Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL: Giants would have been flagged if they spiked it
AP Via ESPN ^ | 1-6-03 | ANON

Posted on 01/06/2003 11:48:10 AM PST by Pharmboy

NEW YORK -- Giants holder Matt Allen could not have spiked the botched snap on the final play of New York's loss to the San Francisco 49ers.

It's against the rules.

Mike Pereira, the NFL supervisor of officials, confirmed Monday that Allen would not have been allowed to immediately spike the ball because it was a long snap. The only time a player can spike the ball is when he takes the snap from under the center.

With six seconds left Sunday and the Giants trailing 39-38, Matt Bryant lined up to try a potential game-winning 41-yard field goal. The snap from newly signed Trey Junkin was in the dirt. Allen fumbled the ball, then made a desperation pass downfield to what turned out to be an ineligible receiver, guard Rich Seubert.

Fox commentator Cris Collinsworth said at the time that since it was third down, Allen could have spiked the ball, giving the Giants another chance at a kick. Afterward, on the Fox postgame show, other commentators agreed.

Pereira said the only other option would have been to throw to an eligible receiver.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: choke; football; giants; playoffs; rules
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321 next last
To: Coop
Costas was the little rich kid down the street with the killer sportscard collection. He just never put it down for 40 years! The tension between Costas, Marino, and Carter is so thick you can't cut it with Shockey and a chainsaw. It all seems to come from Costas's ego.

May an army of angry prostitutes soon give interviews with Fox Sports, involving the wearing of ladies underwear, exploration of confined entry sites with rodents, and a certain Cubscout troop who has an intimate relationship with A certain mentioned commentator.

141 posted on 01/06/2003 12:49:33 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink; hchutch
You want to talk about a great Bears free agent receiver? HOw about Dennis McKinnon. Since he was in Bobby Bowden's doghouse at FSU nobody drafted him.
142 posted on 01/06/2003 12:49:38 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Suppose, however, that the Giants had gotten a legitimate second chance at that last field goal. At that point they were 0 for 2 on getting a clean snap from the center to the holder, and at that point there was absolutely no evidence that they'd get the third one right.

In fact, I'm hoping the officials had blown the call deliberately just as a matter of principle. A football team that can't even get a clean snap down on a field goal attempt doesn't even belong on a high school field, let alone in the NFL playoffs.

143 posted on 01/06/2003 12:49:53 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I beleive there were no off-setting penalties on that play. I thought the flag for pass interference is picked up when the receiver being interfered with is ineligible.

Oh please just let it end.

This is not to Alberta's Child just Giant fans all over.

Don't whine, we come from a proud old guard tradition that laments our losses but never makes excuses or whines or bitches. We lost....period, end of story.

Let's not turn into Raider fans who dispute a correctly called play.

But I do have a question, is it against the rules to have the cheerleaders in the endzone during field goals? I can't remember seeing this before the game yesterday. Not that it mattered but I am curious just because I haven't see that before. My roommate has dropped his opposition to cheerleaders for this factor.

144 posted on 01/06/2003 12:50:06 PM PST by amused
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I agree.
145 posted on 01/06/2003 12:50:13 PM PST by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: hchutch; discostu; amused
What would the penalty have been?
Probably intentional grounding

IMHO, that'd be a pretty crappy rule...
Oughta just call it a bonehead intentional fumble and let play continue with whoever pounces on the ball getting possession.

146 posted on 01/06/2003 12:50:44 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Ah, I've been waiting for a Raider flag pic, thanks. Oh, and all can now bow to the mighty Raider flag! :-)
147 posted on 01/06/2003 12:50:45 PM PST by walkingdead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
and one of the biggest follies of the modern day NFL coach. Conservatism only works in politics, not in football.

Let us remember that it was Jon Gruden who engineered that defeat for the Raiders. As a Raider fan, I was glad to see him take his conservative play to Tampa. Now he will be victimized by the 49ers.

148 posted on 01/06/2003 12:50:59 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: discostu
The moment the holder, Allen, yelled, "FAHR!" (in my best former H.S. coach voice), the game was over unless the holder could have navigated his way by foot to the endzone or, oddly enough, placed a perfectly executed dropkick between the uprights.

The offensive line started down field eliminating any chance of a forward pass which would result in an illegal man down field, offensive penalty, 10 second runoff on the clock, game over.

Any defensive penalty would have been offset by the illegal man down field, play dead, no time left on the clock, game over.

There was six seconds left on the clock at the snap. A muffed snap and a sprint to the sidelines would have taken too long and falling on the ball and calling timeout would have defintely put the kick out of Bryant's range. But then again, they could have had Shockey kick the fieldgoal right Mr. Collinsworth?

149 posted on 01/06/2003 12:52:42 PM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
Not only will we take it, but love it! coming back from a sure loser, the 9'ers did a Montana bounce!! you got'a love the NFL!!!!!
150 posted on 01/06/2003 12:52:42 PM PST by Cabbages and Kings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
I see -- I hadn't heard that.

Not that the Giants deserved another shot at it anyway. If I were the coach and my team had been given another chance on the play, then I would have punted the ball away just to make a point.

151 posted on 01/06/2003 12:52:44 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
I don't liek to call that conservatism, I call it chickensh!t. As herm Edwards and Dan Reeves showed saturday, the conservative way to nurse a lead is to keep calling the stuff that got you a lead in the first place.
152 posted on 01/06/2003 12:53:04 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Suppose, however, that the Giants had gotten a legitimate second chance at that last field goal. At that point they were 0 for 2 on getting a clean snap from the center to the holder, and at that point there was absolutely no evidence that they'd get the third one right.

You're right. There was no guarantee Byrant would have nailed the FG, but it's another wound for us Giants fans to take.

153 posted on 01/06/2003 12:53:23 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You got that right!!! The bottom line is the Giant's defense lost that game not the offense. Where was Mr. Quarterback Sack man Michael Strahan during the game?
154 posted on 01/06/2003 12:53:46 PM PST by Captain Beyond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
Shockey could have used his super powers to taunt the clock, causing it to stop dead in fear. Shockey could have then lined up under center, thrown the ball into the outer atmosphere where in an earlier time warp his blazing speed opened up giving him an opportunity to catch his own pass in the end zone upon it's return to earth. As a matter of fact, next year the entire team and coaching staff of the Giants can stay at home and just let Shockey play. He can just put on a cape and fly to each venue, landing mid-field just in time for the coin toss.

Or he could have gotten in a fight with the game clock, mysteriously adding 10 seconds in the process.
155 posted on 01/06/2003 12:53:50 PM PST by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: discostu
A poster above really hit was his best option was, throw it to the feet of the guy on the outside left of the line, he's an elligible receiver, and as long as there's a snowballs chance in hell a pass could be caught they'll never call it intentional grounding.

It should still be grounding, because the ball has to make it to the line of scrimmage. But that's also supposed to go for QB's outside of the pocket, and it isn't always called.

I say grounding, phooey. Spike the ball! Let it be grounding. At least the clock stops, and Collins gets a shot at the endzone.

But I prefer to credit Shockey for the loss. When he dropped those four points in the end zone, he dropped the game.

But what do I care: they had very little chance of making it to Philly in any case. My Iggles will just have to beat Tampa Bay again.

156 posted on 01/06/2003 12:54:29 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Yea, when your up one or two scores, you can't just sit back in a soft zone, any modern-day quarterback will eat you alive! You absolutely have to keep the pressure on, right up till the final gun. And hey, if you get beat deep, so be it, at least you were fighting till the bitter end.
157 posted on 01/06/2003 12:55:32 PM PST by walkingdead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
If the guard lined up as an eligible receiver than he would have reported to the refs before the snap. The referee than must inform the defensive captain. I doubt that happened and Francesa is a fat whining toad.
158 posted on 01/06/2003 12:55:55 PM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: amused
If the information in Post #140 is correct, then the officials blew the call.

Of course, I've been saying for the last two weeks that this Giants team didn't even belong in the playoffs. So I've got nothing to complain about. They didn't deserve to win that game because they didn't make a single "winning" play all game.

159 posted on 01/06/2003 12:56:09 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
"GO BRONCOS (Although I am a J-E-T-S fan this week!)"

"Your comment, tied with your screen name, looks like an oxymoron."

Your graphic looks like a urinal cake!

(Gotta love the Broncos-Raiders games!)


160 posted on 01/06/2003 12:56:38 PM PST by ThinkingMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson