trash.

E-mail AP

1 posted on 01/12/2003 3:45:59 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth; Tailgunner Joe; MeeknMing; Mudboy Slim; PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; Mia T; Alamo-Girl
"Let me be clear. Only the president and the executive branch can speak for the United States." - Secretary of State Madeline Albright, Jan. 2000

http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0200helms.htm


2 posted on 01/12/2003 3:51:42 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
What trash. I'll give it points for consistancy, though. It starts out as trash, transitions into trash, and ends as trash, creating the perfect intellectual landfill atmosphere that we have come to expect from AP.
4 posted on 01/12/2003 4:01:55 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

I don't see this as being too trashy. It seems to me the Clinton-era officials come off sounding pretty lame.

The reporter makes it clear that the North Koreans were building bombs even as Albright was smiling for the cameras with Dear Leader Kim. She looks like an absolute fool now.

In response to this, the one guy says the real purpose of Albright's visit had to do with missiles (as though they stopped those), and the next one says that without missiles, the bombs aren't much good. That's just lame. In light of the fact that the Nokors built the missiles too (and shot one over Japan while Clinton was still president), their whole act just sounds stupid.

It's clear from this article that the Clinton foreign policy team got snookered. The Nokors were building bombs and missiles, and Clinton was pretending that he and Jimmy Carter had solved the problem. Now the Clinton guys have the nerve to say that they have "serious problems" with how the Bush Administration is handling this? It is to laugh.

I don't buy for a minute that the military option has been taken off the table. Powell is entirely too obvious about saying "nice doggie" in this case. He and Bush are both walking very softly here. I smell a Big Stick coming. Powell can afford to be nonchalant about what Kim might do in three months because he knows that Kim isn't going to be there in three months. There is no way Bush is going to let that guy get his hands on 30 or 40 nuclear weapons. No frigging way.


7 posted on 01/12/2003 4:38:51 PM PST by Nick Danger (Kim Jong Il: the other dead meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gael
MadCow ping
9 posted on 01/12/2003 5:10:37 PM PST by wonders (It's a cleaning lady... it's a troll... it's a...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
All one can say about the Clinton era is... it showed us that if you are going to lie, why not lie about everything, to cover up anything from foolish sexual indiscretions to outright federal crimes. While you are at it, why not even deny that you did or did not do certain things, long after the fact, regardless of whether there are obvious, verifiable, thoroughly documented, and irrefutable facts to the contrary? If you are going to lie, why hold back? The 90's truly almost did see the death of the "truth". What Clinton's very lame and pathetic apologists fail to realize is that George Bush is not Clinton. He is nothing like Clinton. And so they cannot pin Clinton's crimes and failures on George W. Bush.
16 posted on 01/12/2003 8:41:41 PM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

17 posted on 01/12/2003 9:24:00 PM PST by MamaLucci (Patty Murray can kiss my white Irish American a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
LINKS OF INTEREST:

***NEWS4COLORADO.com: "NORTH KOREA CALLS FOR 'HOLY WAR' AGAINST U.S." (January 11, 2003)

***WASHINGTON TIMES.com: "IRAQ URGES ARABS TO FOLLOW NORTH KOREA" (010203)

NewsMax.com: "NORTH KOREA NUKES CLINTON LEGACY" by Charles R. Smith (010803)

FREE CONGRESS.org - Notable News Now: "NEGLIGENCE: BILL CLINTON'S REAL LEGACY ON NATIONAL DEFENSE" -Commentary by Paul M. Weyrich (120502)

FrontPageMagazine.com (WALL STREET JOURNAL EDITORIAL): "PYONGYANG'S NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL" (010203)

NewsMax.com: HOT TOPICS: "NORTH KOREA"

YAHOO! News - Articles - Topic: "NORTH KOREA"

NORTH KOREA DAILY News Online

GLOAL SECURITY.org: YONGBYON [NYONGBYON]

IAEA.org - INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY: Press Releases



WorldNetDaily.com: "U.S. FIRMS HELPED CHINA WITH NUKES? State Accuses Hughes, Boeing of Providing Missile Technology" by Jon Dougherty (010203)

GertzFile.com

SoftWar.net

NewsMax.com: "Clinton Audio Exclusive: Pre-September 11 Bin Laden Strike Wouldn't Have Worked" (August 7, 2002)

stepping back in time....RPC.SENATE.GOV: "Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help Turn Bosnia Into Militant Islamic Base" (011697)

18 posted on 01/12/2003 9:56:38 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
-The Atomic Genie- what we know about North Korea's Nuclear program--
19 posted on 01/13/2003 2:38:44 AM PST by backhoe (Has that Clinton "legacy" made you feel safer yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson