Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear chief: No 'smoking gun' in Iraq [UN MORON ALERT]
CNN ^ | 01/06/2003 | CNN

Posted on 01/06/2003 4:39:46 PM PST by Publius Maximus

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:53 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The U.N. agency searching for evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq said Monday that so far it has not found evidence of one.

Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said inspectors have found no proof that Iraq lied about nuclear weapons in its declaration on weapons of mass destruction presented to the United Nations.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: inspectorclueso; iraq; unsucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Gotta wonder why W agreed to let these bozos do their thing...
1 posted on 01/06/2003 4:39:46 PM PST by Publius Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
Nuclear chief: No 'smoking gun' in Iraq

Attention UN moron... there will be no 'smoking gun'... only a mushroom cloud, most likely over Tel Aviv, Washington DC, and/or NYC.

2 posted on 01/06/2003 4:47:39 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
If this UN putz wants to see a few smoking guns (and smoking ruins), he should hang out there for another month or so.
3 posted on 01/06/2003 4:51:12 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Trust me, we won't need to find a smoking gun.

We'll be at war at the time of our choosing, and it will be their fault.

Self-Defense is a valid and legimate reason for going to war.

4 posted on 01/06/2003 4:51:16 PM PST by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
Thank you Colon Powill.
5 posted on 01/06/2003 5:06:22 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
Actually, if I were one of these inspectors I wouldn't act like anything was wrong until Iraq was far in the distance of my rear view mirror.
6 posted on 01/06/2003 5:06:51 PM PST by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said inspectors have found no proof that Iraq lied about nuclear weapons in its declaration on weapons of mass destruction presented to the United Nations.

Hmmmmmm

7 posted on 01/06/2003 5:09:28 PM PST by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
"Hopefully, Saddam Hussein will get the message that the world community, through the United Nations, has called on [him] to disarm

The only way he will get the message is when we start bombing and invading. Then he "might" get it!

8 posted on 01/06/2003 5:11:36 PM PST by dhfnc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
From your keyboard to the Almighty's ears. Unfortunately, we have many, many Leftists in the nation who need to have this spelled out... often... in large fonts... with a hip soundtrack.
9 posted on 01/06/2003 5:15:09 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I'll be sure to ping you when, after letting the UN declare that their is no nuke program, the administration humiliates and destroys UN credibility by then providing solid proof.

How are you so certain the administration is not giving the UN the rope to hang themselves, setting them up? Powell has a tough role to serve in within the administration, and he is serving our country well.
10 posted on 01/06/2003 5:15:25 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
only a mushroom cloud, most likely over Tel Aviv

Your point raises an interesting question. Given Israeli intelligence and given their past history with Saddam and anything nuclear, don't you think that Sharon would immediately dispatch any A-bomb building effort by Iraq as they did in 1981? The Arab world would fume and rant, but as in 1981, they would do nothing in terms of launching against Israel.

Israel is always our canary in the coal mine.

11 posted on 01/06/2003 5:18:20 PM PST by Archangelsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
"Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said inspectors have found no proof"

they lost me at the word where it starts out "Mohamed..."

I guess we ought to just nuke them all... they are NOT believable. They lie for each other, to submit the dhimmis to their false god... named allah by death or by enslavement.

Kofi is a muslim too. He is one of them. What muslim can render credibility to other muslims, verifying their own obedience to rules they do not support and have historically flouted with kofi's apparent approval? Sound confusing? "Trust ME" they say... "we are muslims and would never lie." Sorry, I just cannot do that. No matter how hard I try.

What muslims can be trusted in any responsible position, as their sole motivation for living, if they are a "true" muslim, is the emergence of islam as the world's dominant religion and the surpression of all other ideologies at the point of the sword, or the tip of an anthrax warhead?

They are murderors and bioweapons blackmailers.

NONE of them can be fully trusted. It's time we stopped trying to do the impossible.

12 posted on 01/06/2003 5:21:44 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
It's been an interesting exercise while we build up troop strength. The point of the exercise hasn't been Saddam or Iraq...but the U.N. itself. They are gonna look really inept when we end up having to lead them to what they missed. The endgame is to expose the U.N. appear as the useless, hopeless, and irrelevant organization that it is. I think we're getting closer to that point. In fact, have you noticed that even leftists in this country aren't criticizing W. for not taking up the N.Korea issue with the U.N.? Not even the nutcase in N. Korean is asking for U.N. involvement. Even he knows they're a joke.
13 posted on 01/06/2003 5:32:45 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus

The U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission

14 posted on 01/06/2003 5:35:43 PM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
I'll be sure to ping you when, after letting the UN declare that their is no nuke program, the administration humiliates and destroys UN credibility by then providing solid proof.

You and I might believe that proof, but we aren't the audience. Those who believe in bringing the US to heel won't drop that faith in the UN and will find reason to disbelieve that proof. They'll say that it was manufactured. Count on it.

I doubt that, even if the Administration provided solid proof, those others demanding a UN blessing would believe the evidence was credible (at least publicly). They'll howl that we need UN approval anyway and are acting as rogue nation. That's one probably reason Germany (Saddam's biggest supplier) now sits on the Security Council because they stand to give the howlers credibility and to deprive us of a unanimous vote. The propaganda would be useful to our enemies. I think most in the UN are making an attempt to entrap us with this game and would be delighted if Saddam succeeds in delivering a WMD to the US. It would help destroy the aura of invincibility and provide our enemies with both hope and more recruits. It would also put doubt into our protected "allies." Depriving us of UN approval would help strain our capabilities.

No, I think this is a very delicate situation and don't want to see the military get overextended. I also think that Powell has been a loose cannon. How are you so certain the administration is not giving the UN the rope to hang themselves, setting them up?

How are you certain that anybody outside the US and Britain cares?

15 posted on 01/06/2003 5:37:29 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
No 'smoking gun' in Iraq

Of course there's no smoking gun. You only get that after it has been fired. And we won't see that until 'mid February ;-)
16 posted on 01/06/2003 5:46:01 PM PST by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
Gotta wonder why W agreed to let these bozos do their thing...

To make the UN look foolish and IRRELEVENT. We've got the goods ready to spring when needed for world consumption (IMHO) and when our guys, already on the ground, have had a chance to work their magic, and when the rest of the boyz get in the theater, we'll go after them. When the rest of the muslim world realizes that the UN couldn't find squat, and the US has detailed photographs, informant info, surveillence tapes etc., the sand monkeys won't be able to trust each other (And they'll start to get the idea that the US is damn series about terrorism.

17 posted on 01/06/2003 6:12:51 PM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Kofi is a muslim too. He is one of them.

When is Kofi the Clown's stint over? And does anyone have any idea who will be put in charge next?

18 posted on 01/06/2003 6:15:25 PM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said Saddam's statements were "an attempt to divert attention from the fact that Iraq has still not shown signs that it will disarm itself of weapons of mass destruction."

Yep. Where is the paperwork that shows he has destroyed them? We already know he has them, and has used them. So where are they? Iraq? Syria?
Saddam has to prove he's destroyed them, or else we know he still has them, somewhere, and if he still has them, we have the right to stop him.

19 posted on 01/06/2003 6:59:00 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
What would Iraq have to gain out of doing that?
20 posted on 01/06/2003 7:12:15 PM PST by droberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson